The Idea of Economic Order in Contemporary Russia

  • Konstantin S. Pigrov
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy book series (SEEP)


The terms considered in the present paper do not seem to be generally accepted. They have not appeared yet in dictionaries and reference literature. Before starting the discussions of economic order, it must be necessary to point out that the basic concept has not been defined yet.1 Besides, the usage of the terms in German and Russian scientific communities differs both in contexts and in connotations. That is why the methodological and terminological basis of the presented research seems to quite essential.


Social Order Production Force Economic Order National Survival Russian Philosopher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    See for example: V. Altukhov: “O Smene Poriadkov v Mirovom Obchestvennom Razvitii” (On Changes of Orders in the World Social Development), Mirovaya Ekonornika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenia (World Economy and International Relations), 4, Moscow (Nauka) 1995, p. 57.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See: Brockhaus: Enzyklopädie in Zwanzig Bänden, B.16, (F. A. Brockhaus Wiesbaden) 1991; Bolshaya Sovetskaya Entsyklopediya, Third Edition, Moscow (Sovetskaya Entsyklopediya), vol. 20, 1975, pp. 405–406.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See for example: Jan Tinbergen: Peresmotr Mezhdunarodnogo Poriadka, Moscow (Progress) 1980. Original: Reshaping the International Order: a report to the club of Rome, in: National Union Catalog 1973–1977, New York (Dutton) 1976.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu. Levada: “Structura Sotsialnaya” (Social Structure), in: Philosophskaya Entsyklopediya, vol. 5, Moscow (Sovetskaya Entsyklopediya) 1970 p. 142.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Andreeva: “Zakonomernost Obshchestvennaya” (Social Appropriateness), in: Philosophskaya Entsyklopediya, vol. 2, Moscow (Sovetskaya Entsyklopediya) 1962, p. 153.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. L. Frank: “Dukhovnye Osnovy Obchestva. Vvedenie v Sotsialnuyu Filosofiyu” (Moral Foundations of a Society. Introduction to Social Philosophy), in: Iz Istorii Russkoi Sotsialnoi i Pravovoi Mysli. Russkoe Zarubezhie, Leningrad (Lenizdat) 1991, p. 418.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See, for example: N. I. Kareev: Sushchnosi Istoricheskogo Protsessa i Rol Lichnosti v Istorii (The Essence of the Historic Process and the Role of a Personality in History), Moscow (Mamontov) 1914.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Smith: Issledovanie o Prirode i Prichinah Bogatstva Narodov, Moscow (Sotsecguis) 1962, p. 26.Google Scholar
  9. 8a.
    Original: Adam Smith: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London (World Lock &Co.) 1812.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    See for example: F. Engels: “Proiskhozhdenie Semyi, Chastnoi Sobstvennosti i Gosudarstva”, in: K. Marx, F. Engels: Sochineniya, 2nd edition, vol. 21, p. 173–174. Original: Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und der Staats. Im Anschluss an Lewis H. Morgans Forschungen von Friedrich Engels, Hoeffigen-Zuerich (Verlag der Schweizerischen Volksbuchhandlung) 1884.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    See for example: R. Shtammler: Khoziaistvo i Pravo s Tochki Zreniya Materialisticheskogo Ponimaniya Istorii (Sotsialno-Filosofskoye Issledovanie), vol. 1,2, St.Petersburg (without publisher) 1899, 1907.Google Scholar
  12. 10a.
    Original: R. Stammler: Wirtschaft und Recht Nach der materialistischen Geschichtauffassung. Eine socialphilosohische Untersuchung, Leipzig (Veit) 1896.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    See an intersting analysis: J. Netopilik: “Zur Subjet-Object Beziehung im Sozialismus”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2 (1972), p. 1454.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    M. Weber: “Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Capitalismus”, in: M. Weber: Gesammelte Aufsaetze zur Religionssoziologie, Bd. 1, Tübingen (J. C. B. Mohr) 1920.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    Komsomolskaya Pravda, November 1, 1990, special issue.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    In the Soviet period some interesting investigations were conducted. They are almost unknown in the West. For example: R. I. Kosolapov: Kommunisticheskiy Trud: Priroda i Stimuly (Communist Labour: The Nature and the Stimuli), Moscow (Mysl) 1968;Google Scholar
