Skip to main content

Consensus Regarding Multiple-Day and Rescue Antiemetic Therapy

  • Conference paper
Perugia Consensus Conference on Antiemetic Therapy

Abstract

Different forms of moderately and highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy that are administered over several days per cycle are discussed with reference to the most efficacious antiemetic therapy. Both preventive and rescue antiemetic therapy are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basurto C, Rolla F, Tonato M et al (1989) Antiemetic activity of high-dose metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide alone in dacarbazine-treated cancer patients. Am J Clin Oncol 12: 235–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bremer K on behalf of the granisetron study group (1992) A single-blind study of the efficacy and safety of intravenous granisetron compared with alizapride plus dexamethasone in the prophylaxis and control of emesis in patients receiving 5-day cytostatic therapy. Eur J Cancer [A] 28: 1018–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buser KS, Joss RA, Piquet D et al (1993) Oral ondansetron in the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting induced by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in women with breast cancer. Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebocontrolled study. Ann Oncol 4: 474–479

    Google Scholar 

  4. deBoer M, de Wit R, Stoter G, Verweij J (1995) Possible lack of full cross-resistance of 5HT3 antagonists: a pilot study. Cancer Res Clin Oncol 121: 126–127

    Google Scholar 

  5. Depierre A, Lebeau B, Chevallier B et al (1996) Efficay of ondansetron, methylprednisolone plus metopimazine in patients previously incontrolled with dual therapy in cisplatin containing chemotherapy (abstract). Ann Oncol 7: 134

    Google Scholar 

  6. Domínguez-Ortega L, Cubedo-Cervera R, Cortés-Funés H, Díaz-Gallego E (1996) Sleep protects against chemotherapy induces emesis. Cancer 77: 1566–1570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Falkson C, Falkson H (1995) Antiemetic efficacy of tropisetron in patients failing previous antiemetic therapy. Oncology 52: 427–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox SM, Einhorn LH, Cox E et al (1993) Ondansetron versus ondansetron, dexamethasone, and chlorpromazine in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with multiple-day cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 11: 2391–2395

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Einhorn LH, Naggy C, Werner K et al (1990) Ondansetron: a new antiemetic for patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 8: 731–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hainsworth JD (1992) The use of ondansetron in patients receiving multiple-day cisplatin regimens. Semin Oncol 19: 48–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Herman TS, Einhorn LH, Jones SE et al (1979) Superiority of nabilone over prochlorperazine as an antiemetic in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 300: 1295–1297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (1992) Ondansetron + dexamethasone versus metoclopramide + dexamethasone + diphenhydramine in prevention of cisplatin induced emesis. Lancet 340: 96–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Levitt M, Warr D,Yelle L et al (1993) Ondansetron compared with dexamethasone and metoclopramide as antiemetics in the chemotherapy of breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil. N Engl J Med 328: 1081–1084

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mantovani G, Macciò A, Alessandro B, Curelli L, Ghiani M, Proto E (1996) Comparison of granisetron versus ondansetron versus tropisetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin for the treatment of head and neck cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 77: 941–948

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nicolai N, Mangiarotti B, Salvioni R et al (1993) Dexamethasone plus ondansetron versus dexamethasone plus alizapride in the prevention of emesis induce by cisplatincontaining chemotherapies for urological cancers. Eur Urol 23: 450–456

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rath U, Upadhyaya BK, Arechavala E, et al (1993) Role of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in fractionated chemotherapy. Oncology 50: 168–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sledge GW, Einhorn LH, Nagy C et al (1992) Phase III double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron and metoclopramide as antiemetic therapy for patients receiving multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Cancer 70: 2524–2528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tyson LB, Clark RA, Gralla RJ (1982) High dose metoclopramide: control of dacarbazine-induced emesis in a preliminary trial. Cancer Treat Rep 66: 2108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

De Mulder, P.H.M., Roila, F., Kris, M.G., Marty, M.M. (1998). Consensus Regarding Multiple-Day and Rescue Antiemetic Therapy. In: Gralla, R.J., Tonato, M., Roila, F. (eds) Perugia Consensus Conference on Antiemetic Therapy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72137-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72137-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-72139-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72137-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics