Abstract
The terms considered in the present paper do not seem to be generally accepted. They have not appeared yet in dictionaries and reference literature. Before starting the discussions of economic order, it must be necessary to point out that the basic concept has not been defined yet.1 Besides, the usage of the terms in German and Russian scientific communities differs both in contexts and in connotations. That is why the methodological and terminological basis of the presented research seems to quite essential.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
See for example: V. Altukhov: “O Smene Poriadkov v Mirovom Obchestvennom Razvitii” (On Changes of Orders in the World Social Development), Mirovaya Ekonornika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenia (World Economy and International Relations), 4, Moscow (Nauka) 1995, p. 57.
See: Brockhaus: Enzyklopädie in Zwanzig Bänden, B.16, (F. A. Brockhaus Wiesbaden) 1991; Bolshaya Sovetskaya Entsyklopediya, Third Edition, Moscow (Sovetskaya Entsyklopediya), vol. 20, 1975, pp. 405–406.
See for example: Jan Tinbergen: Peresmotr Mezhdunarodnogo Poriadka, Moscow (Progress) 1980. Original: Reshaping the International Order: a report to the club of Rome, in: National Union Catalog 1973–1977, New York (Dutton) 1976.
Yu. Levada: “Structura Sotsialnaya” (Social Structure), in: Philosophskaya Entsyklopediya, vol. 5, Moscow (Sovetskaya Entsyklopediya) 1970 p. 142.
G. Andreeva: “Zakonomernost Obshchestvennaya” (Social Appropriateness), in: Philosophskaya Entsyklopediya, vol. 2, Moscow (Sovetskaya Entsyklopediya) 1962, p. 153.
S. L. Frank: “Dukhovnye Osnovy Obchestva. Vvedenie v Sotsialnuyu Filosofiyu” (Moral Foundations of a Society. Introduction to Social Philosophy), in: Iz Istorii Russkoi Sotsialnoi i Pravovoi Mysli. Russkoe Zarubezhie, Leningrad (Lenizdat) 1991, p. 418.
See, for example: N. I. Kareev: Sushchnosi Istoricheskogo Protsessa i Rol Lichnosti v Istorii (The Essence of the Historic Process and the Role of a Personality in History), Moscow (Mamontov) 1914.
A. Smith: Issledovanie o Prirode i Prichinah Bogatstva Narodov, Moscow (Sotsecguis) 1962, p. 26.
Original: Adam Smith: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London (World Lock &Co.) 1812.
See for example: F. Engels: “Proiskhozhdenie Semyi, Chastnoi Sobstvennosti i Gosudarstva”, in: K. Marx, F. Engels: Sochineniya, 2nd edition, vol. 21, p. 173–174. Original: Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und der Staats. Im Anschluss an Lewis H. Morgans Forschungen von Friedrich Engels, Hoeffigen-Zuerich (Verlag der Schweizerischen Volksbuchhandlung) 1884.
See for example: R. Shtammler: Khoziaistvo i Pravo s Tochki Zreniya Materialisticheskogo Ponimaniya Istorii (Sotsialno-Filosofskoye Issledovanie), vol. 1,2, St.Petersburg (without publisher) 1899, 1907.
Original: R. Stammler: Wirtschaft und Recht Nach der materialistischen Geschichtauffassung. Eine socialphilosohische Untersuchung, Leipzig (Veit) 1896.
See an intersting analysis: J. Netopilik: “Zur Subjet-Object Beziehung im Sozialismus”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2 (1972), p. 1454.
M. Weber: “Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Capitalismus”, in: M. Weber: Gesammelte Aufsaetze zur Religionssoziologie, Bd. 1, Tübingen (J. C. B. Mohr) 1920.
Komsomolskaya Pravda, November 1, 1990, special issue.
In the Soviet period some interesting investigations were conducted. They are almost unknown in the West. For example: R. I. Kosolapov: Kommunisticheskiy Trud: Priroda i Stimuly (Communist Labour: The Nature and the Stimuli), Moscow (Mysl) 1968;
G. S. Grigoriev: Trud — Pervaya Chelovecheskaya Potrebnost. Dialektika Protsessa Truda (Labour as the First Human Need. The Dialectics of the Process of Labour), Perm (Kn. Izd.) 1965;
M. I. Zaitseva: Tvorchestvo kak Tsennost i kak Motiv (na Primere Truda Ingenerno-Tehnicheskih Rabotnikov) (Creativity as a Value and as a Motive), Moscow (Soviet Sociological Association) 1979.
J. de Maistre: “A Letter to Mr. P. B. Koslovsky about the Russia of 1815”, in: Russkii Archiv. Istoriko-Literaturnyi Sbornik, Moscow (Chertkov’s Library Edition) 1866, pp. 1502–1503.
V. V. Rosanov: “Apokalipsis Nashego Vremeni” (The Apocalypse of Our Time), in: V. V. Rosanov: Uedinennoe (The Secluded), Moscow (Sovremennik) 1991, pp. 90–91.
S. N. Bulgakov: Filosofia Khozyaistva (Philosophy of the Economy), in: S. N. Bulgakov: Sochineniya (Works), vol. 1, Moscow (Nauka) 1991.
M. K. Gandhi: “‘Hind Svaradge’, ili Indiiskoe Samoupravlenie” (Hind Svaradge or Indian Self-Government), in: M. K. Gandhi: Moya Zhizn (My Life), Moscow (Nauka) 1969, p. 442.
Original: M. K. Gandhi: An Autobiography; or, the Story of My Experiments with Truth, Ahmedabad (Navajivan Publishing House) 1948.
L. N. Tolstoi: Gibel Tsivilizatsii i Predstoyatschii Perevorot (Iz Byvshih pod Zapretom Sochinenii L. N. Tolstogo o Nashem Vremeni) (The Downfall of the Civilization and the Coming Coup), Riga (Without publisher) without year, p. 6.
Ibid.
E. N. Trubetskoi: “Otechestvennaya Voina i Yeyo Dukhovnyi Smysl” (Patriotic War and its Spiritual Meaning), in: E. N. Trubetskoi: Smysl Zhizni (The Purport of Life), Moscow (Respublika) 1994, p. 381.
Rosanov: op. cit., p. 90–91.
Trubetskoi: op. cit., p. 393.
See, for example, Frank: ibid.
See: I. Ruvinsky: “2000 God Glazami Shestidesyatyh i Vosmidesyatyh” (The Year of 2000 Seen by the 60s and 80s), Znanie-Sila, 12, Moscow (Molodaya Gvardia) 1984. It was shown in this paper how naive, enthusiastic, full of uncoditional faith in the absolute might of science the authors of the 60s were. And the CPSU Programme of 1961 was also full of enthusiam over the scientific and tehcnological progress. It was this enthusiasm that allowed to promise to accomplish building material and technological basis of communism by 1980. The matter was not only in the voluntarism of N. S. Khrushchev. This was the general prevailing mood both here and in the West.
D. H. Meadows, D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, W. W. Behrens: The Limits to Growth, New York (Universe Books) 1989.
V. Taylor: “The End of the Oil Age”, Ecologist, 8/9, vol. 10, Wadebridge (1980), p. 303.
Fidel Castro Ruz: La crisis ecoonmic y social del mundo. Sus repercusiones en lospaises subdesarrollados, sus perspectivas sombrialy la necessidad de luchar si gueremos sobrevivir, La Habana (Oficio de Publ. De Conseijo de Estando) 1983. Another apporach, but the same thesis:
I. Shafarevich: “Dve Dorogui k Odnomu Obryvu” (Two Roads to the Same Precipice), Novyi Mir, 7, Moscow (Izvestiya) 1989.
R. K. Balandin: Geologgicheskaya Deyatelnost Chelovechestva. Tekhnoggenes (Geological Activities of Mankind. Technogenesis), Minsk (Nauka i Tekhnika) 1978.
Z. Staikov: “Nauchno-Tekhnicheskata Revolutsiya — Sotsiologicheski Problemy” (Science and Technology Revolution — Sociological Problems), Sotsiologicheskiproblemy, 3, Sofia (1976), pp. 15–27.
V. V. Kocheryguin: “K Voprosu ob Effectivnosti Zameny Zhivogo Truda Mashinnym” (On the Efficiency of Using Machine Labour Instead of Human Labour), Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Ekonomicheskaya Seriya, 5 (1982), p. 41–53.
W. F. Miller: New Developments in Technology and Their Implications for Developed and Developing Countries, (SRI International) 1985.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin • Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pigrov, K.S. (1998). The Idea of Economic Order in Contemporary Russia. In: Koslowski, P. (eds) The Social Market Economy. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72129-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72129-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-72131-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72129-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive