Topographic Analysis of Neurologic Symptoms in Brain Stem Diseases
In cases of large space-occupying or destructive lesions the topographic assignment of brain stem processes is easily made using cranial computerized tomography (CCT) or nuclear magnetic resonance. However, these technical tools often fail if the tissue alteration is small or does not contrast to the surrounding tissue. In these cases and when technical procedures cannot be performed the topographic assignment must be done only with the clinical examination. F.i. in Wernicke’s encephalopathy a positive CCT is an exception (Fig. 1 ). Usually the diagnosis is made by clinical examination.
KeywordsIschemia Adduct Neurol Meningitis Gentamicin
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Daroff RB, Hoyt WF (1971) Supranuclear disorders of ocular control system in man: clinical and physiological correlations. In: Bach-y-Rita P, Collins CC, Hyde JE (eds) The Control of Eye Movements. Academic Press, New York, 17/5Google Scholar
- Elschnig A (1913) Nystagmus retractorius: Ein zerebrales Herdsymptom. Med Klin 9: 8–11Google Scholar
- Keane JR, Rawlinson DG, Lu AT (1976) Sustained downward deviation. Two cases without structural pretectallesions. Neurology (NY) 26: 594–595Google Scholar
- King WM, Lisberger AG, Fuchs AF (1976) Response of fibers in medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) of alert monkeys during horizontal and vertical conjugate eye movements evoked by vestibular or visuli stimuli. J Neurophysiol 65: 135–1149Google Scholar
- Salomon J (1971) Atlas de la vascularisation arterielle du cerveau chez l’homme. Sandoz Editions, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Smith JL, David NJ (1964) Internuclear ophthalmoplegia. Two new clinical signs. Neurology (NY) 14: 307–309Google Scholar
- Smith JL, David NJ, Klintworth G (1964) Skew deviation. Neurology (NY) 14: 96–105Google Scholar
- Souadjian JV , Cain JC (1938) Intractable hiccup. Etiologic factors in 220 cases. Postgrad Med 43: 72–77Google Scholar
- Stewart JD, Kirkham TH, Mathieson G (1979) Periodic alternating gaze. Neurology (NY) 29: 222–224Google Scholar