Cardiac Pacing pp 187-192 | Cite as

Left Ventricular Pump Function after Long-Term Treatment with Ventricular Pacing compared to Atrial Synchronous Pacing

  • S. K. Pehrsson
  • H. Åström
Conference paper

Summary

The effect of VVI and VAT pacing on the left ventricular pump function was determined by cardiac catheterization after long-term treatment in 9 patients with high degree heart block. Measurements were made in supine at rest, with the patients legs elevated, during steady state work and the procedure was ended with a period of stepwise increase in load of 10 W × 1 min-1 until exhaustion (Wmax). Function curves were constructed by plotting stroke work index (SWI) and left ventricular power index (LVPI) against left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP).

Cardiac output (CO) increased with VAT vs VVI pacing at rest by 22% (5.5 vs 4.5 l/min, p < 0.01). An increased stroke volume constituted the difference (75 vs 63 ml, p < 0.05). The ventricular rate being the same. At Wmax CO increased with VAT vs VVI by 40% (10.2 vs 7.3 l/min, p < 0.01). Atrial rate (AR), systolic aortic pressure (SP) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was reduced during exercise with VAT vs VVI pacing. The function curves with SWI vs LVEDP demonstrated a shift to the right with a significant decrease in SWI during exercise with VAT vs VVI, whereas LVPI vs LVEDP showed a shift to the left with a significant increase in LVPI at Wmax with VAT vs VVI. The changes in function curves, as the reduction in AR, SP and SVR appear to be constituted by a decrease in sympathetic activity with the VAT vs VVI.

The present study demonstrates that hemodynamic advantages with VAT pacing are still obtainable after several years of prior VVI pacing.

Keywords

Catheter Depression Cula 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jonsell S: A method for the determination of the heart size by teleroentgenography (A Heart Volume Index). Acta Radiol 1939; 20: 325–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Center S, Nathan DA, Wu C-Y, Samet P, Keller W: The implantable synchronous pacer in the treatment of complete heart block. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1963; 46: 744–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karlöf I: Haemodynamic effect of atrial triggered versus fixed rate pacing at rest and during exercise in complete heart block. Acta Med Scand 1975; 197: 195–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ogawa S, Dreifus LS, Shenoy PN, Brockman SK, Berkovits VB: Hemodynamic consequences of atrioventricular and ventriculoatrial pacing. Pace 1978; 1: 8–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kappenberger L, Gloor HO, Babotai J, Stenbrunn W, Turina M: Hemodynamic effects of atrial synchronization in acute and long-term ventricular pacing. Pace 1982; 5: 639–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kruse I, Amman K, Conradson T -B, Rydén L: A comparison of the acute and long-term hemodynamic effects of ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing. Circulation 1982; 65: 846–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sowton E, Thorburn C, Roy P: Haemodynamic changes during cardiac pacing. Proceedings of the IVth International Symposium on Cardiac Pacing. Van Gorcum Assen, 1973.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sarnoff SJ, Berglund E: Ventricular function. Starling’s law of the heart studied by means of simultaneous right and left ventricular function curves in the dog. Circulation 1954; 9: 706–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag, GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Pehrsson
    • 1
  • H. Åström
  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Thoracic ClinicsKarolinska HospitalStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations