Fluid-Dynamic Effects, Including Turbulence, on a High-Pressure Discharge

  • O. Biblarz
  • J. L. Barto
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 15)


We have been studying the stabilization of discharges by flow phenomena for a number of years, and although more interested in molecular gas discharges as typified by the CO2-laser, broad classifications must be introduced in order to discuss relevant phenomena. The first and perhaps most important classification relates to the existence of negative ions and, while our work has been with electron-attaching gases, we shall also mention non-attaching gases such as nitrogen and the inert gases. Next we distinguish between parallel flow and cross flow as they pertain to the direction of the overall motion of the fluid with respect to the conventional motion of the electrical current. In parallel flow the movement is coaxial and we consider flows going both from anode to cathode (normal mode) and from cathode to anode (reverse flow). Turbulence generating grids are located upstream of the electrodes as shown In Fig. 1, except for the reverse flow where they become ineffective. Because the electrodes are immersed In the flow, the anode is typically made of an array of pins, or a pin-rake, supported in some suitable streamlined fashion. On the other hand, the cathode is a screen or some other device which presents low blockage to the main flow while serving as an electrical “flat-plate”. The gas pressures can be said to be moderate to high although In our own work we operate exclusively near one atmosphere; flow rates are subsonic and intercavity volumes large. Part of our effort has been to vary Interelectrode spacing and to exchange anode pins for anode wires spanning the cross-section.


Reverse Flow Breakdown Voltage Parallel Flow Slip Parameter Anode Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A.C. Eckbreth and F.S. Owen: Rev. Sci. Instrum. 43, 995 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.V. Bondarenko, B.S. Golubev, E.V. Dan’shchikov, F.V. Lebedev, and A.V. Ryazanov: Sov. J. Plasma Fhys. 5(3). 386 (1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.L. Ream: Laser Focus 18, A3 (1982); also, Laser Focus 22 No 5 pg 24 and 22 No 6 pg 26 (1986).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.S. Sigmond: “Corona Discharges” in Electrical Breakdown of Gases. Meek and Craags Eds. ( Wiley, New York 1978 )Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.I. Ivanchenko, R.I. Soloukhin, and Yu A. Yakobi: Sov. J. Quant. Electron. 419 (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.L. Nighan and W.J. Wiegand: Appl. Phys. Lett. 15, 633 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O. Biblarz, J.L. Barto, and H.A. Post: Israel J. Tech. 15, 59 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.L. Barto: “Study of Gas Dynamic Effects in Non-Uniform High Pressure Electrical Discharges” Naval Postgrad. Sehl. Report NPS67-80-005 (Aug. 1980).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D.P. McErlean and P.J. Ortwerth: “Aerodynaraically Stabilized Electrical Discharges” Report AFAPL-TR-74-1 (Feb. 1974).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.P. Velikhov, V.S. Golubev, and S.V. Pashkin: Sov. Phys. Usp. 25 (5). 340 (1982).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O. Biblarz and R.E. Nelson: J. Appl. Phys. 45, 633 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Wasserstrom, Y. Crispin, J. Rom, and J. Shwartz: J. Appl. Phys. 49 (1). 81 (1978).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C.H. Davis: “Aerodynamic Stabilization of an Electrical Discharge for Gas Lasers”, MSAE/EE Thesis Naval Postgrad. Sehl. (Sept. 1980).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Biblarz
    • 1
  • J. L. Barto
    • 1
  1. 1.Naval Postgraduate SchoolMontereyUSA

Personalised recommendations