Advertisement

Die klinische Bedeutung einer neuen Bronchusprovokationsmethode

Conference paper

Zusammenfassung

Die klinische Bedeutung der Bronchusprovokation ergibt sich aus der Summe jener Informationen, die der Arzt aus dem Provokationsergebnis zur Betreuung seiner Patienten ableiten kann. Diese Informationen liefern Indikation und Motivation zur Durchführung der Untersuchung. Jede Bronchusprovokation zur Messung der unspezifischen bronchialen Reaktivität beruht auf demselben Prinzip: Ein möglichst genau standardisierter Reiz bewirkt am Bronchialbaum eine meßbare, obstruktive Reaktion, aus deren Ausmaß auf den Grad der Reaktivität rückgeschlossen werden kann.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. American Thoracic Society (1962) Chronic bronchitis, asthma and pulmonary emphysema: Definitions and classification. Am Rev Respir Dis 85: 762Google Scholar
  2. Cockcroft DW, Killian DN, Mellon JJA, et al (1977) Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: A method and clinical survey. Clin Allergy 7: 235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deal EC, McFadden EF, Ingram RH, et al (1979) Hyperpnea and heat flux: Initial reaction sequence in exercise-induced asthma. J Appl Physiol 46: 476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Deal EC, McFadden EF, Ingram RH, et al (1980) Airway responsiveness to cold air and hyperpnea in normal subjects and in those with hay fever and asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis 121: 621PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Galdes-Sebalt M, McLaughlin FJ, Levison H (1985) Comparison of cold air, ultrasonic mist, and methacholine inhalations as tests of bronchial reactivity in normal and asthmatic children. J Pediatr 107: 526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kerrebijn KF, Neijens HJ (1981) Measurement of the bronchial responsiveness in children. Progr Respir Res 17: 143Google Scholar
  7. McLaughlin FJ, Dozor A (1983) Cold air inhalation challenge in the diagnosis of asthma in children. Pediatrics 72: 503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McNicol KN, Williams HB (1973) Spectrum of asthma in children — I, clinical and physiological components. Br Med J 4: 7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Neijens HJ, Duiverman EJ, Kerrebijn KF (1983) Bronchial responsiveness in children. Ped Clin North Am 30: 829Google Scholar
  10. Orehek J, Gayrard P, Smith AP, et al (1977) Airway response to carbachol in normal and asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 115: 937PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pearlman DS (1984) Bronchial asthma. A perspective from childhood to adulthood. AJDC 138: 459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. SEPCR Working Group „Bronchial Hyperreactivity“ (1983) Guidelines for standardization of bronchial challenges with (nonspecific) bronchoconstricting agents. Bull Europ Physiopath Resp 19:495Google Scholar
  13. Tal A, Pasterkamp H, Serrette C, et al (1984) Response to cold air hyperventilation in normal and in asthmatic children. J Pediatr 104: 516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Woolcock AJ, Salome CM, Yan K (1984) The shape of the dose-response curve to histamine in asthmatic and normal subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 130: 71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zach M, Polgar G, Kump H, Kroisel P (1984) Cold air challenge of airway hyper-reactivity in children: Practical application and theoretical aspects. Pediatr Res 18: 469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zach M (1985) Die Kaltlufthyperventilationsprovokation des hyperreaktiven kindlichen Respirationstraktes — Prüfung der antiasthmatischen Schutzwirkung eines Kombinationspräparates (Dinatriumcromoglykat plus Reproterol). Prax Klin Pneumol 39: 269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zach M, Kump H, Polgar G (1985) Dose-response curves to cold air challenge (CACh) in children with asthmatic airway hyperreactivity. Am Rev Respir Dis 131 (part 2): A234Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Zach
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitäts-Kinderklinik GrazGrazDeutschland

Personalised recommendations