Advertisement

Selected Bivalves for Monitoring of Heavy Metal Contamination in the Colombian Caribbean

  • N. H. Campos

Abstract

Coastal regions receive contaminants from industries and urban centers or via river inputs from the drainage basin, thus coastal ecosystems and their biota are most likely to be affected. The degree of pollution in these systems can be determined by water and/or sediment analysis or by measuring pollution levels in biota; each approach has advantages and shortcomings. The determination of accumulated pollutants in biota offers, apart from low detection levels, interpretations on the bioavailability of contaminant loads. In order to serve as a biological monitor a selected organism should have a high concentration factor, a wide physiological tolerance, be of commercial importance, abundant and of wide distribution in the sampled area (Reish 1976).

Keywords

Heavy Metal Contamination Mytilus Edulis Contaminant Load Tissue Metal Concentration High Concentration Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Butler PA, Andren G, Bonde J, Jernetör A, Reish DJ (1977) Monitoring organisms. FAO Fish Rep 99: 101–112Google Scholar
  2. Camacho G (1977) Concentración de mercurio total en dos organismos bentónicos de la Bahía de Cartagena. Tesis, Univ. Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Colombia, p 29Google Scholar
  3. Campos NH (1984) Zur Belastung einiger Muschelarten von der karibischen Küste Kolumbiens mit Schwermetallen. Doctor Thesis, Christian - Albrecht Univ., Federal Republic of Germany, p 116Google Scholar
  4. Campos NH (to published) Determinación de metales pesados enIsognomon bicolor de la región de Santa Marta. Anal Inst Inv Mar Punta de BetínGoogle Scholar
  5. Escobar J, Granados J, Podlensky E, Valle V (1977) Estudio de la contaminación con mercurio en la Bahía de Cartagena ( Colombia ). Invest, p 39Google Scholar
  6. Goldberg ED, Koide M, Hodge V, Flegal RA, Martin J (1983) U.S. mussel watch 1977–1978. Results on trace metals and radionuclides. Estuar coast Shelf Sci 16: 69–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haug A, Melsom S, Omang S (1974) Estimation of heavy metal pollution in two Norwegian fjord areas by analysis of the brown alga Ascophyllum nodosum. Environ Pollut 7: 179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ICES (1977a) The ICES coordinated monitoring programme in the North Sea, 1974. ICES coop Res Rept 58Google Scholar
  9. ICES (1977b) The ICES coordinated monitoring programme, 1975–1976. ICES coop Res Rept 72Google Scholar
  10. Leal E (1982) Contribución a la ecología y biología del chipi-chipi (Gen: Donax, Bivalvia, Donacidae) en la región caribeña, Bahía Gaira-Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta. Tesis, Univ. Antioquia, Colombia, p 82Google Scholar
  11. Pagliardini JL, Gómez MA, Gutierres H, Zapata SI, Jurado A, GarayJA, Vernette G (1982) Síntesis del proyecto Bahía de Cartagena. Bol Cient CIOH 4: 49–110Google Scholar
  12. Phillips DJH (1976) The common mussel Mytilus edulis as an indicator of pollution by zinc, cadmium, lead and copper. I. Effects of environmental variables on uptake of metals. Mar Biol 38: 59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Phillips DJH (1977) The use of biological indicator organisms to monitor trace metal pollution in marine and estuarine environments: A Review. Environ Pollut 13: 218–317Google Scholar
  14. Phillips DJH (1980) Quantitative aquatic biological indicators. Applied Science Publishers, London, p 487Google Scholar
  15. Reish DJ (1976) Pilot study on monitoring bioaccumulation in marine organisms. In: Portmann JE (ed) Manual of methods in aquatic environment research. Part 2. Guidelines for the use of biological accumulators in marine pollution monitoring. FAO Fish Tech Pap 150: 64–68Google Scholar
  16. Siung AM (1980) Studies on the biology of Isognomon alatus Gmelin (Bivalvia; Isognomonidae) with notes on its potential as a commercial species. Bull mar Sci 30: 90–101Google Scholar
  17. Theede H, Anderson I, Lehnberg W (1979) Cadmium in Mytilus edulis from German coastal waters. Kieler Meeresforsch 27: 147–155Google Scholar
  18. Wedler E (1983) El cultivo de la ostra del Caribe Crassostrea rhizophorae Guilding, Ing Pesq Manual Tec 1, p 76Google Scholar
  19. Wedler E, Pérez L, Palacio J (1978) Ostricultura en la Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta: Primeira etapa. Inf Inst Inv Mar Punta de Betín, p 59Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. H. Campos
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad Nacional de ColombiaSanta MartaColombia

Personalised recommendations