Advertisement

Evoked Responses for Differentiating Neurogenic Lesions in the Urogenital System in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

  • H. W. M. Anten
  • E. S. C. van Waalwijk van Doorn
  • F. M. J. Debruyne
Conference paper

Abstract

Neuropathy is one of the most common complications in patients with diabetes mellitus. Normally, this neuropathy is classified as somatic or autonomic. Somatic neuropathy is seen very frequently and can affect every part of the peripheral nerve system (Ellenberg 1982) and autonomic neuropathy can cause functional disorders in almost any organ. In particular, the cardiovascular, gastro-intestinal, sudomotoric, vasomotoric, endocrine and urogenital systems are involved. In case of an autonomic neuropathy both afferent and efferent fibres of the sympathetic and/or parasympathetic nerve systems can be affected (Hosking et al. 1978).

Keywords

Autonomic Neuropathy External Anal Sphincter Pudendal Nerve Pelvic Nerve Hypogastric Nerve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aagenaes O (1963) Neurovascular examinations on the lower extremities in young diabetics with special reference to the autonomic neuropathy. Thesis. Reports of the Steno Mermorial Hospital, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen JT, Bradley WE (1976) Abnormalities of bladder innervation in diabetes mellitus. Urol-ogy 7: 442–448Google Scholar
  3. Anten HWM, van Waalwijk van Doom ESC, Debruyne FMJ (1986) Classification of neurogenic lesions in the urogenital system of EMG and evoked responses. In: Proceedings. ICS, Boston, pp 98–100Google Scholar
  4. Badr GG, Fall M, Carlsson CA, Lindström L, Friberg S, Ohlsson B (1984) Cortical Evoked Potentials obtained after stimulation of the lower urinary tract. J Urol 131 (2): 306–309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrington FJF (1914) The nervous mechanism of micturition. Q J Exp Physiol 8: 33Google Scholar
  6. Bradley WE (1972) Urethral electromyelography. J Urol 108: 563–564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley WE (1978) Innervation of the male urinary bladder. Urol Clin North Am 5: 279–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley WE, Timm GW, Rockswold GL, Scott FB (1975) Detrusor and urethral electromyelography. J Urol 114 (6): 891–894PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dolman CL (1963) The morbid anatomy of diabetic neuropathy. Neurology 13: 135–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellenberg M (1982) Diabetic neuropathy. Compr Ther 8 (1): 21–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ertekin C, Akyürekli O, Gürses AN, Turgut H (1985) The value of somatosensory-evoked potentials and bulbocaveraosus reflex in patients with impotence. Acta Neurol Scand 71: 48–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faerman I, Maler M, Jadzinsky M, Alvarez E, Fox D, Zilbervarg J, Cibeira JB, Colinas R (1971) Asymptomatic neurogenic bladder in juvenile diabetics. Diabetologia 7 (3): 168–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fagerberg SE, Kock NG, Petersen I, Stener I (1967) Urinary bladder disturbances in diabetics: A comparative study of male diabetics and controls aged between 20 and 50 years. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1: 19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frimodt-Møller C (1976) Diabetic cystopathy: Relationship to some late-diabetic manifestations. Dan Med Bull 23: 279–287Google Scholar
  15. Haldeman S, Bradley WE, Bhatia N (1982a) Evoked Responses from the pudendal nerve. J Urol 128 (5): 974–980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Haldeman S, Bradley WE, Bhatia NN, Johnson BK (1982b) Pudendal evoked responses. Arch Neurol 39: 280–283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hosking DJ, Bennett T, Hampton JR (1978) Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes 27 (10): 1043–1055PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaplan PE (1981) A somatosensory evoked response obtained after stimulation of the contralateral pudendal nerve: A preliminary report. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 21: 585–587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Riedel H (1965) Systematische morphologische Untersuchungen am Rückenmark von Diabetikern. Zentralbl Allg Pathol 107: 506–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rockswold GL, Bradley WE, Timm GW, Chou SN (1976) Electrophysiological technique forGoogle Scholar
  21. evaluating lesions of the conus medullaris and cauda equina. J Neurosurg 45(3): 321–326Google Scholar
  22. Rundles RW (1945) Diabetic neuropathy: General review with report of 125 cases. Medicine 24: 111–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rushworth G (1967) Diagnostic value of the electromyographic study of reflex activity in man. In: Widen L (ed) Recent advances in clinical neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol [Suppl] 25: 65–73Google Scholar
  24. Slager U (1978) Diabetic myelopathy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 102 (9): 467–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Vodusek DB, Janko M, Lokar J (1983) Direct and reflex responses in perineal muscles on electrical stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46: 67–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. W. M. Anten
    • 1
  • E. S. C. van Waalwijk van Doorn
    • 1
  • F. M. J. Debruyne
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neurology“De Goddelijke Voorzienigheid” HospitalSittardNetherlands

Personalised recommendations