Advertisement

Improving Phase-Based Disparity Estimation by Means of Filter Tuning Techniques

  • Ingo Ahrns
  • Heiko Neumann
Part of the Informatik aktuell book series (INFORMAT)

Abstract

Phase differencing techniques have been proven to be fast and robust methods for estimating disparity between two views. This disparity estimation depends on the quality of the local phase information which is a response of carefully designed frequency selective filter pairs for local phase estimation. Badly adjusted filter kernels yield responses with low amplitude and thus numerically instable phase information. In this paper we investigate the role of filter tuning to avoid singular points. We present a new iterative algorithm to optimally adjust the local phase estimating filters and compare the results with other phase differencing techniques as well as an instantaneous frequency driven filter tuning. Various experiments demonstrate that the iterative filter tuning technique shows improved performance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [AN98]
    I. Ahrns and H. Neumann. Combining Log-Polar Mapping and Gabor Filtering for Real-Time Depth Estimation. In Workshop Dynamische Perzeption, pages 119–126, Bielefeld, Germany, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. [CM97]
    L.D. Cai and J. Mayhew. A Note on Some Phase Differencing Algorithms for Disparity Estimation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 22 (2): 111–124, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [DA89]
    U. R. Dhond and J. K. Aggarwal. Structure From Stereo — A Review. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 19 (6): 1489–1510, 1989.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [FJ90]
    D. J. Fleet and A. D. Jepson. Computation of Component Image Velocity from Local Phase Information. International Journal of Computer Vision, 5 (1): 77–104, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [FJ93]
    D. J. Fleet and A. D. Jepson. Stability of Phase Information. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15 (12): 1253–1268, December 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [FJJ91]
    D. J. Fleet, A. D. Jepson, and M. R. M. Jenkin. Phase based disparity measurement. CVGIP, 53 (3): 198–210, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [HDS97]
    M. Hansen, K. Daniilidis, and G. Sommer. Optimizing of Stereo Disparity Estimation Using the Instantaneous frequency. In Proceedings of the 7th. International Conference on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns CAIP’97, pages 321–328, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. HS96] M. Hansen and G. Sommer. Active Depth Estimation with Gaze and Vergence Control Using Gabor Filters. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition ICPR’96, pages 287–291, Wien, Österreich, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. [JJT91]
    M. R. M. Jenkin, A. D. Jepson, and J. K. Tsotsos. Techniques for disparity measurement. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 53 (l): 14–30, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [San88]
    T. D. Sanger. Stereo Disparity Computation Using Gabor Filters. Biological Cybernetics, 59: 405–418, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [TM94]
    W. M. Theimer and H. Mallot. Phase-Based Binocular Vergence Control and Depth Reconstruction Using Active Vision. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 60 (3): 343–358, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [Wes95]
    C.-J. Westelius. Focus of Attention and Gaze Control for Robot Vision. PhD thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Sweden, 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingo Ahrns
    • 1
  • Heiko Neumann
    • 2
  1. 1.Research and TechnologyDaimler Benz AGUlmGermany
  2. 2.Dept. of Neural Inform. Proc.University of UlmUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations