Global Marine Gravity and Mean Sea Surface from Multi Mission Satellite Altimetry

  • Per Knudsen
  • Ole B. Andersen
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 119)

Abstract

Satellite altimetry from the GEOSAT and the ERS-1 geodetic missions provide altimeter data with a very dense coverage. Hence, the gravity field may be recovered very detailed. Satellite altimetry from the 35 days repeat cycle mission of the ERS satellites and, especially, from the 10 days repeat cycle TOPEX/POSEIDON satellite mission provide accurate mean sea surface heights along the ground tracks of those missions. In this study the global marine gravity field has been derived using the altimetry from the geodetic missions. This was done in small cells covering the worlds ocean using advanced techniques for crossover adjustment, gridding by local collocation, and conversion of sea surface heights into gravity by FFT. Then averaged sea surface heights of the repeat missions were used to construct an accurate mean sea surface. To enhance the resolution of the mean sea surface the altimetry from the geodetic missions was utilized. Marine geoid heights derived from the altimetric gravity was used for this task. The advantage of such a procedure is that inconsistences along the edges of the small cells may be avoided.

Keywords

Covariance Vale Gridding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, O. B., P. Knudsen & C.C. Tscherning, Investigation of methods for global gravity field recovery from dense ERS-1 geodetic mission altimetry. In: Global Gravity Field and its temporal variations. Ed.s: Rapp, Cazenave & Nerem, IAG Symposia no. 116, p. 218 – 226, Springer Verlag, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, O. B., and P. Knudsen, Global Marine Gravity Field from the ERS-1 and GEOSAT Geodetic Mission Altimetry, J. Geoph. Res., in press, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. Balmino, G., B. Moynot, M. Sarrailh and N. Vales, Free air gravity anomalies over the oceans from Seasat and Geos3 altimeter data, EOS, 68, (2), 17–18, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Forsberg R. and D. Solheim, Performance of FFT methods in local gravity field modelling. Proc. Chapman conference on progress in the determination of the earths gravity field, Edited by R. H. Rapp, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, 100–103, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. Hwang, C., and B. Parsons, Gravity Anomalies Derived from Seasat, Geosat, ERS-1, and TOPEX/POSEIDON Altimetry and Ship Gravity: A Case Study over the Reykjanes Ridge, Geophys. J. Int., 122, 551–568, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Knudsen, P., Simultaneous Estimation of the Gravity Field and Sea Surface Topography From Satellite Altimeter Data by Least Squares Collocation. Geophys. J. Int.l, Vol. 104, No. 2, 307–317, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Knudsen, P., and O. B. Andersen, Improved Recovery of the Global Marine Gravity Field from the GEOSAT and the ERS-1 Geodetic Mission Altimetry, in J. Segawa et al. (Eds.), Gravity, Geoid and Marine Geodesy, IAG symposia, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 429–436, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. Knudsen, P., O. B. Andersen, and C.C. Tscherning, Altimetric Gravity Anomalies in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea — Preliminary Results from the ERS-1 35 days Repeat Mission. Geophys. Res. Lett., 19(17), 1795–1798, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lemoine, F.G., D.E. Smith, R. Smith, L. Kunz, E.C. Pavlis, S.M. Klosko, D.S. Chinn, M.H. Torrence, R.G. Williamson, C.M. Cox, K.E. Rachlin, Y.M. Wang, S.C. Kenyon, R. Salman, R. Trimmer, R.H. Rapp, and R.S. Nerem, The development of the NASA GSFC and DMA joint geopotential model, in J. Segawa et al. (Eds.), Gravity, Geoid and Marine Geodesy, IAG symposia, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 461–469, 1997.Google Scholar
  10. Rummel, R., and R.H.N. Haagmans, Gravity Gradients fran Satellite Altimetry, Marine Geodesy, Marine Geodesy, 14, 1–12, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. Sandwell, D. T., Antarctic marine gravity field from high-density satellite altimetry, Geophys. J. Int., 109, 437–448, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schwarz, K.-P., M. G. Sideris, R. Forsberg: Use of FFT methods in Physical Geodesy. Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 100, 485–514, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tscherning, C.C., R. Forsberg, P. Knudsen, The GRAVSOFT package for geoid determination, Proc. First workshop on the European Geoid, Prague, May, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Per Knudsen
    • 1
  • Ole B. Andersen
    • 1
  1. 1.Kort & MatrikelstyrelsenCopenhagen NVDenmark

Personalised recommendations