Teratogenicity Testing in Vitro: Status of Validation Studies

  • N. A. Brown
Part of the Archives of Toxicology, Supplement book series (TOXICOLOGY, volume 11)


Alternatives to the standard method of using pregnant mammals to test for teratogenicity have been the subject of extensive review and comment in recent years (see, for example, Shepard et al. 1983; Johnson 1984; Sadler and Warner 1984; Brown and Freeman 1984; Neubert et al. 1985). There has been much debate on the uses and limitations of alternative tests, although no consensus has yet emerged. Regardless of these considerations, several test systems are commercially available and being used for the initial estimation of teratogenicity (variously termed “screening” or “prescreening”). The purpose of this study was to examine the current status of validation studies of the various model systems which have been proposed as potential tests. There are many other aspects of this field which will not be considered here: for example, the practicality of tests and the scientific basis of test design. The above reviews can be consulted for further discussion of these topics. It is appropriate, however, to make clear the limitations of any in vitro test for teratogenicity. (Strictly speaking, several of the models proposed as tests are not “in vitro” systems, but the terms “alternative test” and “in vitro test” are used synonymously in this paper.)


Alternative Test Developmental Toxicity Validation Performance Compound Selection Mammalian Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bournais-Vardiabasis N, Teplitz RL, Chernoff GF, Seecof RL (1982) Detection of teratogens in the drosophila embryonic cell culture test: assay of 100 chemicals. Teratology 28:109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun AG, Emerson DJ, Nichinson BB (1979) Teratogenic drugs inhibit tumour cell attachment of lectin-coated surfaces. Nature 282:507–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braun AG, Buckner CA, Emerson DA, Nichinson BB (1982) Quantitative correspondence between the in vivo and in vitro activity of teratogenic agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:2056–2060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown NA, Freeman SJ (1984) Alternative tests for teratogenicity. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 12:7–23Google Scholar
  5. Dumont JN, Epler RG (1984) Validation studies on the FETAX teratogenesis assay (frog embryos). Teratology 29:38AGoogle Scholar
  6. Fabro S, Shull G, Brown NA (1982) The relative teratogenic index and teratogenic potency: proposed components of developmental toxicity risk assessment. Teratogen Carcinogen Mutagen 2:61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flint OP, Orton TC (1984) An in vitro assay for teratogens with cultures of rat embryo midbrain and limb bud cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 76:383–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flint OP, Orton TC, Ferguson RA (1984) Differentiation of rat embryo cells in culture: response following acute maternal exposure to teratogens and non-teratogens. J Appl Toxicol 4:109–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenburg JH (1982) Detection of teratogens by differentiating embryonic neural crest cells in culture: evaluation as a screening system. Teratogen Carcinogen Mutagen 2:319–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guntakatta M, Mathews EJ, Rundell JO (1984) Development of a mouse embryo limb bud cell culture system for the estimation of chemical teratogenic potential. Teratogen Carcinogen Mutagen 4:349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hassell JR, Horigan EA (1982) Chondrogenesis: a model developmental system for measuring teratogenic potential of compounds. Teratogen Carcinogen Mutagen 2:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jelinek R (1977) The chick embryotoxicity screening test. In: Neubert D, Merker HJ, Kwasigroch TE (eds) Methods in prenatal toxicology: evaluation of embryotoxic effects in experimental animals. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 381–386Google Scholar
  13. Johnson EM (1980) A subvertebrate System for rapid determination of potential teratogenic hazards. J Environ Pathol Toxicol 4:153–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson EM (1981) Screening for teratogenic hazards: nature of the problems. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 21:417–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson EM (1984) A prioritization and biologic decision tree for developmental toxicity safety evaluations. J Am Coll Toxicol 3:141–155Google Scholar
  16. Johnson EM, Gabel BEG (1983) An artificial ‘embryo’ for detection of abnormal developmental biology. Fund Appl Toxicol 3:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keller SJ, Smith MK (1982) Animal virus screens for potential teratogens. I. Poxvirus morphogenesis. Teratogen Carcinogen Mutagen 2:361–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mummery CL, van den Brink CE, van der Saag PT, de Laat SW (1984) A short-term screening test for teratogens using differentiating neuroblastoma cells in vitro. Teratology 29:271–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neubert D, Blankenburg G, Lewandowski C, Klug S (1985) Misinterpretations of results and creation of “artifacts” in studies on developmental toxicity using systems simpler than in vivo systems. In: Lash JW, Saxen L (eds) Developmental mechanisms normal and abnormal Liss, New York, pp 241–266 (Progress in clinical and biological research, vol 171)Google Scholar
  20. Pratt RM, Willis WD (1985) In vitro screening assay for teratogens using growth inhibition of human embryonic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:5791–5794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sadler TW, Warner CW (1984) Use of whole embryo culture for evaluating toxicity and teratogenicity. Pharmacol Rev 36:1456S–150SGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmid BP, Trippmacher A, Bianchi A (1983) Validation of the whole-embryo culture method for in vitro teratogenicity testing. In: Hayes AW, Schnell RC, Miya TS (eds) Developments in the science and practice of toxicology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 563–566Google Scholar
  23. Shepard TH, Fantel AG, Mirkes PE, Greenaway JC, Faustman-Watts E, Campbell M, Juchau MR (1983) Teratology testing: I. Development and status of short-term prescreens. II. Biotransformation of teratogens as studied in whole embryo culture. In: Macleod SM, Okey AB, Spielberg SP (eds) Developmental pharmacology. Liss, New York, pp 147–164 (Progress in clinical and biological research, vol 135)Google Scholar
  24. Smith MK, Kimmel GL, Kochhar DM, Shepard TH, Spielberg SP, Wilson JG (1983) A selection of candidate compounds for in vitro teratogenesis test validation. Teratogen Carcinogen Mutagen 3:461–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilk AL, Greenberg JH, Horigan EA, Pratt RM, Martin GR (1980) Detection of teratogenic compounds using differentiating embryonic cells in culture. In Vitro 16:269–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. A. Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.MRC Experimental Embryology and Teratology UnitMedical Research Council LaboratoriesCarshaltonUK

Personalised recommendations