Collective Effects in Multiphoton Ionization: Application to Two-Photon One-Electron Ionization of Xenon

  • A. L’Huillier
  • G. Wendin
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 16)

Abstract

The purpose of the present work1–3 is to study various aspects of multiphoton ionization of heavy atoms4–11 which are known to show collective behaviour in single photon ionization.12–14 ultimate goal is to treat the non-linear collective and single- particle dynamics in cases where the field is strong enough to seriously perturb the atomic states (dynamic Stark shift and broadening; ponderomotive effects; harmonic generation, etc.). However, this is a rather formidable problem for a many-electron atom. Strong-field effects have essentially only been seriously considered within one- electron formulations and model calculations, and many problems remain to be solved.

Keywords

Xenon Kelly Exter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Wendin, L. Jonsson, and A. L’Huillier: Phys. Rev. Lett 56, 1241 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. L’Huillier, L. Jönsson, and G. Wendin: Phys. Rev. A 33, 3938 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. L’Huillier, and G. Wendin: submitted to J. Phys. BGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. L’Huillier, L.A. Lompré, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus: Phys. Rev. A 27, 2503 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Kruit, J. Kimman, H.G. Muller, and M. van der Wiel: Phys. Rev. A 28, 248 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Boyer, H. Egger, T.S. Luk, H. Pummer, and C.K. Rhodes: Phys. Rev. A 32, 214 ( 1984Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.K. Rhodes: Science 229, 1345 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S.L. Chin, F. Yergeau, and P. Lavigne: J. Phys. B 18, L213 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Boyer, and C.K. Rhodes: Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1490 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Szoke, and C.K. Rhodes: Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 720 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.L. Robinson: Science 232, 1193 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Wendin: In New Trends in Atomic Physics, Les Houches Summer School, Session XXXVIII, 1982, eds. G. Grynberg, and R. Stora, ( Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1984 ) p. 555Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Wendi: Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 725 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Wendi: In Giant Resonances in Atoms, Molecules and Silods, NATA Summer School, Les Houches, 16–26 June, 1986, eds. J.P. Connerade, J.-M. Esteva, and R.C. Karnatak, (Plenun) in press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.S. Pindzola, and H.P. Kelly: Phys. Rev. A11, 1543 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Moccia, N.K. Rahman, and A. Rizzo: J. Phys. B 16, 2734 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.F. Starace, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Vacuum Ultraviolet Radiation Physics, 4–8 August, 1986, Lung Sweden; to appear in Phys. Scripta (Sweden).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E.J. McGuire: Phys. Rev. A 24, 834 (1981).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Gangopadhyay, X. Tang, P. lambropoulos, and R. Shakeshaft: Phys. Rev. A, in press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    The present independent-electron approximation includes all ladder diagrams and exchange self-interaction. In this basis, the RPA buble expansion gives accurate RPAe results. The HF configuration-average one-electron result for the 2-proton 1-electron cross-section lies somewhat lower that the result of the present basis set applied to Fig. 2a and Eq. (7), and agrees quite well with McGuire18.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A.W. McCrown, M.N. Ediger, and J.G. Eden: Phys. Rev. A 26, 3318 (1982).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. L’Huillier
    • 1
  • G. Wendin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Theoretical PhysicsChalmers University of TechnologyGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations