Skip to main content

Some Aspects of Robertsonian Karyotype Variation in European Wild Mice

  • Conference paper
The Wild Mouse in Immunology

Part of the book series: Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology ((CT MICROBIOLOGY,volume 127))

Abstract

Karyotypically the genus Mus is highly conservative and the most prevalent karyotype consists of 40 acrocentric chromosomes with pericentromeric heterochromatin. In addition, many species of the genus Mus exhibit a homosequential G-band pattern along their chromosomes (Hsu et al. 1978). The 40 all acrocentric karyotype can be considered as the standard karyotype of the house mouse Mus musculus within their world-wide distribution area. In Western Europe, however, several populations with varying chromosome numbers from 2n=39 to 2n=22 are found. The reduction in chromosome number is always associated with a gain of biarmed (metacentric) chromosomes that are equivalent to two acrocentric autosomes. This type of structural rearrangement — the translocation of two acrocentric autosomes on top of each other — is well known as Robertsonian (Rb) translocation, fusion, or exchange. It is generally assumed that prior to whole arm exchange, breaks are simultaneously occurring in both partners. By an analysis of C-banded Rb chromosomes the position of the breakpoints can be ascertained more precisely. Since on both sides of the primary constriction of the rearranged chromosome similar sized blocks of constitutive heterochromatin are present, the breaks must have occurred very close to the centromeric tip of the ancestral acrocentric autosomes (Fig. 1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adolph S, Klein J (1981) Robertsonian variation in Mus musculus from Central Europe, Spain, and Scotland. J Hered 72:219–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adolph S, Klein J (1983) Genetic variation of wild mouse populations in Southern Germany. Genet Res 41:117–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Britton-Davidian J (1983) Private communication. MNL 69:35

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker PC (1982) Robertsonian translocations in Mus musculus from N. E. Scotland and Orkney-Heredity 48:305–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comings DE, Avelino E (1972) DNA loss during Robertsonian fusion in studies of the tobacco mouse. Nature, New Biol 237: 199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker C, Cattanach BM (1981) X-ray induction of translocations in mice carrying metacentrics (Robertsonian fusions); detection of whole arm chromosome exchanges. Mutation Res 91:353–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris SD, Sage RD, Prager EM, Ritte U, Wilson AC (1983) Mitochondrial DNA evolution in mice. Genetics 105:681–721

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gropp A, Winking H (1981) Robertsonian translocations: cytology meiosis, segregation patterns and biological consequences of heterozygosity. In: Berry RJ (ed) Biology of the house mouse. Academic Press, London, pp 141–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Gropp A, Winking H, Redi C (1982) Consequences of Robertsonian heterozygosity: Segregational impairment versus male-limited sterility. In: Crosignani PG, Rubin S (eds) The genetic control of gamete production and function Academic Press, Grune & Stratton, pp 115–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu TC, Markvong A, Marshall JT (1978) G-band patterns of six species of mice belonging to the subgenus Mus. Cytogenet Cell Genet 20:304–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sage RD (1981) Wild mice.In: Foster HL, Small ID, Fox ID (eds) The mouse in biomedical research. Academic Press, New York, pp 39–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Said K, Jacquart T, Montgelard C, Sonjaja H, Helel AN, Britton-Davidian (1985) Robertsonian house mouse populations in Tunesia: A karyological and biochemical study. Genetica (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Winking, H. (1986). Some Aspects of Robertsonian Karyotype Variation in European Wild Mice. In: Potter, M., Nadeau, J.H., Cancro, M.P. (eds) The Wild Mouse in Immunology. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol 127. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71304-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71304-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-71306-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-71304-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics