Advertisement

Langzeitsedierung und Schmerzbehandlung von Intensivpatienten

  • R. Dennhardt
  • H.-J. Gramm
Conference paper

Zusammenfassung

Die psychovegetativen Funktionen des Patienten werden durch Grund- und Begleiterkrankungen, aber auch durch die Funktionsabläufe auf einer Intensivstation beeinflußt. In der Situation einer vitalen Bedrohung sollen daher Sedierung und Analgesierung bei möglichst flacher Hypnose zur Indifferenz des Patienten führen. Er soll kooperativ und aktivierbar bleiben, die Mißlichkeiten unabwendbarer, intensiv-therapeutischer Maßnahmen aber tolerieren und auf keinen Fall unter ihnen leiden.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Adam K, Oswald I (1977) Sleep is for tissue restoration. JR Coll Physicians Lond 11:376 Antoniadis A, Müller WE, Wollert UJ (1980) Benzodiazepine receptor interactions may be involved in the neurotoxicity of various penicillin derivates. Ann Neurol 8: 71–73Google Scholar
  2. Broughton R, Baron R (1978) Sleep patterns in the intensive care unit and on the ward after acute myocardial infarction. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45: 348–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dobb GJ, Murphy D (1985) Sedation and analgesia during intensive care. Clin Anaesthesiol 3: 1055Google Scholar
  4. Dubin WR, Field HL, Gastfriend DR (1979) Post-cardiotomy delirium: a critical review. J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 77: 586Google Scholar
  5. Dundee JW, Collier PS, Carlisle RJT, Harper KW (1986) Prolonged midazolam elimination half-life. Br J Clin Pharmacol 21: 425–429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Greenblatt DJ, Allen MD, Locniskar A, Harmatz JS, Shader RI (1979) Lorazepam kinetics in the elderly. Clin Pharmacol Ther 26: 103–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hale M, Koss N, Kerstein M, Camp K, Barash P (1977) Psychiatric complications in a surgical ICU. Crit Care Med 5: 199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hug CC Jr (1984) Pharmacokinetics and dynamics of narcotic analgesics. In: Prys-Roberts C, Hug CC Jr (eds) Pharmacokinetics of anaesthesia. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 187–234Google Scholar
  9. Jones J, Hoggart B, Withey J, Donaghue K, Ellis BW (1979) What the patient say: a study of reactions to an intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 5: 89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mantegazza P, Parenti M, Tammiso R, Vita P, Zambotti F, Zonta N (1982) Modification of the antinociceptive effect of morphine by centrally administered diazepam and midazolam. Br J Pharmacol 75: 569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mather LE (1983) Clinical pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and its newer derivates. Clin Pharmacokin 8: 422–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McDonald CF, Thomson SA, Scott NC, Scott W, Grant IWB, Crompton GK (1986) Benzodiazepine-opiate antagonism - a problem in intensive-care therapy. Intensive Care Med 12: 39–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moldenhauer CC, Hug CC Jr (1984) Use of narcotic analgesics as anaesthetics. Clin Anesth 2: 107–138Google Scholar
  14. Orr WC, Stahl ML (1977) Sleep disturbances after open heart surgery. Am J Cardiol 39: 196–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shannon HE, Holtzman SG, Davis DC (1976) Interactions between narcotics analgesics and benzodiazepine derivatives on behavior in the mouse. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 199: 389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shapiro HM (1985) Barbiturates in brain ischaemia. Br J Anaesth 57: 82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Dennhardt
    • 1
  • H.-J. Gramm
    • 1
  1. 1.Klinik für AnaesthesiologieKrankenhaus NordwestFrankfurt 90Germany

Personalised recommendations