Advertisement

Urodynamische Untersuchungen

  • Paul Abrams
  • Roger Feneley
  • Michael Torrens

Zusammenfassung

Die urodynamische Untersuchung ist immer dann indiziert, wenn das Untersuchungs-ergebnis die Behandlung des Patienten verbessern kann. In Kapitel 2 wurde gezeigt, daß identische Symptome des unteren Harntraktes durch eine Vielzahl pathophysiologischer Prozesse verursacht werden können. Das zeigt, wie hoch die Irrtumsrate ist, wenn man sich nur auf die Symptome alleine verläßt. Ähnlich verhält es sich auch mit der Endoskopie und der Ausscheidungsurographie im Rahmen der Diagnostik von Blasenentleerungsstörungen, wie bereits diskutiert wurde.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Abrams PH, Skidmore R, Poole AC, Follett D (1977) The concept and measurement of bladder work. Br J Urol 49: 133–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrams PH, Shah PJR, Feneley RCL (1981) A new simple urodynamic apparatus. In: Zinner N (ed) Female incontinence. Liss, New York, p 297–300Google Scholar
  3. Andersen JT, Bradley WE, Timm GW(1976) Electrophysiological techniques for the study of urethral and vesical innervation. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10: 189–194Google Scholar
  4. Arbuckle LD, Paquin AJ (1963) Urinary outflow tract resistance in normal human females. Invest Urol 1: 216–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Asmussen M, Ulmsten U (1975) Simultaneous urethrocystometry and urethral pressure profile measurement with a new technique. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 54: 385–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asmussen M, Ulmsten U (1976) Simultaneous urethrocystometry with a new technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10: 7–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Awad SA, Bryniak SR, Lowe PJ, Bruce AW, Twiddy DAS (1978) Urethral pressure profile in female stress incontinence. J Urol 120: 475–479PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Backman KA (1965) Urinary flow during micturition in normal women. Acta Chir Scand 130:357–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Backman KA, von Garrelts B, Sundblad R (1966) Micturition in normal women. Studies of pressure and flow. Acta Chir Scand 132: 403–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown M, Wickham JEA (1969)The urethral pressure profile. Br J Urol 41: 211–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bryndorf J, Sandøe E (1960)The hydrodynamics of micturition. Dan Med Bull 7: 65–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards LE (1973) Investigation and management of incontinence in women. Ann Roy Coll Surg 52: 69–85Google Scholar
  13. Edwards LE, Singh M, Notley R, Whitaker R (1972) Continence after scrotal flap urethroplasty. Br J Urol 44: 23–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Enhörning G (1961) Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intraurethral pressure. Acta Chir Scand [Suppl] 276Google Scholar
  15. Enhörning G, Miller ER, Hinman F(1964) Urethral closure studied with cine-roentgenography and simultaneous bladder-urethra pressure recording. Surg Gynecol Obstet 118: 507–516Google Scholar
  16. Frimodt-Møller C, Hald T(1972) Clinical urodynamics. Scand J Urol Nephrol [Suppl 15] 143–155Google Scholar
  17. Garrelts B von (1956) Analysis of micturition. A new method of recording the voiding of the bladder. Acta Chir Scand 112: 326–340Google Scholar
  18. Garrelts B von (1958) Micturition in the normal male. Acta Chir Scand 114: 197–210Google Scholar
  19. George NJR, Feneley RCL (1978) The importance of postural influences on urethral musculature. Proc Int Cont Soc (Manchester) 8: 117–118Google Scholar
  20. Gerstenberg T, Hald T, Meyhoff HH (1980) Urinary cerebral evoked potentials mediated through urethral sensory nerves - a preliminary report. Proc Int Cont Soc (Los Angeles) 10: 181Google Scholar
  21. Gierup J (1970) Micturition studies in infants and children. Scand J Urol Nephrol 4: 217–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gleason DM, Bottaccini MR, Perling D and Lattimer JK (1967) A challenge to current urodynamic thought. J Urol 97: 935PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Glahn BE (1970) Neurogenic bladder diagnosed pharmacologically on the basis of denervation supersensitivity. Scand J Urol Nephrol 4: 13–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gosling J (1979) The structure of the bladder and urethra in relation to function. Urol Clin North Am 6: 31–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Griffiths DJ (1980) Urodynamics, the mechanics and hydrodynamics of the lower urinary tract. Adam Hilger, Bristol, p 121Google Scholar
  26. Klevmark B (1974) Motility of the urinary bladder in cats during filling at physiological rates. 1. Intravesical pressure patterns studied by a new method of cystometry. Acta Physiol Scand 90: 565–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lapides J, Friend CR, Ajemian EP, Reus WS (1962) Denervation supersensitivity as a test for neurogenic bladder. Surg Gynecol Obstet 114: 241Google Scholar
  28. Merrill DC (1971) The air cystometer, a new instrument for evaluating bladder function. J Urol 106: 865–866PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Meyhoff HH, Griffiths DJ, Nordling J, Hald T(1977) Clinical applications of momentum flux measurements with special reference to detrusor hyperreflexia and meatal stenosis. Urol Res 8: 71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Plevnik S, Janez J (1978) Urethral pressure profile and urethral pressure-time variations. Proc Int Cont Soc (Manchester) 8: 235–238Google Scholar
  31. Ritter RC, Sterling AM, Zinner NR (1977) Physical information in the external urinary stream of the normal and obstructed adult male. Br J Urol 49: 293–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Siroky MB, Olsson CA, Krane RJ (1979)The flow rate nomogram. 1. Development. J Urol 122: 665–668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith JC (1968) Urethral resistance to micturition. Br J Urol 40: 125–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sundin T, Dahlstrom A, Norden L, Svedmyr N (1977)The sympathetic innervation and adrenoceptor function of the human lower urinary tract in the normal state and after parasympathetic denervation. Invest Urol 14: 322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tanagho EA (1979) Urodynamics of female urinary incontinence with emphasis on stress incontinence. J Urol 122: 200–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas DG (1979) Clinical urodynamics in neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am 6: 237–253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Torrens MJ (1977) A comparative evaluation of carbon dioxide and water cystometry and sphincterometry. Proc Int Cont Soc (Portoroz) 7: 103–104Google Scholar
  38. Vereecken RL, Verduyn H (1970)The electrical activity of the paraurethral and perineal muscles in normal and pathological conditions. Br J Urol 42: 457–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wein AJ, Hanno PM, Dixon DO, Raezer D, Benson GS (1978). The reproducibility and interpretation of carbon dioxide cystometry. J Urol 120: 205–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Whiteside CG, Bates P (1979) Synchronous video pressure-flow cystourethrography. Urol Clin North Am 6: 93–102PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Abrams
    • 1
  • Roger Feneley
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Michael Torrens
    • 5
  1. 1.Southmead HospitalBristolEngland
  2. 2.Southmead Green HospitalEngland
  3. 3.Ham Green HospitalEngland
  4. 4.The Clinical Investigation UnitHam Green HospitalPill, BristolEngland
  5. 5.Department of NeurosurgeryFrenchay HospitalBristolEngland

Personalised recommendations