Mapping of sensory electrical responses to epidural spinal cord stimulation

  • Giancarlo Barolat
Conference paper

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord for therapeutic purpose has been performed since the early 1970s with variable success. More recently the application of spinal cord stimulation to treat ischemic peripheral vascular disease has been popularized in Europe. Exact electrode positioning in the spinal canal is a key factor in providing successful stimulation (4). Unfortunately, there are no published guidelines to intraspinal electrode(s) placement backed by a substantial number of observations in a large number of patients. This contrasts with the detailed observations obtained systematically, for instance, during stereotactic procedures in the deep brain structures. Our efforts have been directed in developing a database of responses to electrical stimulation of the neural intraspinal structures at various spine levels (2, 3, 5–8). All the testing and data collection was performed by professionals working full time in our neuroimplant program and with standardized electrical parameters. This minimized deviations from the protocol and assured a high degree of uniformity and reliability in the data.

Keywords

Europe Assure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barolat G, Zeme S, Ketcik B (1991) Multifactorial Analysis of Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurg 56: 77–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barolat G et al. (1993) Mapping of sensory responses to epidural stimulation of the intraspinal neural structures in man. J Neurosurg 78: 233–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    He J, Barolat G, Strujk J, Holsheimer J (1994) Perception threshold and electrode position for spinal cord stimulation. Pain, In pressGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Law JD, Miller LV (1982) Importance of documentation of an epidural stimulating position. Appl Neurophisiol 45: 461–464Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strujk J,Holsheimer J, Barolat G, He J (1993) Paresthesia threshold in spinal cord stimulation: a comparison of theoretical results with clinical data. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 1: 101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tulgar M, Barolat G, Ketcik B (1994) Analysis of parameters for epidural spinal cord stimulation.Google Scholar
  7. 1.
    Perception and tolerance thresholds resulting from 1,100 combinations. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurg 61: 129–139Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Tulgar M, Barolat G, Ketcik B (1994) Analysis of parameters for epidural spinal cord stimulation.Google Scholar
  9. 2.
    Usange ranges resulting from 3,000 combinations Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurg 61: 140–145Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    Tulgar M, He J, Barolat G, Ketcik B, Strujk H, Holsheimer J (1994) Analysis of parameters for epidural spinal cord stimulation. 3. Topographical distribution of paresthesiae Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurg 61: 146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giancarlo Barolat
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Functional NeurosurgeryThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations