Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cochlear Implant — heutiger Stand

  • Chapter
Book cover HNO Praxis heute

Part of the book series: HNO Praxis heute ((HNO,volume 18))

  • 51 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Als Burian in dieser Reihe 1983 über den aktuellen Stand der Cochlear-Implant-Forschung berichtete, standen noch andere Fragen im Mittelpunkt des Interesses (Burian 1983). Damals war die Forschung gerade soweit, erste Therapieversuche zuzulassen. Dies war ein enormer Fortschritt. Zwar wurde noch heftig gestritten, ob extra- oder intrakochleären Elektrodenimplantationen der Vorzug zu geben sei und ob analoge oder digitale Sprachverarbeitungsstrategien günstiger seien, jedoch waren sich alle Forscher darüber einig, daß die elektrische Stimulation des funktionstoten Innenohres möglich und somit auch die Entwicklung einer alltagstauglichen Hörprothese in greifbarer Nähe sei. Der Optimismus hat sich bestätigt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Aschendorff A, Marangos N, Laszig R (1997) Complications and reimplantation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 52:167–170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burian K (1983) Aktueller Stand der Cochlear Implant Forschung. In: Ganz H, Schätzle W (eds) HNO-Praxis Heute Bd 3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouard CH, Meyer B, Fugain C, Koca O (1995a) Clinical results for the DIGISONIC multichannel cochlear implant. Laryngoscope 105:505–509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chouard CH, Ouayoun M, Meyer B, Fugain C (1995b) Speech coding strategies of the digisonic fully digitized cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol 115/2:264–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark GM, Tong YC, Bailey OR et al. (1978) A multiple electrode cochlear implant. J Otolaryngol Soc Austral 4:208–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark GM, Shepherd RK, Franz BKHG et al. (1988) The histopathology of the human temporal bone and auditory central nervous system following cochlear implantation in a patient. Correlation of psychophysics and speech perception results. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) [Suppl 448]:1–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford A, Gibson W (1987) The anatomy of the round window with respect to cochlear implant insertion. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 96 [Suppl 128]:17–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings S, Groenewald E, Coetzee L, Hugo R, Van Derlinde M (1995) Speech production changes with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 166:394–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dillier N, Battmer RD, Döring WH, Müller-Deile J (1995) Multicentric field evaluation of a new speech coding strategy for cochlear implants. Audiology 24:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djourno A, Eyries C (1957) Prothèse auditive par excitation électrique à distance du nerf sensoriel à l’aide d’un bobinage inclus à demeure. Presse Méd 35:1417–1423

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell RC, Seligman PM, Blarney PJ, Clark GM (1987) Speech perception using a two-formant 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis in quiet and in noise. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 104:439–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle HJ, Doyle BJ, Turnbull FM (1964) Electrical stimulation of the eight cranial nerve. Arch Otolaryngol 80:388–391

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frau GN, Luxford WM, Lo WW, Berliner KI, Telischi FF (1994) High-resolution computed tomography in evaluation of cochlear patency in implant candidates: a comparison with surgical findings. J Laryngol Otol 108/9:743–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraysse B, Dillier N, Klenzner T et al. (1998) Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a european study. Am J Otol 18 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantz BJ, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ (1994) Intraoperative measures of electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potential. Am J Otol 15/2:137–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gattaz G, Battmer RD, Lehnhardt E, Gnadeberg D (1992) Beziehung zwischen dem elektrisch ausgelösten Stapediusreflex und der Unbehaglichkeitsschwelle bei Cochlear-Implant-Patienten. HNO 40:480–483

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Zierhofer C, Hochmair ES (1993) New hardware for analog and combined analog and pulsatile sound-encoding strategies. Progr Brain Res 97:291–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges AV, Schloffmann J, Balkany T (1997) Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 18:179–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman RA, Cohen NL (1995) Complications of cochlear implant surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 166:420–422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • House WF, Urban J (1973) Long term results of electrode implantation and electronic stimulation of the cochlea in man. Ann Otorhinolaryngol 82:504–517

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackler RK, Luxford WM, House WF (1987) Congenital malformations of the inner ear: a classification based on embryogenesis. Laryngoscope 97 [Suppl 40]:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackler RK, Leake PA, McKerrow WS (1989) Cochlear implant revision: effects of reimplantation on the cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 98/10:813–820

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy DW (1987) Multichannel intracochlear electrodes: mechanism of insertion trauma. Laryngoscope 97:42–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer J, Muller J, Pfennigdorff T et al. (1996) Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (MED-EL Combi-40) compared to the multipeak and spectral peak strategies (Nucleus). ORL 58/3:127–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klenzner T, Stecker M, Marangos N, Laszig R (1997) Indikationserweiterung des Cochlear Implant? Freiburger Ergebnisse bei Patienten mit Resthörigkeit. HNO 45:262

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehnhardt E (1993) Intrakochleare Plazierung der Cochlear Implant Elektroden in soft surgery technique. HNO 41:356–359

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehnhardt E, Battmer RD, Nakahodo K, Laszig R (1986) Cochlear Implants. HNO 34:271–279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehnhardt E, Bertram B (1991) Rehabilitation von CI-Kindern. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Linthicum FH, Fayad J, Otto SR, Galey FR, House WF (1991) Cochlear implant histopathology. Am J Otol 12:245–311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Löhle E (1991) Phoniatrische und pädaudiologische Ziele in der Erkennung, Diagnostik und Therapie resthöriger Kinder. Int. Symposium Hohenems 1990. Stiftung zur Förderung körperbehinderter Hochbegabter (Hrgs). Lichtenstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Marangos N (1987) Ergebnisse der Cochlea Implantation und ihre Bewertung. Dissertation, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

    Google Scholar 

  • Marangos N, Aschendorff A (1997) Congenital deformities of the inner ear: classification and aspects regarding cochlear implant surgery. Adv Oto Rhino Laryngol 52:52–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marangos N, Laszig R (1998) Cochlear Implant: Die prothetische Versorgung bei Taubheit um die Jahrtausendwende. HNO 46:12–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marangos N, Lüllwitz E, Laszig R (1995) Myogene Potentiale nach elektrischer Stimulation des Promontoriums. Otorhinolaryngol Nova 5:76–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh MA, Coker NJ, Jenkins HA (1992) Temporal bone histopathology of a patient with a nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. Am J Otol 13:241–248

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Vandali AE, Clark GM (1992) A comparison of speech perception of cochlear implantees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the MSP (MULTIPEAK) Processor. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 112:752–761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell EM, Jackler RK, Notta G, Linthicum FH (1987) Congenital malformations of the inner ear: histologic findings in five temporal bones. Laryngoscope 97 [Suppl 40]:18–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters S, Offeciers FE, Joris P, Moeneclaey L (1993a) The Laura cochlear implant programmed with the continuous interleaved and phase-locked continuous interleaved strategies. Adv Oto Rhino Laryngol 48:261–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters S, Offeciers FE, Kinsbergen J, van Durme M, van Enis P, Dijkmans P, Bouchataoui I (1993b) A digital speech processor and various speech encoding strategies for cochlear implants. Progr Brain Res 97:283–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Protokoll Ministerpräsidentenkonferenz der Länder vom 20.03.1997 — TOP 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter B, Spahn C, Zschocke I, Leuchter M, Löhle E, Laszig R (1997) Psychosoziale Belastungen in Familien eines mit einem CI versorgten Kindes. Jahrestag Deutschen Gesellschaft für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, Hannover 26.09.–28.09.1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler RA, Merzenich MM, White MW (1977) Multielectrode intracochlear implants — nerve survival and Stimulation patterns. Arch Otolaryngol 103:691–699

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JM (1985) Cochlear neuronal populations in developmental defects of the inner ear: implications for cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 99:14–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd RK, Clark GM (1991) Scanning electron microscopy of platinum scala tympani electrodes following chronic stimulation in patients. Biomaterials 12:417–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd RK, Clark GM, Black RC (1983) Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Physiological and histopathological results. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) [Suppl 399]:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd RK, Clark GM, Pyman BC, Webb RL (1985) Banded intracochlear electrode array: Evaluation of insertion trauma in human temporal bones. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 94:55–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd RK, Clark GM, Xu SA, Pyman BC (1995) Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque. Am J Otol 16/2:186–199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons FB (1967) Permanent intracochlear electrodes in cats. Tissue tolerance and cochlear microphonics. Laryngoscope 77:171–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner MW, Clark GM, Whitford LA et al. (1994) Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System. Am J Otol 15 [Suppl 2]:15–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Parkinson AJ, Lowder MW, Schum LK (1996) Initial independent results with the Clarion cochlear implant. Ear Hearing 17/6:528–538

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenberg E v, Brinch J, Kinsbergen J (1997) Ten years warranty. The benefit of proven reliability. In: Clark G (ed) Monduzzi, Bologna, pp 63–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltzman S, Cohen NL, William H, Shapiro MA (1992) Use of a multichannel cochlear implant in the congenitally and prelingually deaf population. Laryngoscope 102:395–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Gomolin RH, Shapiro WH, Ozdamar SR, Hoffman RA (1994) Long-term results of early cochlear implantation in congenitally and prelingually deafened children. Am J Otol 15 [Suppl 2]:9–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM (1991) Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352:236–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Shepherd RK, Millard RE, Clark GM (1997) Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study. Hearing Res 105:1–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zappia JJ, Niparko JK, Kemink JL, Oviatt DL, Altschuler RA (1991) Evaluation of the temporal bones of a multichannel cochlear implant patient. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 100:914–921

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zilberman Y, Santogrossi T (1995) Back-telemetry and the Clarion cochlear prosthesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 166:146–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zöllner F, Keidel W (1963) Gehörvermittlung durch elektrische Erregung des Nervus acusticus. Arch Oh Nas Kehlk Heilkd 181:216–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. R. Laszig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Marangos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universitätsstraße 34, D-35037, Marburg/Lahn, Deutschland

    Horst Ganz

  2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, D-66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland

    H. Iro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Laszig, R., Marangos, N. (1998). Cochlear Implant — heutiger Stand. In: Ganz, H., Iro, H. (eds) HNO Praxis heute. HNO Praxis heute, vol 18. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72188-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72188-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-72189-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72188-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation