Avoiding Magnetic Monopoles in Numerical MHD Calculations

  • M. Schmidt-Voigt

Abstract

Beside the equations for mass, momentum and energy conservation, a numerical magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) code (assuming infinite conductivity) has to solve the magnetic field equation:
$$\frac{\partial }{{\partial t}}\overrightarrow B = [\overrightarrow \triangleright \times [\overrightarrow v \times \overrightarrow B ]],$$
(1)
which automatically fulfills \((\overrightarrow \triangleright \cdot \overrightarrow B ) =0\) if used as an initial condition. However, due to discretization errors usually artificial magnetic monopoles develop and grow during the computation, what causes an artificial force parallel to the field, energy and momentum no longer being conserved (BRACKBILL and BARNES [1]). Stationarity may not be achieved. In the present study we discuss the effects of the monopoles, and we get rid of them in treating \((\overrightarrow \triangleright \cdot \overrightarrow B ) = 0\) as a dynamical condition: RAMSHAW [2] shows that field equation (1) and solenoidal condition together are equivalent with the two equations (for \((\overrightarrow \triangleright \cdot \overrightarrow B ) = 0\))
$$\frac{\partial }{{\partial t}}\overrightarrow B = [\overrightarrow \triangleright \times [\overrightarrow v \times \overrightarrow B ]] + \overrightarrow \triangleright \Psi (\overrightarrow x ,t),$$
(2)
$${\overrightarrow \triangleright ^2}\Psi = \frac{\partial }{{\partial t}}\left( {\overrightarrow \triangleright \cdot \overrightarrow B } \right).$$
(3)
To implement (2) and (3) to a MHD code, it is more convenient to define the potential (with (△t is the time step)
$$\Phi (\overrightarrow x ) = \int_{t - \triangleleft t}^t {\Psi (\overrightarrow x ,{t^/})d{t^/}} .$$
(4)
After having calculated \(\overrightarrow B (\overrightarrow x ,t)\) from (1), we solve the Poisson equation
$${\overrightarrow \triangleright ^2}\Phi = - (\overrightarrow \triangleright \cdot \overrightarrow B ).$$
(5)
Finally \(\overrightarrow B (\overrightarrow x ,t)\) from (1) has to be replaced by
$${\overrightarrow B ^/}(\overrightarrow x ,t) = \overrightarrow B (\overrightarrow x ,t) + \overrightarrow \triangleright \Phi ,$$
(6)
what is equivalent to solving (2) and (3), and yields the ordinary field equation (1) with \((\overrightarrow \triangleright \cdot \overrightarrow B )=0\) and \( \tilde \Phi \)=const.on the boundary surface.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brackbill, J.U., Barnes, D.C.: 1980, J. Comp. Phys. 35, 426MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ramshaw, J.D.: 1983, J. Comput. Phys. 52, 592Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beam, R.M., Warming, R.F.: 1976, J. Comp. Phys. 22, 87MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beam, R.M., Warming, R.F.: 1978, AIAA J. 16, 393ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Low, B.C.: 1982a, Astrophys. J. 254, 796MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Low, B.C.: 1982b, Astrophys. J. 261, 351MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmidt, H.U., Wegmann, R.: 1980, Comp. Phys. Comm. 19, 309ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Schmidt-Voigt
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für Physik und AstrophysikInstitut für AstrophysikGarchingFed. Rep. of Germany

Personalised recommendations