Advertisement

Plant Architecture and Resource Competition

  • M. M. Caldwell
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 61)

Abstract

The character of an ecosystem is determined in part by the balance of competition among higher plant species. In most habitats, the physical environment is conducive to the growth and survival of more species than actually persist and compete at a particular site. Competition is, thus, often a sorting proeess that determines which plant species occupy a site. The higher plant species composition in turn has a large bearing on species membership in other trophic levels. Although the importance of competition among higher plants is well appreciated and the subject of much study, relatively little progress has been made toward an understanding of how plants compete with one another for resources, and which traits are of particular advantage in this comptition.

Keywords

White Clover Resource Competition Plant Architecture Phosphate Uptake Light Interception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antos JA, Zobel DB (1984) Ecological implications of belowground morphology of nine coniferous forest herbs. Bot Gaz 145: 508–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin JP (1976) Compétition for plant nutrients in soil; a theoretical approach. J Agric Sci 87: 341 - 356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin JP, Tinker PB, Nye PH (1972) Uptake of solutés by multiple root systems from soil. II. The theoretical effects of rooting density and pattern on uptake of nutrients from soil. Plant Soil 36: 693–708Google Scholar
  4. Bell AD, Tomlinson PB (1980) Adaptive architecture in rhizomatous plants. Bot J Linn Soc 80: 125–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benjamin LR (1984) Rôle of foliage habit in the compétition between differently sized plants in carrot crops. Ann Bot (London) 53: 549–557Google Scholar
  6. Berendse F (1979) Competition between plant populations with différent rooting depths I. Theoretical considerations. Oecologia (Berlin) 43: 19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berendse F (1981) Competition between plant populations with différent rooting depths II. Pot experiments. Oecologia (Berlin) 48:334–341 Berendse F (1982) Compétition between plant populations with different rooting depths III. Field experiments. Oecologia (Berlin) 53: 50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boller BC, Nösberger J (1985) Photosynthesis of white clover leaves as influenced by canopy position, leaf age, and temperature. Ann Bot (London) 56: 19–27Google Scholar
  9. Bookman PA, Mack RN (1982) Root interaction between Bromus tectorum and Poa pratensis: a three-dimensional analysis. Ecology 62: 640–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caldwell MM (1986) Root system compétition in natural communities. In: Gregory PJ (ed) Root development and function. Effects of the physical environment. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Caldwell MM, Richards JH (1986) Competing root systems: Morphology and models of root absorption. In: Givnish T (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 251–273Google Scholar
  12. Connell JH (1975) Producing structure in natural communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap, Cambridge, Mass, pp 460–490Google Scholar
  13. Cook SJ, Ratcliff D (1985) Effect of fertilizer, root and shoot competition on the growth of siratro (Macroptilium atropurpureum) and green panic (Panicum maximum var. trichoglume) seedings in a native speargrass (Heteropogon contortus) sward. Aust J Agric Res 36: 233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coutts MP (1983) Root architecture and tree stability. Plant Soil 71: 171–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donald CM (1963) Competition among crop and pasture plants. Adv Agron 15: 1–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eagles CF (1983) Relationship between compétitive ability and yielding ability in mixtures and monocultures of populations of Dactylis glomerata L. Grass Forage Sci 38: 21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehleringer J, Forseth I (1980) Solar tracking by plants. Science 210: 1094–1098PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitter AH (1982) Morphometric analysis of root systems: application of the technique and influence of soil fertility on root system development in two herbaceous species. Plant Cell Environ 5: 313–322Google Scholar
  19. Ford ED, Diggle PJ (1981) Compétition for light in a plant monoculture modelled as a spatial stochastic proeess. Ann Bot (London) 48: 481–500Google Scholar
  20. Fusseder A (1985) Verteilung des Wurzelsystems von Mais im Hinblick auf die Konkurrenz um Makronàhrstoffe. Z Pflanzenernaehr Bodenkd 148: 321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gates DM (1980) Biophysical ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 611 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodman PJ, Collison M (1982) Varietal differences in uptake of 32 P labelled phosphate in clover plus ryegrass swards and monocuitures. Ann Appl Biol 100: 559–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grime JP (1979) Plant stratégies and végétation processes. Wiley, New York, 222 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Hallé F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB (1978) Tropical trees and forests: An architectural analysis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 441 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Harper JL, Clatworthy JN (1963) The compétitive biology of closely related species VI. Analysis of the growth of Trifolium repens and T. fragiferum in pure and mixed populations. J Exp Bot 14: 172–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmes MG (1983) Perception of shade. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B 303: 503–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holmes MG, Smith H (1977) The function of phytochrome in the natural environment - II. The influence of végétation canopies on the spectral energy distribution of natural daylight. Photochem Photobiol 25: 539–545Google Scholar
  28. Honda H, Fisher JB (1978) Tree branch angle: Maximizing effective leaf area. Science 199: 888–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Honda H, Tomlinson PB, Fisher JB (1981) Computer simulation of branch interaction and regulation by unequal flow rates in botanical trees. Am J Bot 68: 569–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Horn (1971) The adaptive geometry of trees. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, 144 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Jennings PR, Jesus J de (1968) Studies on competition in rice. 1. Competition in mixtures of varieties. Evolution 22: 119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kummerow J, Krause D, Jow W (1977) Root systems of chaparral shrubs. Oecologia (Berlin) 29: 163–177Google Scholar
  33. Küppers M (1982) Kohlenstoffhaushalt, Wasserhaushalt, Wachstum und Wuchsform von Holzgewächsen im Konkurrenzgefüge eines Heckenstandortes. Thesis, BayreuthGoogle Scholar
  34. Küppers M (1984a) Carbon relations and competition between woody species in a Central European hedgerow. I. Photosynthetic characteristics. Oecologia (Berlin) 64: 332–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Küppers M (1984b) Carbon relations and compétition between woody species in a Central European hedgerow. II. Stomatal responses, water use, and hydraulic conductivity in the root/leaf pathway. Oecologia (Berlin) 64: 344–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Küppers M (1984c) Carbon relations and competition between woody species in a Central European hedgerow. III. Carbon and water balance on the leaf level. Oecologia (Berlin) 65: 94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Küppers M (1985) Carbon relations and compétition between woody species in a Central European hedgerow. IV. Growth form and partitioning. Oecologia (Berlin) 66: 343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kutschera L, Lichtenegger E (1982) Wurzelatlas mitteleuropäischer Grünlandpflanzen. B. I. Monocotyledoneae. Fischer, Stuttgart, 516 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Maillette L (1982) Structural dynamics of silver birch I. The fates of buds. J Appl Ecol 19: 203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin MPLD, Field RJ (1984) The nature of compétition between perennial ryegrass and white clover. Grass Forage Sci 39: 247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McMahon TA, Kronauer RE (1976) Tree structures: Deducing the principle of mechanical design. J Theor Biol 59: 443–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Monsi M, Saeki T (1953) Ober den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion. Jpn J Bot 14: 22–52Google Scholar
  43. Morgan DC, Smith H (1976) Linear relationship between phytochrome photoequilibrium and growth in plants under simulated natural radiation. Nature (London) 262: 210–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morgan DC, Rook DA, Warrington IJ, Turnbull HL (1983) Growth and development of Pinus radiata D. Don: the effect of light quality. Plant, Cell Environ 6: 691–701Google Scholar
  45. Parrish JAD, Bazzaz FA (1976) Underground niche separation in successional plants. Ecology 57: 1281–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pielou EC (1962) The use of plant-to-neighbor distances for détection of competition. J Ecol 50: 357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Putz FE, Coley PD, Lu K, Montalvo A, Aiello A (1983) Uprooting and snapping of trees: structural determinants and ecological consequences. Can J For Res 13: 1011–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Putz FE, Parker GG, Archibald RM (1984) Mechanical abrasion and intercrown spacing. Am Midi Nat 112: 24–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Remphrey WR, Powell GR (1984) Crown architecture of Larix laricina saplings: shoot preformation and neoformation and their relationships to shoot vigour. Can J Bot 62: 2181–2192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rhodes I, Stern WR (1978) The physiological basis for variation in the yield of grass/clover mixtures. In: Wright CE (ed) Plant physiology and herbage production. Br Grassl Soc, Hurley, pp 175–189Google Scholar
  51. Rimmington GM (1984) A model of the effect of interspecies competition for light on dry-matter production. Aust J Plant Physiol 11: 277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saeki T (1963) Light relations in plant communities. In: Evans LT (ed) Environmental control of plant growth. Academic Press, London New York, pp 79–94Google Scholar
  53. Sakai KI, Gotoh K (1955) Studies on competition in plants. IV. Competitive ability of F1 hybrids in barley. J Hered 46: 139–143Google Scholar
  54. Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific compétition. Am Nat 122: 240–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira T (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant form–The pipe model theory. I. Basic analyses. Jpn J Ecol 14: 97–105Google Scholar
  56. Steffens D (1984) Wurzelstudien und Phosphat-Aufnahme von Weidegras und Rotklee unter Feldbedingungen. Z Pflanzenernaehr Bodenkd 147: 85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Talling JF (1970) Generalized and specialized features of phytoplankton as a form of photosynthetic cover. In: Prediction and measurement of photosynthetic productivity. Cent Agric Publ, Wageningen, pp 431–445Google Scholar
  58. Waring RH, Schroeder PE, Oren R (1982) Application of the pipe model theory to predict canopy leaf area. J For Res 12: 556–560Google Scholar
  59. Watson MA, Casper BB (1984) Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15: 233–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wierman CA, Oliver CD (1979) Crown stratification by species in even-aged mixed stands of Douglas-fîr — western hemlock. Can J For Res 9: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams WA (1963) Competition for light between annual species of Trifolium during the vegetative phase. Ecology 44: 475–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yeaton RI, Travis J, Gilinsky E (1977) Competition and spacing in plant communities: the Arizona upland association. J Ecol 65: 587–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. M. Caldwell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations