Skip to main content

Immunological Methods in Small Animal Research

  • Chapter
  • 281 Accesses

Abstract

The replacement of diseased organs is an important part of medical therapy. Since the first successful kidney transplantation in a human being in 1955 [23], transplantation has been performed with increasing frequency and the outcome has improved. Despite the success of transplantation medicine and immunobiology over the past two decades, the immune response to the grafted organs is the major obstacle to successful long-term graft survival. Immunological aspects play a predominant role in transplantation research. The knowledge of mechanisms involved in graft rejection allows us to control the immune response to the graft without the necessity for lifelong immunosuppressive therapy. We know that the immunological reactions that occur after transplantation are the result of histoincompatibility between the donor and the recipient. However, the molecular mechanisms responsible for the induction of specific immunological tolerance to alloantigens, the important goal in transplantation research, are not completely understood. They are still being intensively investigated [37, 38]. Before strategies for tolerance induction can be translated into clinical practice, the immunobiological and molecular mechanisms involved have to be elucidated in experimental systems, such as small animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed SA, Gogal RM, Walsh JE (1994) A new rapid and simple non-radioactive assay to monitor and determine the proliferation of lymphocytes: an alternative to [3H]thymidine incorporation assay. J Immunol Methods 170:211–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ardavin C, Shortman K (1992) Cell surface marker analysis of mouse thymic dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol 22:859–862

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aujame L, Sodoyer R, Teillaud JL (1997) Phage display and antibody engineering: a French overview. Trends Biotechnol 15:155–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bach FH, Hirschhorn K (1964) Lymphocyte interaction. A potential histocompatibility test in vitro. Science 143:813–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bain B, Vas MR, Lowenstein L (1964) The development of large immature mononuclear cells in mixed lymphocyte cultures. Blood 23:108–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brunner KT, Mauel J, Cerottini MC, Chapuis B (1968) Quantitative assay of the lytic action of immune lymphoid cells on 51Cr-labelled allogeneic target cells in vitro; inhibition by isoantibody and by drugs. Immunology 14:181–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coligan JE, Kriusbeek AM, Margulis DH, Shevach EM, Strober W (eds) (1994) Current protocols in immunology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crispe IN, Mehal WZ (1996) Strange brew: T cells in the liver. Immunol Today 17:522–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Engvall E, Perlmann P (1971) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry 8:871–874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson S (1993) Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation. J Cell Biol 119:493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gill RG, Rosenberg AS, Lafferty KJ, Singer A (1989) Characterization of primary T cell subsets-mediated rejection of pancreatic islet grafts. J Immunol 143:2176–2178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heidecke CD, Hancock WW, Westerholt S, Sewczik T, Jakobs F, Zantl N, Varzaru A, Siegling A, Kurrle R, Deusch K, Volk HD, Kupiec-Weglinski JW (1996) α/β-T cell receptor-directed therapy in rat allograft recipients. Transplantation 61:948–956

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Iba Y, Kurosawa Y (1997) Comparison of strategies for the construction of libraries of artificial antibodies. Immunol Cell Biol 75:217–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Janeway CA, Travers P (1996) Immunobiology. The immune system in health and disease. Current Biology, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Julius MH, Simpson E, Herzenberg LA (1973) A rapid method for the isolation of functional thymus-derived murine lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 3:645–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kearsey JA, Stadnyk AW (1996) Isolation and characterization of highly purified rat intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes. J Immunol Methods 194:35–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Köhler G, Milstein C (1975) Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature 256:495–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Korzeniewski C, Callewaert DM (1983) An enzyme-release assay for natural cytotoxicity. J Immunol Methods 64:313–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lichtenfels R, Biddison WE, Schulz H, Vogt AB, Martin R (1994) CARE-LASS (calcein-release-assay), an improved fluorescence-based test system to measure cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity. J Immunol Methods 172:227–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Loken MR (1990) Immunofluorescence techniques in flow cytometry and sorting, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 341–353

    Google Scholar 

  21. Macatonia SE, Knight SC, Edwards AJ, Griffiths S, Fryer P (1987) Localization of antigen on lymph node dendritic cells after exposure to the contact sensitizer fluorescein isothiocyan-ate. Functional and morphological studies. J Exp Med 166:1654–1667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mage MG, McHugh LL, Rothstein TL (1977) Mouse lymphocytes with and without surface immunoglobulin: preparative scale separation in polystyrene tissue culture dishes coated with specifically purified anti-immunoglobulin. J Immunol Methods 15:47–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Merill JP, Murray JE, Harrison JH, Guild WR (1956) Successful homotransplantation of the human kidney between identical twins. JAMA 160:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mintz B, Silvers WK (1967) “Intrinsic” immunological tolerance in allophenic mice. Science 158:1484–1486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mosmann TR (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mosmann TR, Fong TA (1989) Specific assays for cytokine production by T cells. J Immunol Methods 116:151–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Piccotti JR, Chan SY, VanBuskirk AM, Eichwald EJ, Bishop DK (1997) Are Th2 helper T lymphocytes beneficial, deleterious, or irrelevant in promoting allograft survival? Transplantation 63:619–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Prussin C, Metcalfe DD (1995) Detection of intracytoplasmic cytokine using flow cytometry and directly conjugated anti-cytokine antibodies. J Immunol Methods 188:117–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pugh CW, MacPherson GG, Steer HW (1983) Characterization of nonlymphoid cells derived from rat peripheral lymph. J Exp Med 157:1758–1779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Qian S, Lu L, Fu F, Li Y, Li W, Starzl TE, Fung JJ, Thomson AW (1997) Apoptosis within spontaneously accepted mouse liver allografts. Evidence for deletion of cytotoxic T cells and implications for tolerance induction. J Immunol 158:4654–4661

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ricordi C (1995) Methods in cell transplantation. Landes, Austin, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rosenberg AS, Singer A (1992) Cellular basis of skin allograft rejection: an in vivo model of immun mediated tissue destruction. Annu Rev Immunol 10:333–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Singer A, Bach FH (1991) Allograft immunity: in vitro and in vivo studies. In: Bach FH, Auchincloss H (eds) Transplantation immunology. Wiley, New York, pp 105–111

    Google Scholar 

  34. Steinman RM, Kaplan G, Witmer MD, Cohn ZA (1979) Identification of a novel cell type in peripheral lymphoid organs of mice.V. Purification of spleen dendritic cells, new surface markers, and maintenance in vitro. J Exp Med 149:1–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sykes M (1996) Immunobiology of transplantation. FASEB J 10:721–730

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vermes I, Haanen C, Steffens-Nakken H, Reutelingsperger C (1995) A novel assay for apoptosis: flow cytometric detection of phosphatidylserine expression on early apoptotic cells using fluorescein-labelled Annexin V. J Immunol Methods 184:39–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Waldmann H, Cobbold S (1993) The use of monoclonal antibodies to achieve immunological tolerance. Immunol Today 14:247–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wood KJ (1996) New concepts in tolerance. Clin Transplant 10:93–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Otto, C., Gasser, M., Ulrichs, K. (1998). Immunological Methods in Small Animal Research. In: Timmermann, W., Gassel, HJ., Ulrichs, K., Zhong, R., Thiede, A. (eds) Organtransplantation in Rats and Mice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72140-3_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72140-3_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-72142-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72140-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics