Advertisement

Anschluß an das PI-Segment: Technik und erste Ergebnisse

  • A. Gaitzsch
  • E. Zanea-Wangler
Conference paper
Part of the Berliner Gefäßchirurgische Reihe book series (BERLINGEFÄß, volume 5)

Summary

Results of femoro-distal bypass grafting in the absence of a saphenous vein are not encouraging. Neither has the development of new prosthetic materials nor that of biografts led to a substantial improvement of patency rates. Aiming better short- and long-term patency rates a conical PTFE prosthesis has been prospectively used for distal grafting by adding the theoretical advantages of a modified Miller-cuff technique (“venous boot”) for the distal anastomosis. Preliminary results of the first 26 cases are presented.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Beard JD, Benveniste GL, Miller JH, Baird RN, Horroeks M (1986) Haemodynamics of the interposition vein cuff. Br J Surg 73: 823–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergan JJ, Veith FJ, Bernhard VM, Yao IS, Flinn WR, Gupta SK, Scher LA, Samson RH,Towne JB (1982) Randomization of autoenous vein and polytetrafluorethylene grafts in femoral-distal reconstruction. Surgery 92: 921–930PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Binns RL, Ku DN, Stewart MT, Ansley JP, Coyle KA (1989) Optimal graft diameter: Effect of wall shear stress on vascular healing. J Vas Surg 10: 326: 337Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Budd JS, Brennan J, Beard JD, Warren H, Burton PR, Bell PRF (1990) Infrainguinal bypass surgery: factor determining late graft patency. Br J Surg 77: 1382–1387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Budd JS, Langdon J, Brennau J, Bell PRF (1991) Above-knee prosthetic grafts do not compromise. The ipsilateral long saphenous vein. Br J Surg 78: 1379–1380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Charlesworth PM, Brewster DG, Darling RG, Robison JG, Hallet IW (1985) The fate of polytetrafluorethylene grafts in lower limb bypass surgery: A six year follow up. Br J Surg 72: 896–899Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hagmuller E, Ockert D, Storz LW (1992) Früh- und Langzeitergebnisse nach 228 infragenualen femoropoplitealen Bypassimplantationen mit dünnwandigem und ringverstärktem expanded Polytetrafluoräthylen. Z Herz-, Thorax-, Gefäßchir 6: 81–89Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Londrey GL, Ramsey DE, Hodgson KJ, Barkmeier LD, Sumner DS (1991) Infrapopliteal bypass for severe ischemia: comparison of autogenous vein, composite and prothetic grafts. J Vase surg 13: 631–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor RS, Loh A, McFarland RJ, Cox M, Chester JF (1992) Improved technique for polytetrafluorethylene bypass grafting: long-term results using anastomotic vein patches. Br J Surg 79: 348–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tilanus HW, Obertop H, Van Urk H (1985) Saphenous vein of PTFE for femoropopliteal bypass. Ann Surg 6: 780–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tyrell MR, Rampling MW, Wolfe JHN, Chester JF, Taylor RS (1992) PTFE, collars and patches. J Invest Surg 5: 25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tyrell MR, Wolfe JHN (1992) New prothetic venous collar anastomotic technique: combining the best of other procedures. Br J Surg 78: 1016–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag, GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Gaitzsch
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. Zanea-Wangler
    • 1
  1. 1.II. Chir. Lehrstuhl zu Köln, GefäßchirurgieKlinikum MerheimGermany
  2. 2.II. Chirurgische UniversitätsklinikKöln-MerheimKölnGermany

Personalised recommendations