From Strings to Superstrings

  • G. Veneziano
Conference paper


The first lecture will be of a historical and introductory nature Its aim will mainly to explain Table 1, a logic-flow chart of theoretical physics as It has developed — from my personal view point — during the period 1967–84.


Gauge Group Gauge Symmetry Vertex Operator Ward Identity Canonical Transformation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Footnotes

  1. 1.
    G. Veneziano: Phys. Rep. 2. 199 (1974); and references thereinADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Harari: Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 562 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. J.L. Rosner: Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 689 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    S. Fubini and G. Veneziano: Nuovo Cimento 64A, 811 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. K. Bardakci and S. Mandelstam: Phys. Rev. 184, 1640 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Fubini. D. Gordon and G. Veneziano: Phys. Lett. 29B, 679 (1969)Google Scholar
  7. 4.
    Y. Nambu: Lectures given at the Copenhagen Summer Symp. 1970 (unpublished)Google Scholar
  8. T. Goto: Progr. Theor. Phys. 46, 1660 (1971)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. C. Rebbi: Phys. Rep. 12, 1 (1974): and references thereinMathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 5.
    W. Thirring: these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  11. 6.
    J. Scherk: Nucl. Phys. B31. 222 (1971)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 7.
    A. Neveau and J. Scherk: Nucl. Phys. B36, 155 (1955)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. J.L. Gervais and A. Neveu: Nucl. Phys. B46, 381 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 8.
    J. Scherk and J.H. Schwarz: Nucl. Phys. B81, 118 (1974)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 9.
    T. Yoneya: Nuovo Cimento 8, 951 (1973)Google Scholar
  16. 10.
    F. Gllozzi. J. Scherk and D.I. Olive: Phys. Lett. 65B, 282 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nucl. Phys. B122. 253 (1977)Google Scholar
  18. 11.
    M. Green and J. Schwarz: Phys. Lett. 149B, 117 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 12.
    A.M. Polyakov: Phys. Lett. 103B, 207 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 13.
    J. Lepowsky et al.(eds.): Vertex Operators in Mathematics and Physics (Springer Verlag, 1984)Google Scholar
  21. 14.
    K.S. Fradkin and V.I. Vllkovlsky: Phys. Lett. 73B, 209 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. I.A. Batalin and E.S Fradkin: Phys. Lett. 122B. 157 (1983)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. M. Henneaux: Phys. Rep. 126, 1 (1985): and references thereinMathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 15.
    S. Hwang: Phys. Rev. D28, 2614 (1983)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 16.
    V. Kato and K. Ogava: Nucl. Phys. B212. 443 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 17.
    L. Brink. P. DI Vecchia and P.S. Howe: Phys. Lett. 65B. 417 (1976)Google Scholar
  27. S. Deser and B. Zumino: Phys. Lett. 65B. 369 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 18.
    S. Fubini and G. Veneziano: Ann. Phys. 63, 12 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 19.
    M.A. Vlrasoro: Phys. Rev. D1, 2933 (1970)ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 20.
    G. Veneziano: Phys. Lett. 167B, 388 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. J. Maharana and G. Veneziano: Phys. Lett. 169B, 177 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 21.
    J. Maharana and G. Veneziano: CERN preprint TH-4455 (1986)Google Scholar
  33. 22.
    E.S. Fradkin and A. Tseytlin: Phys. Lett. 158B. 316 (1985); and 160B, 64 (1985)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. C. Lovelace: Phys. Lett. 135B, 75 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. C. Callan. E. Martinec. M. Perry and D. Friedan: Nucl. Phys. B262, 593 (1985)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 23.
    E.S. Abers and B.W. Lee: Phys. Rep. 9, 1 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 24.
    See. for example S. Weinberg: Phys. Lett. 156B, 309 (1985)Google Scholar
  38. 25.
    J.L. Gervais and A. Jevicki. Nucl. Phys. B110, 93 (1976)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 26.
    D J. Gross. J.A. Harvey. E Martinec and R. Rohm: Nucl. Phys. B256, 253 (1985)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 27.
    P. Goddard. D. Olive and A. Schwimmer: Imperial College preprint TP84-85/23 (1985)Google Scholar
  41. 28.
    G. Veneziano: CERN preprint TH 4397 (1986)Google Scholar
  42. 29.
    L. Alvarez-Gaumé and E. Witten; Nucl. Phys. B234. 269 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 30.
    P.G.O. Freund: Phys. Lett. 151B, 387 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. A. Casher, F Englert, H. Nicolai and A. Taormina: CERN preprint TH-4220 (1985)Google Scholar
  45. 31.
    K.S. Naraln: Phys. Lett. 169B, 41 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. L. Castellaril: Turin preprint 1FTT85/13 (1985)Google Scholar
  47. 32.
    D.Z Friedman. G.W. Gibbs and P.C. West: Phys. Lett. 124B, 491 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 33.
    P. Candelas, C T. Horowitz. A. Strominger and E. Witten: Nucl. Phys. B258, 46 (1985)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 34.
    B. Kolb. D. Seckel and M. Turner: Nature 314, 415 (1985); and references thereinADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 35.
    M. Dine. R Rohm. N. Seiberg and E. Witten: Phys. Lett. 156B, 55 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 36.
    G. Segre: these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  52. 37.
    M.T. Grisaru. A.E.M. van de Ven and D. Zanon: Harvard preprint HUTP-86/A027 (1986)Google Scholar
  53. M D. Freeman and C.N Pope: Imperial College preprint TP85-86/117 (1986)Google Scholar
  54. 38.
    M. Dine and N. Seiberg: Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 366 (1985)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 39.
    V. Kaplunovsky: Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1033 (1985)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 40.
    E. Witten: Phys. Lett. 149B, 351 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 41.
    The u’s. g’s and f’s (for I. K = …...,4) are just the weights of the 8v. 8s. and 8c representations of SO(8) and are related by the triality property of this unique group (see also Section 3.1).Google Scholar
  58. 42.
    We strongly feel that this is the way we should look at SST phenomenology today. We are too far from being able to extract any detailed predictions to lest a theory. We may be able, however, to reject possibilités (all of them?) on the basis of their gross features.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Veneziano
    • 1
  1. 1.CERNGenèveSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations