Skip to main content

Bypasses to isolated popliteal artery

  • Conference paper
Critical Limb Ischemia

Abstract

Tibial reconstructions show a relatively high occlusion rate, both with autologous saphenous vein, prosthetic grafts or biological materials. The patency with autologous saphenous vein was after 1 year 78%; 64% proved to be patent after 2 years; 60% were patent after 3 years, and 47% after 5 years (6–7). Tibial reconstructions with PTFE had patency rates of nearly 68% after 1 year, 37% after 3 years, and 28% after 5 years (6). The group of composite grafts (PTFE/saphenous vein) in tibial position had patency rates of 57, 37, and 34% at 1, 3, and 5 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Darling RC (1975) In discussion of bypass vein grafts in patients with distal popliteal artery occlusion. Am J Surg 129: 421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta SK, Veith FJ (1982) Fate of patients with a blind popliteal artery segment: limb loss with a patent femoropopliteal graft. In: Veith FJ (ed) Critical Problems in Vascular Surgery. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts: 241–250

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kram HB, Gupta SK, Veith FJ, Wengerter KR et al. (1991) Late results of two-hundred-seventeen femoropopliteal bypasses to isolated popliteal artery segments. J Vase Surg 14: 386–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mannick JA, Jackson BT, Coffman JD et al. (1967) Success of bypass vein grafts in patients with isolated popliteal artery segments. Surgery 61: 17–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morre WS (1990) The Preferential Use of PTFE for Initial Femoropopliteal Bypass. In: Veith FJ (ed) Current Critical Problems in Vascular Surgery, Vol 2, St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing:59–61

    Google Scholar 

  6. Raithel D (1991) Role of PTFE Grafts in Infrainguinal Arterial Reconstructions: A 10-Year Experience. In: Veith FJ (ed) Current Critical Problems in Vascular Surgery, Vol 3. St. Louis: Qual Medical Publishing:66–70

    Google Scholar 

  7. Raithel D (1992) Das isolierte Popliteasegment — eine Alternative zum kruralen Bypass. In: Hepp W, Palenker JH: Femorokrurale Arterienverschlüsse. Darmstadt, Steinkopff Verlag: 175–179

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt

About this paper

Cite this paper

Raithel, D. (1995). Bypasses to isolated popliteal artery. In: Horsch, S., Claeys, L. (eds) Critical Limb Ischemia. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72515-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72515-9_17

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-0968-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72515-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics