Advertisement

Polarity of the Proximal Tubular Cell: Comparison of Luminal and Contraluminal Transport Systems for Hexoses, Dicarboxylates, and Sulfate

  • K. J. Ullrich

Abstract

Until 1970 almost nothing was known about the individual steps of transepithelial transport. Epithelia have therefore to be considered as “black box.” In studies of the proximal tubule it was first realized that solutes move either paracellularly and then passively or transcellularly and then usually actively [18]. By analyzing the latter, Na+-coupled transport was detected, which functions as follows (Fig. 1): Na+ ions are pumped out of the cell into the interstitial space by (Na+ + K+)-ATPase, which is localized at the basolateral cell side. In this process, the intracellular Na+ concentra­tion falls far below that of the lumen or interstitium and Na+ ions tend to run back into the cell. In the cell membrane, especially at the luminal side, there do exist transport systems in which Na+ ions can flow, but only in cotransport with other solutes, i.e., hexoses, amino acids, phosphate, monocarboxylates, sulfate, bile acids, or dicarboxy­lates. The transport systems for each have been well characterized by transport studies in situ, by experiments with membrane vesicles, and by electrophysiological measurements [19]. The transport systems on the contraluminal cell side, by contrast, are less well investigated. There are several reasons for this. Electrophysiological techniques cannot be applied, because of electroneutral coupling. Futhermore, it is more difficult to obtain defined membrane vesicles of this cell side. An in situ method is therefore very welcome, and one such was recently devised by our group [20]. Together with vesicle studies, it allows a good characterization of contraluminal transport mechanisms. In the following I will present data on luminal and contralumi­nal transport of:
  1. 1.

    Glucose and other hexoses

     
  2. 2.

    Dicarboxylates, including all intermediates of the Krebs cycle

     
  3. 3.

    Sulfate and related compounds, including oxalate.

     

Keywords

Proximal Tubule Proximal Tubular Cell Cell Side Dicarboxylate Transport Oxygen Oxygen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ullrich KJ, Frömter E, Hinton T, Rumrich G, Kleinzeller A (1976) In: Schmidt U, Dubach UC (eds) Renal metabolism in relation to renal function. Huber, Bern, pp 256–260Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turner RJ, Silverman M (1978) Biochim Biophys. Acta 507: 305–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ullrich KJ, Papavassiliou F (1985) Pflugers Arch. 404: 150–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kinne R, Murer H (1978) In: Lemieux G (ed) Proceedings of the 7th international congress in nephrology, Karger, Basel, pp 601–608Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silverman M, Turner RJ (1982) Am J Physiol 242: F711–F720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wright SH, Kippen I, Klinenberg JR, Wright EM (1980) J Membr Bio. 157: 73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wright SH, Krasne S, Kippen I, Wright EM (1981) Biochim Biophys Acta 640: 767–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Samarzija I, Molnar V, Frömter E (1981) In: Takacs L (ed) Kidney and body fluids, vol 11. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 419–423Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sheridan E, Rumrich G, Ullrich KJ (1984) Pflugers Arch 399: 18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burckhardt G (1984) Pflugers Arch. 401: 254–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ullrich KJ, Rumrich G, Klöss S (1984) Pflugers Arch 400: 241–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ullrich KJ, Rumrich G, Klöss S (1980) Pflugers Arch 383: 159–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ullrich KJ, Rumrich G, Klöss S (1980) Pflugers Arch 387: 127–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pritchard JB, Renfro JL (1983) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 2603–2607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Löw I, Friedrich T, Burckhardt G (1984) Am J Physiol 246: F334–F342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lücke H, Stange G, Murer H (1979) Biochem J 182: 223–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ullrich KJ, Rumrich G, Klöss S (1985) Pflugers Archiv: 404: 293–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frömter E, Rumrich G, Ullrich KJ (1973) Pflugers Arch 343: 189–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ullrich KJ, Frömter E, Murer H (1979) Klin Wochenschr 57: 977–991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fritzsch G, Haase W, Rumrich G, Fasold H (1984) Pflugers Arch 400: 250–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kahlenberg A, Dolansky U (1972) Can J Biochem 50: 638–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fukuhara Y, Turner RJ (1984) Biochim Biophys Acta 770: 73–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. J. Ullrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für BiophysikFrankfurt/Main 70Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations