Predictive Tests for Occupational Allergies

  • W. E. Parish
Conference paper
Part of the Archives of Toxicology, Supplement book series (TOXICOLOGY, volume 11)


The workplace may present special allergic hazards not normally occurring in the general environment. Staff may be exposed for long periods to chemicals not encountered by the general public - or not in the same amounts - or there may be prolonged exposure to normal substances by an abnormal route, as, for instance, the inhalation of dusts of cereals, yeasts and additives by bakers, sometimes resulting in asthma.


Contact Dermatitis Allergic Contact Dermatitis Predictive Test Bordetella Pertussis Inhalation Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bernstein IL (1982) Isocyanate-induced pulmonary diseases: a current perspective. J Allergy Clin Immunol 70:24–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berrens L (1971) The chemistry of atopic allergens. Basel, KargerGoogle Scholar
  3. Davies RJ (1984) Respiratory hypersensitivity to diisocyanates. In: Pepys J (ed) Occupational respiratory allergy. Saunders, London, pp 103–123Google Scholar
  4. ECETOC (1980) Skin sensitization. European Chemical Industry Ecology and Toxicology Centre. Brussels (task force report)Google Scholar
  5. ECETOC (1980) Skin sensitization. European Chemical Industry Ecology and Toxicology Centre. Brussels (task force report)Google Scholar
  6. Goodwin BFJ, Roberts DW, Williams DL, Johnson AW (1983) Skin sensitization potential of saturated and unsaturated sultones. In: Gibson GG, Hubbard R, Parke DV (eds) Immunotoxicology, Academic, London, pp 443–448Google Scholar
  7. Health and Safety Commission (1982) Methods for the determination of toxicity. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London (Health and Safety Commission Approved Code of Practice)Google Scholar
  8. Magnusson B, Kligman AM (1970) Allergic contact dermatitis in the guinea-pig. Identification of contact allergens. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  9. Marzulli FN, Maibach HJ (eds) (1977) Dermatotoxicology and pharmacology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Parish WE (1981) Immunological tests to predict toxicological hazards to man. In: Gorrod JW (ed) Testing for toxicity. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 297–315Google Scholar
  11. Parish WE (1986) Evaluation of in vitro predictive tests for irritation and allergic sensitization. Fd Chem Toxic 24:481–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pepys J (1984) Occupational allergy due to platinum complex salts. In: Pepys J (ed) Occupational respiratory allergy. Saunders, London, pp 131–157Google Scholar
  13. Ritz HL, Buehler EV (1980) Planning, conduct and interpretation of guinea-pig sensitization patch tests. In: Drill VA, Lazar P (eds) Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity, 2nd edn. Academic, New York, pp 25–40Google Scholar
  14. Roberts DW, Williams DL (1982) The derivation of quantitative correlations between skin sensitisation and physio-chemical parameters for alkylating agents, and their application to experimental data for sultones. J Theor Biol 99:807–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roberts DW, Goodwin BFJ, Williams DL, Jones K, Johnson AW, Alderson JCE (1983) Correlations between skin sensitization potential and chemical reactivity for p-nitrobenzyl compounds. Fd Chem Toxic 21:811–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. E. Parish
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Safety LaboratoryUnilever Research and EngineeringSharnbrookUK

Personalised recommendations