Microwave Excitation and Ionization

  • T. F. Gallagher
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 16)


Atoms may be ionized by static fields in excess of a threshold field E ≈ l/16n4 where n is the principal quantum number [1]. On the other hand photoionization has a frequency threshold, requiring photons with energy in excess of the binding energy W. The rate of photoionization, though, is proportional to the intensity of the radiation, or E. Midway between these two processes is multiphoton ionization. Ionization by m photons requires that the photon energy be in excess of W/m, and in lowest order perturbation theory the ionization rate is proportional to Im or E2m. This scaling as Im has been observed for m = 21. For higher values of m, or even for m = 21, it is difficult to measure an Im dependence due to dynamic range considerations. Furthermore, it is not clear that the region in which the lowest order solution is valid is physically very interesting, for appreciable ionization will only occur where it is not valid. In these cases it is more useful to describe the multiphoton processes as having field or intensity thresholds. Thus multiphoton ionization qualitatively resembles field ionization.


Microwave Field Multiphoton Ionization Field Ionization Threshold Field Manifold State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    F.B. Dunning, R.F. Stebbings: In Rydberg States of Atoms and Molecules; ed. by R.F. Stebbings, F.B. Dunning ( Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983 ) p. 315Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. L’Huillier, L.A. Lompre, G. Mainfray, C. Manus: J. Phys. B 16, 1363 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.E. Bayfield, P.M. Koch: Phys. Rev. Lett.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Pillet, W.W. Smith, R. Kachru, N.H. Tran, T.F. Gallagher: Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1042 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.R. Mariani, W. van de Water, P.M. Koch: Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1261 1983ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L.A. Bloomfield, R.C. Stoneman, T.F. Gallagher: (unpublished)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    U. Eichmann, J.L. Dexter, E.Y. Xu, T.F. Gallagher: (unpublished)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Pillet, H.B. van Linden van den Heuvell, W.W. Smith, R. Kachru, N.H. Tran, T.F. Gallagher: Phys. Rev. A 30, 280 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.H. Autler, C.H. Townes: Phys., Rev. 100, 703 (1955)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.H. Shirley: Phys. Rev. 138, B979 (1965)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.E. Bayfield, L.D. Gardner, Y.Z. Gulkok, S.D. Sharma: Phys. Rev. A 24, 138 (1981) J.R. Rubbmark, M.M. Kash, M.G. Littman, D. Kleppner: Phys. Rev. A 23, 3107 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. F. Gallagher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations