Skip to main content

Origin and Evolution of Mice: An Appraisal of Fossil Evidence and Morphological Traits

  • Conference paper
The Wild Mouse in Immunology

Part of the book series: Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology ((CT MICROBIOLOGY,volume 127))

Abstract

Systematics of mice has progressed during the last 16 years owing to biochemical genetics (Selander et al. 1969, other references to be found mainly in Marshall and Sage 1981, Thaler et al. 1981a, 1981b, Bonhomme, this symposium). Such studies have brought about the collapse of most older ideas which were based on morphology. However the very progress due to genetics has promoted a revival of morphology. The genus Mus as well as its taxonomic components (species, subspecies, chromosomal races), have recently been redefined. The interactions between these taxa (sympatry, parapatry; syntopy and allopatry; various degrees and modes of introgression; direct and indirect competition) are now better understood. These have revealed complex phylogenetic relationships: diverging and reticulate evolution. It now becomes necessary to place the evolution of mice in real time in history, prehistory and geology. Thus, the fossil and subfossil remains of mice have to be studied, morphologically and biometrically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bonhomme F, Iskandar D, Thaler L, Petter F (1984) Electromorphs and phylogeny in muroïd rodents. In: Evolutionary relationships among rodents: A multidisciplinary analysis. WP Luckett & JL Hartenberger, Plenum Pub Corp, New York: 671–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton J and Thaler L (1978) Evidence for the presence of two sympatric species of mice (Genus Mus L.) in southern France based on biochemical genetics. Biochem genet 16:213–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chabbar Ameur R, Jaeger J-J, Michaux J (1976) Radiometric age of early Hipparion fauna in Northwest Africa. Nature 261 (5555): 38–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darviche D (1978) Approche morphologique et biométrique de la biosystématique à la lumière de la génétique biochimique des populations. Application aux genres Mus et Apodemus (Mammalia-Rodentia). Doc. 3ème cycle, Univ. Montpellier 191 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darviche D and Orsini Ph (1982) Critères de différenciation morphologique et biométrique de deux espèces de souris sympatriques: Mus spretus et Mus musculus domesticus. Mammalia 46(2):205–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerassimov S, pers. com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iskandar D and Bonhomme F (1984) Variabilité électrophorétique totale à 11 loci structuraux chez les rongeurs muridés (Muridae, Rodentia). Can J Genet Cytol 26 (5):622–627.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs LL, Pilbeam D (1980) Of Mice and Men: Fossil-based divergence dates and molecular “Clocks”. J Human Evol 9 (7):551–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janossy D (1961) Die Entwicklung der kleinsäugerfauna Europas im Pleistozän (Insectivora, Rodentia, Lagomorpha). Z f Säugetierkunde 26:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JT and Sage RD (1981) Taxonomy of the House Mouse. Symp Zool Soc Lond 47:15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew DF (1977) The endemic pleistocene Murids of Crete. I Proc Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 80:182–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaux J (1971) Muridae Néogènes d’Europe Sud-Occidentale. Paléobiologie continenetale, Montpellier, II (1): 71 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GS (1912) Catalogue of the Mammals of Western Europe. British Museum (Natural History), Londres 1019 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz E and Schwarz HK (1943) The wild and commensal stocks of the house mouse, Mus musculus. J Mammal 24:59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selander RK, Hunt WG and Yang SY (1969) Protein polymorphism and genic heterozygosity in two european subspecies of the house mouse. Evolution 23:379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler L, Bonhomme F, Britton-Davidian J and Hamar M (1981a). The House mouse complex of species: sympatric occurence of biochemical groups Mus 2 and Mus 4 in Rumania. Z f Säugetierkunde 46:169–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler L, Bonhomme F and Britton-Davidian J (1981b). Processes of speciation and semi-speciation in the house mouse. Symp Zool Soc Lond 47:27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe RS, Corti M and Capanna E (1982) Morphometric divergence of Robertsonian populations/species of Mus: A multivariate analysis of size and shape. Experientia 38:920–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Thaler, L. (1986). Origin and Evolution of Mice: An Appraisal of Fossil Evidence and Morphological Traits. In: Potter, M., Nadeau, J.H., Cancro, M.P. (eds) The Wild Mouse in Immunology. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol 127. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71304-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71304-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-71306-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-71304-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics