Advantages Afforded by Miniaturization and Integration of DNA Analysis Instrumentation

  • M. Allen Northrup
  • Bill Benett
  • Dean Hadley
  • Paul Stratton
  • Phoebe Landre
Conference paper

Abstract

Miniaturization of chemical reaction chambers, along with the integration with low-cost detection components for real-time product quantification allows for significant improvements in instrumentation. Bulk chemical reactions can benefit from increased control at the microscopic level, according to the general volumetric reaction formula:
$$ Q\, = \,1/U\int_{qr} {dU} $$
where, Q is the volumetric reaction rate (moles/time · volume), U is the volume, and qris the “point” reaction rate at a “microscopic” volume unit. This equation is only valid if everything is uniform at a microscopic scale, that is, the reaction is working equally at all points. This uniformity is difficult to maintain, especially in reactions that have: 1) multiple co-reactants, 2) narrow and uniform condition (i.e., (temperature and pH) requirements, 3) macromolecular biological components, such as enzymes, and 4) diffusion limiting conditions. Typically, bulk bioreactors require significant effort to maintain such uniformity and often are difficult to scale up as a result. Arrays of miniaturized reactors with individual control can replace the less effective bulk systems, provide better uniformity, and therefore increase productivity.

Keywords

Titanium Depression Silane Chloroform Boron 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    K. Mullis and F. Falonna, “Specific Synthesis of DNAin vitro via a Polymerase- Catalyzed Chain Reaction”, Methods in Enzymology, 155 (1987) 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. K. Saiki, D.H. Gelfand, S. Stoeffel, S.J. Scharf, R. Higuchi, G.T. Horn, K.B. Mullis, and H.A. Erlich, “Primer-directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase”, Science, 239 (1988) 487–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. A. Gibbs, “DNA Amplification by the Polymerase Chain Reaction,” Anal. Chem., 62(1990) 1202–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M.A. Northrup, M.T. Ching, R.M. White, and R.T. Watson, “DNA Amplification in a Microfabricated Reaction Chamber”, inTransducers ‘93, Seventh International Conference on Solid State Sensors and Actuators, Yokohama, Japan, ISBN 4–9900247-2–9 (1993) 924–927.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    M.A. Northrup, R.F. Hills, P. Landre, S. Lehew, D. Hadley, R. Watson “A MEMS- based DNA Analysis System”, in Transducers95, Eighth International Conference on Solid State Sensors and Actuators, Stockholm, Sweden, (1995) 764–767.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Northrup M.A., Beeman B., R.F. Hadley, D. Landre, P. Lehew, Integrated Miniature DNA-based Analytical Instrument. In Anal. Methods and Instrumentation. Special Issue on MicroTAS. H. M. Widmer (ed) c/o Ciba Geigy, Basel, Nov. 1996, pp 153–157.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Northrup, M.A., Beeman, B., R.F. Hadley, D. Landre, P. Lehew, A Miniature Integrated Nucleic Acid Analysis System, In Automation of DNA Sequencing Technologies. T. Beugalstock (ed). J. Wiley and Sons, New York (1997). Chapter 9.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. Wilding, M.A. Shiffner, L. J. Kricka, Clin. Chem. 1994, 40, 1815–1818.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. Cheng, M.A. Shoffner, G.E. Hvichia, L. J. Kricka, Nucleic Acid Res., 1996, 24, 380–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M.A. Burns, C.H. Mastrangelo, T.S.Sammarco, F.P. Man, J.R Webster, B.N. Foerster, D, Jones, Y. Fields, A.R. Kaiser, D.T. Burke, 1996, 93, 5556–5561.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    M.A. Northrup, B. Beeman, P. Landre, D. Hadley, J. J. Sninsky, R. Watson, M. Fisher, and.D. Oldach, “Real-time, Quantitative Detection of HIV RNA in Human Plasma and Tissue.” (1997) (In Press). Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    C.T. Wittwer, G. C. Fillmore, and D. J. Garling, “Minimizing the Time Required for DNA Amplification by Efficient Heat Transfer to Small Samples”,Anal. Biochem. 186 (1990) 328–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. Higuchi, C. Fockler, G. Davinger, and R. Watson, “Kinetic PCR Analysis: Realtime Monitoring of DNA Amplification Reactions”, Bio/Technology, 11 (1993)1026–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    P. Holland, R.D. Abramson, R. Watson, D.H. Gelfand, “Detection of Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction Product by Utilizing the 5’ to 3’ Exonuclease Activity of Thermus aquaticus DNA Polymerase”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88 (1991) 7276–7280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    L. G. Lee, C.R. Connelly and W. Bloch., “Allelic Discrimination by Nick-Translation PCR with Fluorogenic Probes”. Nucl. Acids Res., 21 (1993) 3761–3766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    K.J. Livak, S.J.A. Flood, J. Marmaro, W. Giusti, and K. Deetz, “Oligonucelotides with Fluorescent Dyes at Opposite Ends Provide a Quenched Probe System Useful for Detecting PCR Product and Nucleic Acid Hybridization”, PCR Methods and Apps., Vol. XX (1995) 357–362.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    A.T. Woolley, D. Hadley, P. Landre, A.J. deMello, R.A. Mathies, and M.A. Northrup, “Functional Integration of PCR Amplification and Capillary Electrophoresis in a Microfabricated DNA Analysis Device.” Anal. Chem., 68, 1996,4081–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Allen Northrup
    • 1
  • Bill Benett
    • 1
  • Dean Hadley
    • 1
  • Paul Stratton
    • 1
  • Phoebe Landre
    • 1
  1. 1.Lawrance Livermore National LaboratoryMicrotechnology CenterLivemoreUSA

Personalised recommendations