Skip to main content

Efficiency of CT in Bone Tumors

  • Conference paper
Radiology Today

Part of the book series: Radiology Today ((RADIOL.TODAY,volume 4))

  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

Although plain film remains the most essential diagnostic modality, computed tomography (CT) is considered in many instances as the second most important investigation in bone tumors [10, 20]. With benign tumors CT has usually limited importance: its importance increases with the tumor’s aggressiveness and tendency to infiltrate surrounding tissues. This general statement is particularly true if surgery is considered for certain tumors such as malignant neoplasm of the long bones and of specific complex anatomic areas, e.g., pelvis, spine, thorax, and large joints. The high contrast resolution and the axial view of CT gives unique information in these situations, which is many times indispensable for management of the patients. Usually CT adds less assistance compared to the plain film in arriving at a primary diagnosis. Generally plain film gives a more complete overview and important differential diagnostic features, e.g., the various periosteal reactions are less obvious on CT with tumors of the long bones due to the slice thickness and axial view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alsen AM, Martel WM, Braunstein EM, McMillin KI, Phillips WA, Kling TF (1986) MRI and CT evaluation of primary bone and soft-tissue tumors. AJR 146: 749

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azoz EM, Esseltine DW, Chevalier L, Gledhill RB (1982) Radiologic evaluation of osteosarcoma. J Can Assoc Radiol 33: 167

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coffre C, Vanel D, Contesso G, Kalifa C, Dubousset J, Genin J, Masselot J (1985) Problems and pitfalls in the use of computed tomography for the local evaluation of long bone osteosarcoma: report on 30 cases. Skeletal Radiol 13: 147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Daffner RH, Kirks DR, Geweiler JA, Heaston DK (1982) Computed tomography of fibrous dysplasia. AJR 139: 943

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. De Santos LA, Bernardino ME, Murray JA (1979) Computed tomography in the evaluation of osteosarcoma: experience with 25 cases. AJR 132: 535

    Google Scholar 

  6. Destouet JM, Gilula LA, Murphy WA (1979) Computed tomography of long bone osteosarcoma. Radiology 131: 439

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Enneking WF, Kagan A (1978) Transepiphysed extension of osteosarcoma: incidence, mechanism and implications. Cancer 41: 1526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gamba JL, Martinez S, Apple J, Harreison JM, Nunley J A (1984) Computed tomography of axial skeletal osteoid osteomas. AJR 142: 769

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ginaldi S (1980) Computed tomography feature of synovial osteochondromatosis. Skeletal Radiol 5: 219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Griffiths HJ, Hamlin DJ, Kiss S, Lovelock J (1981) Efficiency of CT scanning in a group of 174 patients with orthopedic and musculoskeletal problems. Skeletal Radiol 7: 87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hermann G, Rose JS, Strauss L (1984) Tumor infiltration of the bone marrow: comparative study using computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 11: 17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hudson TM, Chew FS (1982) Radionucleide bone scanning of osteosarcoma: falsely extended uptake pattern. AJR 139: 49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hudson TM, Schiebler M, Springfield DS, Hawkins IF Jr, Enneking WF, Spanier SS (1983) Radiologic imaging of osteosarcoma. Role in planning surgical treatment. Skeletal Radiol 10: 137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hudson TM, Hamlin DJ, Enneking WF, Pettersson H (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging of bone and soft tissue tumors: early experience in 31 patients compared with computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 13: 134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones ET, Kuhns LR, Arbor A (1981) Pitfalls in the use of computed tomography, for musculoskeletal tumors in children. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 63: 1297

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kenney PJ, Gilula LA, Murphy WA (1981) The use of computed tomography to distinguish osteochondroma and chondrosarcoma. Radiology 139: 129

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Köster O, Distelmaier W, Lackner K (1984) Com- putertomographische Kontrolle konventionell röntgenologischer Befunde bei Raumforderungen des knöchernen Beckens. Fortschtr Röntgenstr 141: 148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumpan W, Lechner G, Wittich GR, Salzer- Kuntschik M, Delling G, Kotz R, Hajek P, Sekera J (1985) The angiographic response of osteosarcoma following pre-operative chemotherapy. Skeletal Radiol 15: 96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Levine E, De Smet AA, Neff JR (1984) Role of radiologic imaging in management planning of giant cell tumor of bone. Skeletal Radiol 12: 79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lukens JA, McLeod RA, Sim FH (1982) Computed tomographic evaluation of primary osseous malignant neoplasms. AJR 139: 45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mail JT, Cohen MD, Mirkin LD, Provisor AJ (1985) Response of osteosarcoma to preoperative intravenous high dose methotrexate chemotherapy: CT evaluation. AJR 144: 89

    Google Scholar 

  22. Majewski A, Freyschmidt J (1982) Computertomographie bei Tumoren des Beckenskeletts Fortschr Röntgenstr 136 (6): 635–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pozniak M, Petasnick JP, Matalon TAS, Bayard WJ (1985) Computed tomography in the differential diagnosis of pelvic and extrapelvic disease. Radio- Graphics 5: 587

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ramos A, Castello J, Sartorius DJ, Greenway GD, Resnick D, Haghighi P (1985) Osseous lipoma: CT appearance. Radiology 157: 615

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shikhoda A, Jaffe N, Wallace S, Ayala A, Lindell M, Zorinoza J (1985) Computed tomography of osteosarcoma after intra-arterial chemotherapy. AJR 144: 95

    Google Scholar 

  26. Simon MA, Kirchner PT (1980) Scintigraphic evaluation of primary bone tumors. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 62: 758

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Solomon A, Rahamani R, Seligsohn U, Ben-Artzi F (1984) Multiple myeloma: early vertebral involvement assessed by computerized tomography. Skeletal Radiol 11: 258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lechner, G., Karnel, F., Kumpan, W., Schratter, M., Ritschl, P. (1987). Efficiency of CT in Bone Tumors. In: Heuck, F.H.W., Donner, M.W. (eds) Radiology Today. Radiology Today, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71285-2_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71285-2_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-71287-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-71285-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics