Influence of cervical spinal cord stimulation on the vascular system

  • Philippe Gersbach
  • M. Hasdemir
  • D. Mettler
Conference paper


Various studies have shown that dorsal column stimulation (DCS) represents a useful alternative treatment in selected cases of unreconstructable peripheral (1, 13, 14, 22, 26) and coronary (5, 9, 19, 21, 23) artery disease. Despite good short- and long-term success rates (8, 11, 27), this method still faces some skepticism and criticism, particularly in surgical circles (18). This attitude is mainly due to three major drawbacks of DCS: 1) its supposed vascular effects can only be measured by microcirculatory tests which are often sophisticated and thus not easily reproducible; 2) the typical microcirculatory changes attributed to DCS (12, 13, 14, 15, 24) are characteristically confined to restricted body areas, and are therefore often considered as insufficient to achieve limb salvage in clinical practice; and 3) the DCS mode of action has as yet not been precisely established (1, 4, 15, 22, 23, 26). It is thus of crucial importance to demonstrate by the usual hemodynamic tests that the clinical successes obtained with DCS treatment cannot be attributed to any placebo effect, but to vasoactive mechanisms effectively elicited by DCS.


Spinal Cord Stimulation Microvascular Blood Flow Intractable Angina Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Dorsal Column Stimulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Augustinsson LE, Carlsson CA, Holm J, Jivegård M (1985) Epidural electrical stimulation in severe limb ischemia. Pain relief, increased blood flow and a possible limb-saving effect. Ann Surg 202: 104–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barolat G, Ketcik B, He J (1994) Experience with 250 epidural electrodes implanted in the cervical spine. Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of the International Neuromodulation Society, Göteborg, June 1–4Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chalmers JP, Kapoor V, Llewellyn-Smith IJ, Minson JB, Pilowsky PM (1992) Central control of blood pressure. Eur Heart J; Suppl A 13: 2–9Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chandler MJ, Brennan TJ, Garrison DW, Kim KS, Schwartz PJ, Foreman RD (1993) A mechanism of cardiac pain suppression by spinal cord stimulation: implications for patients with angina pectoris. Eur Heart J 14: 96–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeJongste MJL, Haaksma J, Hautvast RWM, Hillege HL, Meyler PJW, Staal MJ, Sanderson JE, Lie KI (1994) Effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischemia during normal activity in patients with severe coronary artery disease. A prospective ambulatory ECG study. Br Heart J 71: 413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foreman RD, Chandler MJ, Brennan TJ, Kim KS, Garrison DW, Schwartz PJ (1989) Does dorsal column stimulation reduce the activity of spinothalamic tract cells that respond to cardiac input? Circulation; Suppl II 80: 552Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foreman RD (1994) Neurophysiological mechanisms of pain relief by spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris. Spinal cord stimulation: An innovative method in the treatment of PVD. 2nd international meeting. Köln, Oct. 28–29Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galley D, Rettori R, Baccalon H, Medvedowsky A, Lefebre JM, Sellier F, Chauvreau C, Serise JM, Pieronne A (1992) Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of peripheral vascular disease of the lower limbs. A multicenter study in 244 patients. J Mal Vasc 17: 208–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    González-Darder JM, Canely C, González-Martinez V (1991) High cervical spinal cord stimulation for unstable angina pectoris. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 56: 20–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hautvast RWM, DeJongste MJL, VandenBrink A, Homminga SA, Ruiters M, Lie KI, Korf J, TerHorst GJ (1994) Spinal cord stimulation and the induction of immediate early gene c-Fos and stress protein HS 72 in the central nervous system of rats. Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of the International Neuromodulation Society Göteborg, June 1–4Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horsch S, Claeys L (1994) Epidural spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of severe peripheral arterial disease. Ann Vasc Surg 8: 468–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jacobs MJHM, Jörning PJG, Joshi SR, Kistlaar PJEHM, Slaaf DW, Reneman RS (1988) Epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation improves microvascular blood flow in severe limb ischemia. Ann Surg 207: 179–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jacobs MJHM, Jörning PJG, Beckers RCY, Ubbink DT, van Kleef M, Slaaf DW, Reneman RS (1990) Foot salvage and improvement of microvascular blood flow as a result of epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation. J Vasc Surg 12: 354–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jünger M, Fenchel G, Schulze M, Rahmel B, Seboldt H, Hoffmann F, Patheiger U (1990) Skin microcirculation during epidural spinal electrical stimulation (ESES) in patients with severe peripheral arterial oclcusive disease. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 9: 223Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Linderoth B, Fedorcsak I, Meyerson BA (1991) Peripheral vasodilation after spinal cord stimulation: Animal studies of putative effector mechanisms. Neurosurgery 28: 187–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Linderoth B, Gunasekera L, Meyerson BA (1991) Effects of sympathectomy on skin and muscle microcirculation during dorsal column stimulation: Animal studies. Neurosurg 29: 874–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Linderoth B, Herregodts P, Meyerson BA (1994) Sympathetic mediation of peripheral vasodilation induced by spinal cord stimulation: Animal studies of the role of cholinergic and adrenergic receptor subtypes. Neurosurgery 35: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    LoGerfo FW (1991) Epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation: An unproven methodology for management of lower extremity ischemia. Editorial. J Vasc Surg 13: 518–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mannheimer C, Eliasson T, Andersson B, Bergh CH, Augustinsson LA, Emanuelsson H, Waagstein F (1993) Effects of spinal cord stimulation in angina pectoris induced by pacing and possible mechanisms of action. Br Med J 307: 477–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meglio M, Cioni B, Rossi GF, Sandric S, Santarelli P (1986) Spinal cord stimulation affects the central mechanism of regulation of heart rate. Appl Neurophysiol 49: 139–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Murphy DF, Giles KE (1987) Dorsal cord stimulation for pain relief from intractable angina pectoris. Pain 28: 365–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nachbur B, Gersbach Ph, Hasdemir M (1994) Spinal cord stimulation for unreconstructible chronic limb ischemia. Eur J Vasc Surg 8: 383–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sanderson JE, Ibrahim B, Waterhouse D, Palmer RGB (1994) Spinal electrical stimulation for intractable angina pectoris-long-term clinical outcome and safety. Eur Heart J 15: 810–814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sciacca V, Mingoli A, di Marzo L, Maggiore C, Fiume D, Cavallero A (1989) Predictive value of transcutaneous oxygen tension measurement in the indication for spinal cord stimulation in patients with peripheral vascular disease: Preliminary results. Vasc Surg 23: 128–132Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sciacca V, Mattioli GL, Oppido PA, Di Giugno G (1994) Epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation (ESES) effect on penile flow: An experimental study. Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of the International Neuromodulation Society Göteborg, June 1–4 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tallis RC, Jacobs M, Miles J (1992) Spinal cord stimulation in peripheral vascular disease. Editorial, Brit J Neurosurg 6:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zucco F, Allaria B, Vaghi M, Rizzi F, Reina W, Boselli E, Brusa S, Tacconi A (1994) Spinal cord stimulation in peripheral vascular disease treatment: Nine-year experience with 241 patients. In: Horsch S, Claeys L (eds) Spinal Cord Stimulation. An Innovative Method in the Treatment of PVD. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, Springer International, pp 183–189Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Gersbach
    • 1
  • M. Hasdemir
    • 2
  • D. Mettler
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryUniversity of BernInselspital, BernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Neurosurgery of the University of BernInselspital, BernSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Experimental Surgery of the University of BernInselspital, BernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations