Surgical strategy after failed peripheral bypass surgery

  • Klaus Balzer
Conference paper


The results after peripheral reconstructions have greatly improved in recent years. The patency rate of bifurcated grafts 5 years after implantation is now more than 80%.


Patency Rate Limb Salvage Critical Limb Ischemia Graft Patency Anterior Tibial Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adamek L, Balzer K (1988) Stellenwert und Ergebnisse peripherer gefäßchirurgisch-rekonstruktiver Maßnahmen in der Behandlung der AVK beim Diabetiker, Angio 10, 5: 227–231Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ascer E, Veuth FJ, Morris L, Lesser ML, Gupta SK, Samson RH, Scher VA, White Flores SA (1984) Components of outlow resistance and their correlation with graft patency of lower extremity arterial reconstructions. J Vase Surg 1: 817–828Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beard JD, Scott DJ, Evans JM, Skidmore R, Horrocks M (1988) Pulse generated run-off, a new method of determining calf vessel patency. Br J Surg 74 (4): 361–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bell PRF, Charlesworth D, De Palma R, Jamieson C (1982) The definition of critical ischaemia of a limb, Br J Surg 69: 52, 1Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Charles D (1987) Problems related to run in and run off with reference to the profundafemoris artery and secondary femoropopliteal bypass. Acta Chir Scand 538–543Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cross FW, Cotton LT (1985) Chemical lumbar sympathectomy for ischaemic rest pain. Am J Surg 150: 341–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daling RC, Linton RR (1972) Durability of femoropopliteal reconstructions, AM J Surg, 123: 472–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dardik H, Kahn M, Dardik I, Sussmann B, Ibrahim IM (1982) Influence of failed vascular bypass procedures on conversion of below knee to above knee amputation levels. Surgery 91: 64–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Weese JA, Rob CG (1978) Effect of arterial reconstruction on limb salvage: A ten year appraisal. Arch Surg, 113: 1297–1304Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dormandy JA, Mahir MS (1986) The natural history of peripheral atheromatous disease of the legs. In: Greenhalgh, Jamieson, Nicolaides (ed) Vascular surgery: issues in current practice, Grune and Stratton, London, pp 3–19Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dormandy A, Stock G (1990) Critical leg ischaemia, Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York 1990Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dormandy JA, Thomas PRS (1988) What is the natural history of critically ischaemic patient with and without his leg? In: Greenhalgh RM, Jamieson CW, Nicolaides AN (ed) Limb salvage and amputation for vascular disease. Publ Saunders, pp 11–26Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Erasmi H, Walter M, Schmidt R, Prokop A (1993) Pheripherer Gefäßverschluß — Bypass oder Amputation? Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongreßbericht, 591–593Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Evans LE, Webster MW, Brooks DH, Bahnson HT (1980) Pheripheral-arterial surgery. N Engl J Med, 302: 491–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gardener GA Jr, Harrington DP, Kolrun W, Whittemore A, Mannick JA, Levin DC (1987) Salvage of occluded arterial bypass grafts by means of thrombolysis, J Vase Surg 9: 426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gupta SK, Veith FJ (1980) Below-knee bypass for limb salvage: Comparison of autogenous saphenous vein, polytetrafluorethylene and composite Dacron autogenous vein grafts. Arch Surg, 115: 833–837Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gupta SK, Veith FJ, Ascer E (1988) White Flores SA, Gleedmann ML (1988) Cost factors in limb-threatening ischaemia due to infrainguinal artherosclerosis. European J Vase Surg 2: 151–155Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harris PL, Read F, Eardley A, Charlesworth D, Wakefield J, Sellwood RA (1974) The fate of elderly amputees, Br J Surg 61: 665–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harris PL, Campall H (1986) Femoro-distal bypass for critical ischaemia: is the use of prosthetic grafts justified? Ann Vase Surg 1: 66–72Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harris P, Moody P (1990) Amputations. In: Dormandy A, Stock G: Critical leg ischaemia, Springer Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hertzer NR (1980) Three years experience with expanded polytetrafluorethylene arterial grafts for limb salvage. Amer J Surg, 104: 214Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hobson RW, O’Donnell JA, Jamil Z, Mehta K (1981) Why do reported graft patency rates vary so wide? In: Greenhalgh RM (ed): Femoro-distal bypass. Pittmann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holstein P (1985) Skin perfusion pressure measured by radioisotope washout for predicting wound healing in lower limb amputation for arterial occlusive disease. Thesis Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 213Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Johnson WC (1977) Autogenous venus grafts ten years later. Surgery 82: 775–784Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parvin SD, Evans DH, Bell PRF (1985) Peripheral resistance measurement in the assessment of severe peripheral vascular disease, Br J Surg 72: 751–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ratcliff DA, Clyne CAC, Chant ADB, Webster JHH: Prediction of amputation wound healing: the role of transcutaneous oxygen tension in the selection of amputation level. Am J Surg 147: 510–517Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seibel RMM, Carstensen G, Blazer K, Grönemeyer DHW, Sehnert C (1989) CT-gesteuerte lumbale Sympathikusausschaltung bei der Behandlung der peripheren arteriellen Verschlußkrankheit (AVK). In: Gröbemeyer DHW, Seibel RMM: Interventionelle Computertomographie, Ue- berreuter Wissenschaft, Wien BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Simms MH (1988) Is pedal arch patency a pre-requisite for successful reconstruction? In: Greenhalgh RM, Jamieson CW; Nicolaides AN (ed) Limb salvage and amputation for vascular disease. Publ Saunders, London, pp 49–62Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spence VA, Walker WF, Troup IM, Murdoch G (1981) Amputation of the ischaemic limb: selection of the optimum site by thermography. Angiology 32: 155–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Szilagyi DE, Hagemann JA, Smith RF, Elliott JP (1985) Femoropoplitealer Bypass: Autologe Vene oder PTFE-Prothese? Angio 7, 1: 13–20Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stockei M, Oresen J, Bröchner-Mortensen J, Emnius H (1982) Standardised photoelectric technique as routine method for selection of amputation level. Acta Orthop Scand 53: 875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stockmann U (1983) Pidda — ein Novum in der cruralen Gefäßchirurgie, Angio 5, 2: 67–71Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tuchmann A, Strasser K, Axenkopf G (1972) Obliterationsgrad proximaler Unterschenkelarterien in Beziehung zum Ergebnis femoro-poplitealer Thrombendarteriektomien, Vasa, 1: 256Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Veith FJ, Moss CM, Fell SC, Rhodes BA, Haimovici H (1981) Femoropopliteal bypass to the isolated popliteal segment: is PTFE graft acceptable? Surgery, 89: 296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wilson SE, Wolf GL, Cross A (1989) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus operation for peripheral arteriosclerosis. Report of a randomised trial in a selected group of patients. J Vase Surg 9: 1–9Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wolfe JHN (1988) Critical ischaemie — is this concept of value? In: Greenhalgh RW, Jamieson CW, Nicolaides AN (ed) Limb salvage and amputation for vascular disease, WB Saunders, London, pp 3–10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Balzer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Vascular Surgical Department of the Evangelical HospitalMülheim an der RuhrGermany
  2. 2.Evangelisches KrankenhausMülheim an der RuhrGermany

Personalised recommendations