Nucleon Form Factors from Elastic Scattering of Polarized Leptons (e,μ,τ) from Polarized Nucleons

  • R. Tegen

Abstract

Recently nucleon form factors have regained much interest, both theoretical and experimental. Future electron scattering facilities (BATES, CEBAF) will devote considerable efforts to the study of the neutron charge form factor G E n (q 2 ). In all these experiments, however, the lepton beam is an electron beam. At the “meson factories” (SIN, LAMPF, TRIUMF) the pion beams produce a longitudinally polarized muon (μ) beam (through spin rotation techniques a transverse polarization of the muon beam can be achieved) which can favourably be used to remove persistent uncertainties in our knowledge of the nucleon form factors: i) the size of the proton (measured by the slope of the charge form factor G E p (q 2) near zero) is 0.86±0.01 fm, known only with a rather large uncertainty [1,2]; the corresponding neutron charge form factor G E n (q 2 ) is badly known away from the rather precise thermal neutron on atomic electrons scattering data (at very low 4-momentum transfer squared (-q 2 ) [3]); ii) the magnetic form factors G M p,n (q 2) are badly known for very low (-q 2 ) (due to a kinematical suppression ~q 4 in the cross section, for a massless lepton beam) where the charge form factor G E p (q 2 ) dominates (at high (-q2), G M p (q 2 ) dominates by far the cross section).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. Borkowski et al.: Z. Phys. A275, 29 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 1a.
    F. Borkowski et al.:Nucl Phys. B93, 461 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    G. Höhler: In LandoltBörnstein, New Series, Vol. 9 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1982) pt.b2, ch 2.5Google Scholar
  4. 2a.
    M. Gourdin: Phys. Rep. 11C, 29 (1974)Google Scholar
  5. 2b.
    M.N. Rosenbluth: Phys. Rev. 79, 615 (1950)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 3.
    V.E. Krohn et al.: Phys. Rev. D8, 1305 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 3a.
    L. Koester et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1021 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 4.
    S.J. Brodsky, G.P. Lepage: Phys. Scripta 23, 945 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 4a.
    G.P. Lepage, S.J. Brodsky: Phys. Rev. D22, 2157 (1980)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. For a review seeGoogle Scholar
  11. 4b.
    S.J. Brodsky: Springer Tracts in Modem Physics 100, 81 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 5.
    R. Tegen, R. Brockmann, W. Weise: Z. Phys. A307, 339 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 5a.
    E. Oset, R. Tegen, W. Weise: Nucl. Phys. A426, 456 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 5b.
    S. Théberge, G.A. Miller, A.W. Thomas: Can. J. Phys. 60, 59 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 5c.
    S. Théberge, A.W. Thomas: Nucl. Phys. A393, 252 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 6.
    B.M. Preedom, R. Tegen: Preprint Univ. South Carolina (1986)Google Scholar
  17. 7.
    R.H. Cahn, F.J. Gilman: Phys. Rev. D17, 1313 (1978)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 7a.
    V.W. Hughes: AIP Conf. Proc. 51, 171 (1978)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 8.
    N. Dombey: Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, 236 (1969); M. Gourdin: Ref. [2]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 9.
    M.J. Alguard et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1258 (1976) See also Hughes: Ref. [7]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 10.
    R. Tegen, W. Weise: Z. Phys. A314, 357 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 11.
    A. del Guerra et al.: Nucl. Phys. B107, 65 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 11a.
    E. Amaldi, S. Fubini, G. Furlan: Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol. 83 (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Tegen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Theoretical Physics and AstrophysicsUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschRepublic of South Africa

Personalised recommendations