  17. 14a.
    G. S. Grigoriev: TrudPervaya Chelovecheskaya Potrebnost. Dialektika Protsessa Truda (Labour as the First Human Need. The Dialectics of the Process of Labour), Perm (Kn. Izd.) 1965;Google Scholar
  18. 14b.
    M. I. Zaitseva: Tvorchestvo kak Tsennost i kak Motiv (na Primere Truda Ingenerno-Tehnicheskih Rabotnikov) (Creativity as a Value and as a Motive), Moscow (Soviet Sociological Association) 1979.Google Scholar
  19. 15.
    J. de Maistre: “A Letter to Mr. P. B. Koslovsky about the Russia of 1815”, in: Russkii Archiv. Istoriko-Literaturnyi Sbornik, Moscow (Chertkov’s Library Edition) 1866, pp. 1502–1503.Google Scholar
  20. 16.
    V. V. Rosanov: “Apokalipsis Nashego Vremeni” (The Apocalypse of Our Time), in: V. V. Rosanov: Uedinennoe (The Secluded), Moscow (Sovremennik) 1991, pp. 90–91.Google Scholar
  21. 17.
    S. N. Bulgakov: Filosofia Khozyaistva (Philosophy of the Economy), in: S. N. Bulgakov: Sochineniya (Works), vol. 1, Moscow (Nauka) 1991.Google Scholar
  22. 18.
    M. K. Gandhi: “‘Hind Svaradge’, ili Indiiskoe Samoupravlenie” (Hind Svaradge or Indian Self-Government), in: M. K. Gandhi: Moya Zhizn (My Life), Moscow (Nauka) 1969, p. 442.Google Scholar
  23. 18a.
    Original: M. K. Gandhi: An Autobiography; or, the Story of My Experiments with Truth, Ahmedabad (Navajivan Publishing House) 1948.Google Scholar
  24. 19.
    L. N. Tolstoi: Gibel Tsivilizatsii i Predstoyatschii Perevorot (Iz Byvshih pod Zapretom Sochinenii L. N. Tolstogo o Nashem Vremeni) (The Downfall of the Civilization and the Coming Coup), Riga (Without publisher) without year, p. 6.Google Scholar
  25. 20.
  26. 21.
    E. N. Trubetskoi: “Otechestvennaya Voina i Yeyo Dukhovnyi Smysl” (Patriotic War and its Spiritual Meaning), in: E. N. Trubetskoi: Smysl Zhizni (The Purport of Life), Moscow (Respublika) 1994, p. 381.Google Scholar
  27. 22.
    Rosanov: op. cit., p. 90–91.Google Scholar
  28. 23.
    Trubetskoi: op. cit., p. 393.Google Scholar
  29. 24.
    See, for example, Frank: ibid. Google Scholar
  30. 25.
    See: I. Ruvinsky: “2000 God Glazami Shestidesyatyh i Vosmidesyatyh” (The Year of 2000 Seen by the 60s and 80s), Znanie-Sila, 12, Moscow (Molodaya Gvardia) 1984. It was shown in this paper how naive, enthusiastic, full of uncoditional faith in the absolute might of science the authors of the 60s were. And the CPSU Programme of 1961 was also full of enthusiam over the scientific and tehcnological progress. It was this enthusiasm that allowed to promise to accomplish building material and technological basis of communism by 1980. The matter was not only in the voluntarism of N. S. Khrushchev. This was the general prevailing mood both here and in the West.Google Scholar
  31. 26.
    D. H. Meadows, D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, W. W. Behrens: The Limits to Growth, New York (Universe Books) 1989.Google Scholar
  32. 27.
    V. Taylor: “The End of the Oil Age”, Ecologist, 8/9, vol. 10, Wadebridge (1980), p. 303.Google Scholar
  33. 28.
    Fidel Castro Ruz: La crisis ecoonmic y social del mundo. Sus repercusiones en lospaises subdesarrollados, sus perspectivas sombrialy la necessidad de luchar si gueremos sobrevivir, La Habana (Oficio de Publ. De Conseijo de Estando) 1983. Another apporach, but the same thesis:Google Scholar
  34. 28a.
    I. Shafarevich: “Dve Dorogui k Odnomu Obryvu” (Two Roads to the Same Precipice), Novyi Mir, 7, Moscow (Izvestiya) 1989.Google Scholar
  35. 29.
    R. K. Balandin: Geologgicheskaya Deyatelnost Chelovechestva. Tekhnoggenes (Geological Activities of Mankind. Technogenesis), Minsk (Nauka i Tekhnika) 1978.Google Scholar
  36. 30.
    Z. Staikov: “Nauchno-Tekhnicheskata Revolutsiya — Sotsiologicheski Problemy” (Science and Technology Revolution — Sociological Problems), Sotsiologicheskiproblemy, 3, Sofia (1976), pp. 15–27.Google Scholar
  37. 31.
    V. V. Kocheryguin: “K Voprosu ob Effectivnosti Zameny Zhivogo Truda Mashinnym” (On the Efficiency of Using Machine Labour Instead of Human Labour), Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Ekonomicheskaya Seriya, 5 (1982), p. 41–53.Google Scholar
  38. 32.
    W. F. Miller: New Developments in Technology and Their Implications for Developed and Developing Countries, (SRI International) 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin • Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konstantin S. Pigrov

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations