Surgical Technique for Skin Transplantation in Mice

  • R. Kellersmann
  • R. Zhong


Much of the knowledge about the immunological and pathological mechanisms of graft rejection has been gained by experimental studies in allogeneic skin transplantation in mice. Since its detailed description by Billingham and Meda-war in 1951, it has been widely used to study the T cell mediated immune response of allograft rejection [1, 2]. The surgical procedure is easy to learn, does not need microsurgical equipment, and can be performed numerous times in a short period. Acute skin graft rejection is a striking and reproducible immunological reaction, and with some experience the time point of rejection can be determined accurately. This chapter describes the techniques of skin transplantation in mice currently used in our laboratory and discusses its applications.


Allograft Rejection Graft Rejection Minor Histocompatibility Antigen Native Skin Tail Skin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Billingham RE, Medawar PB (1951) The technique of free skin grafting in mammals. J Exp Biol 28:385–402Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Loveland BE, McKenzie IF (1982) Which T cells cause graft rejection? Transplantation 33:217–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mathieson BJ, Flaherty L, Bennett D, Boyse EA (1975) Differences in the rejection of trunk skin and tau skin allografts involving weak histocompatibility loci. Transplantation 19:525–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kubai L, Auerbach R (1980) Regional differences in the growth of skin transplants. Transplantation 30:128–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loveland BE, Henning MM (1996) Skin grafting in mice. Indicators of cell-mediated and humoral immunity. In: Green MK, Mandel TE (eds) Experimental transplantation models in small animals. Harwood, Chur, pp 195–211Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Margalit M, Belldegrün A, Berlatzky Y, Frenkel A, Cohen IR (1982) Experimental animal skin grafting simplified. J Immunol Methods 51:125–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hisatake G, Hammond E, Ives M, Griffith J, Shelby J, Eichwald EJ (1989) Hyperacute rejection of the transplanted mouse heart. Transplantation 47:996–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bailey DW (1982) How pure are inbred strains of mice? Immunol Today 3:210–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lazarovits AL, Poppema S, Zhang Z, Khandaker M, Le-Feuvre CE, Singhal SK, Garcia BM, Ogasa N, Jevnikar AM, White MH, Singh G, Stiller CR, Zhong RZ (1996) Prevention and reversal of renal allograft rejection by antibody against CD45RB. Nature 380:717–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Streilein JW, Bergstresser PR (1980) la antigens and epidermal Langerhans cells. Transplantation 30:319–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jackman SH, De Pirro E, Goldberg EH (1989) Immunohistochemical identification of skin antigens in mouse epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 93:46–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steinmuller D, Tyler JD (1983) Cross-priming reveals similar tissue restricted CTL-defined alloantigens on mouse, rat and human epidermal cells. Transplant Proc 15:238–241Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhong R, Lazarovits A Monoclonal antibody against CD45RB for the therapy of rejection and autoimmune diseases. J Mol Med (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Kellersmann
  • R. Zhong

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations