Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Längsschnittuntersuchung der Kontinenz nach totaler und subtotaler Rektumresektion mit coloanaler Pouchanlage und direkter coloanaler Anastomose

  • Conference paper
Pouch

  • 49 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Nach totaler oder subtotaler Rektumresektion mit coloanaler oder tiefer colorektaler Anastomose treten bei etwa 50% der Patienten nach Angaben in der Literatur Konti-nenzstörungen auf [3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 15, 18, 19, 22, 26].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bernard D, Morgan S, Tasse D, Wassef R (1989) Preliminary results of colo anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 32:580–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cavaliere F, Pemberton JH, Cosimelli M, Fazio VW, Beart RW Jr (1995) Coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38:807–812

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Drake DB, Pemberton JH, Beart RW, Dozois RR, Wolff BG (1987) Coloanal anastomosis in the management of benign and malignant rectal disease. Ann Surg 206:600–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eigler FW, Gross E (1988) Kontinenzleistung nach totaler und subtotaler Rektumresektion mit peranaler Anastomosierung. In: Häring R (Hrsg) Postoperative Folgezustände. S. 399–406. Wien: Überreuther Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  5. Enker WE, Stearns MW, Janov AJ (1985) Peranal coloanal anastomosis following low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 28:576–581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Farouk R, Drew PJ, Duthie GS, Lee PWR, Monson JRT (1996) Disruption of the internal anal sphincter con occur after transanal stapling. Br J Surg 83:1400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. von Flüe MO, Degen LP, Beglinger Ch, Hellwig ACh, Rothenbühler JM, Harder FH (1996) Ileocecal reservoir reconstruction with physiologic function after total mesorectal cancer excision. Ann Surg 224:204–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gross E, Beersiek F, Eigler FW (1980) Sphinkterfunktion nach peranalen Anastomosen. Langen-becks Arch Chir 353:207–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gross E, Amir-Kabirian H (1994) Koloanaler Pouch nach totaler Rektumresektion. Zentralbl Chir 119:878–885

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guillemot F, Leroy J, Boniface M, Hirschauer Ch, Mudry J, Lamblin MD, Quandalle P, Marti R, Cortot A (1991) Functional assessment of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir and excision of the anal transition zone. Dis Colon Rectum 34:967–972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hallböök O, Pahlman L, Krog M, Wexner St, Sjödahl R (1996) Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 224:58–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho YH, Tan M, Seow-Choen F (1996) Prospective randomized controlled study of clinical function and anorectal physiology after low anterior resection: comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomoses. Br J Surg 83:978–980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Horgan PG, O’Connell PR, Shinkwin CA, Kirwan WO (1989) Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 76:783–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jostarndt L, Thiede A, Lau G, Hamelmann H (1984) Anorectale Kontinenz nach manueller und maschineller Anastomosennaht: Ergebnisse einer kontrollierten Studie in der Rektumchirurgie. Chirurg 55:385–390

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Karanjia ND, Schache DJ, Heald RJ (1992) Function of the distal rectum after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Br J Surg 79:114–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H, Hatada T, Fujita S, Sakanoue Y, Yamamura T, Utsunomiya J (1991) Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 78:1434–1438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lazorthes F et al (1984) Construction of a rectal pouch after colo-anal anastomosis. Strasbourg: International Society of University and Rectal Surgeons

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lazorthes F, Chiotasso P, Gamagami RA, Istvan G, Chevreau P (1997) Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 84:1449–1451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson BM, Finan PJ, Johnston D (1992) Role of the rectum in the physiologic and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 79:1082–1086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicholls RJ, Lubowski DZ, Donaldson DR (1988) Comparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excision. Br J Surg 75:318–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pappalardo G, Toccaceli S, Dionisio P, Castrini G, Ravo B (1988) Preoperative and postoperative evaluation by manometric study of the anal sphincter after colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 31:119–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Parks AG, Percy JP (1982) Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 69:301–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pedersen K, Hint K, Olsen J, Christiansen J, Jensen P, Mortensen PE (1986) Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Ann Surg 205:133–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams NS, Price R, Johnston D (1980) The long term effect of sphincter preserving operations for rectal carcinoma on function of the anal sphincter in man, Br J Surg 67:203–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wunderlich M, Karner-Hanusch J, Schiessl R (1986) Results of coloanal anastomosis, A prospective study. Int J Colorect Dis 1:157–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. N. Vollberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Gross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Amir Kabirian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland

    V. Schumpelick  & E. Schippers  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vollberg, N., Gross, E., Kabirian, H.A. (1998). Längsschnittuntersuchung der Kontinenz nach totaler und subtotaler Rektumresektion mit coloanaler Pouchanlage und direkter coloanaler Anastomose. In: Schumpelick, V., Schippers, E. (eds) Pouch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72132-8_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72132-8_65

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-72133-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72132-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation