Stoma or No Stoma in Intestinal Transplantation
More effective methods of host and donor organ immunosuppression and improved microvascular techniques have led to increased interest in small-bowel transplantation in various experimental models. Prior to this decade, intestinal graft loss was frequently the result of technical problems of vascular thrombosis or hemorrhage and in some studies approached 40%–50%. Recently, the reported early graft failure from arterial or venous thrombosis has been less than 10% (Dilez-Perez et al. 1984; Pritchard et al. 1985). The use of cyclosporine as an immunosuppressive has resulted in prolonged intestinal allograft survival (Craddock et al. 1983; Dilez- Perez et al. 1984). Although interest in clinical trials is being rekindled by the improvement in experimental results, it is clear that there are still many unanswered questions about the technical aspects of small-bowel transplantation.
KeywordsSmall Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth Intestinal Anastomosis Intestinal Transplantation Small Bowel Transplantation Intestinal Continuity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ahonen A, Nemlander A, Wiktorowitz K, von Willebrand E, Hekali R, Lalla M, Hayry P (1983) Effect of cyclosporine on wound healing. Transplant Proc 15: 3092Google Scholar
- Atkinson K, Britten K, Pauli P, Farrell C, Concannon A, Dodds A, Biggs J (1983) Detrimental effect of intestinal disease on absorption of orally administered cyclosporine. Transplant Proc 15: 2446Google Scholar
- Cassidy S, Verdenheimer MC (1985) Complications of intestinal stomas. Probl Gen Surg 2: 545Google Scholar
- Cohen Z, Nordgren SR, Mackenzie RD, Lossing AG, Stiller CR, Langer B (1983) Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in a canine intestinal transplantation model. Transplant Proc 15: 3013Google Scholar
- Deltz E, Ulrichs K, Engemann R, Schack T, Friedrichs B, Muller-Ruchholtz W, Muller-Hermelink HK, Thiede A (1983) Prevention of graft-versus-host reaction following small bowel transplantation by temporary cyclosporine treatment. Transplant Proc 15: 3027Google Scholar
- Hardy MA, Quint J, Cohen WB, State D (1968) 14C-D-glucose absorption in heterotopic jejunal allografts. Gastroenterology 54: 1295Google Scholar
- Irwin TT (1978) Effects of malnutrion and hyperalimentation on wound healing. Surg Gynecol Obstet 146: 33Google Scholar
- Lossing A, Nordgren S, Cohen Z, Cullen J, Craddock G, Langer B (1983) Histologic monitoring of rejection in small intestinal transplantation. Transplant Proc 14: 643Google Scholar
- Mouchick GJ, Rüssel PS (1971) Transplantation of small bowel in the rat: Technical and immunologic considerations. Surgery 70: 693Google Scholar
- Ricour C, Revillon Y, Arnaud-Ballandier F, Ghnassia D, Weyne P, Lauffenberger A, Jos J, Fontaine JL, Gallix P, Vaiman M (1983) Successful small bowel allografts in piglets using cyclosporine A. Transplant Proc 15: 3019Google Scholar
- Stanford WP, Hardy MA (1974) Fatty acid absorption in jejunal autograft and allograft. Surgery 75: 495–502Google Scholar
- Toledo-Pereyra LH, Raij L, Simmons RL, Najarian JS (1974) Role of endotoxin and bacteria in long- term survival of preserved small-bowel allografts. Surgery 73: 474Google Scholar