Advertisement

Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior in Psychotherapy Research: A Comparison Between Two Methods

  • Fernando Lolas
  • Erhard Mergenthaler
  • Michael von Rad

Abstract

Content analysis of verbal behavior is a research technique for making inferences by systematically and objectively identifying specified characteristics in spoken or written language. By developing categories of speech units, content analytic procedures are designed to specify judgmental processes and transform intuitive evaluations into explicit rules (9, 16).

Keywords

Verbal Behavior Content Category Death Anxiety Emotional Meaning Psychotherapy Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gleser GC, Lubin A (1979) Response productivity in verbal content analysis: a critique of Marsden, Kalter, and Ericson. In: Gottschalk LA (ed) The content analysis of verbal behavior: further studies. Spectrum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gottschalk LA (1979) The content analysis of verbal behavior: further studies. Spectrum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gottschalk LA, Bechtel RJ (1982) The measurement of anxiety through the computer analysis of verbal samples. Compr Psychiatry 23: 364–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gottschalk LA, Gleser GC (1969) The measurement of psychological states through the content analysis of verbal behavior. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gottschalk LA, Hausman C, Brown JS (1975) A computerized scoring system for use with content analysis scales. Compr Psychiatry 16: 77–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gottschalk LA, Winget CN, Gleser GC (1969) Manual of instructions for using the Gottschalk-Gleser content analysis scales: anxiety, hostility, and social alienation-personal disorganization. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grünzig HJ, Holzscheck K, Kachele H (1976) EVA — Ein Programmsystem zur maschinellen Inhaltsanalyse von Psychotherapieprotokollen. Med Psychol 2: 208–217Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laffal J (1965) Pathological and normal language. Atherton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lisch R, Kriz J (1978) Grundlagen und Modelle der Inhaltsanalyse. Rowohlt, ReinbeckGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lolas F, von Rad M (1982) Communication of emotional meaning: a biopsychosocial dimension in psychosomatics. In: Day SB (ed) Life stress. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lolas F, von Rad M, Scheibler D (1981) Situational influences on verbal affective expression of psychosomatic and psychoneurotic patients. J Nerv Ment Dis 169: 619–623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mergenthaler E (1979) Das Textkorpus in der psychoanalytischen Forschung. In: Bergenholtz H, Schäder B (eds) Empirische Textwissenschaft. Scriptor, KronbergGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mergenthaler E, Büscher U (1978) Elektronische Verbalanalyse (EVA-Textanalyse System). User’s Handbook. Unpublished. Department of Psychotherapy, University of Ulm, UlmGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Speidel H (1979) Entwicklung und Validierung eines Wörterbuches zur maschinell-inhalts-analytischen Erfassung psychoanalytischer Angstthemen. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Konstanz and University of Ulm, KonstanzGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spence DP (1980) Lawfulness in lexical choice: a natural experiment. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 28: 115–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stone PJ, Dunphy DC, Smith MS, Ogilvie DM (1966) The general inquirer: a computer ap-proach to content analysis. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Von Rad M, Drücke M, Knauss W, Lolas F (1979). Alexithymia: anxiety and hostility in psychosomatic and psychoneurotic patients. Psychother Psychosom 31: 223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Von Rad M, Lolas F (1978) Psychosomatische und psychoneurotische Patienten im Vergleich. Unterschiede des Sprechverhaltens. Psyche 32: 956–973Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando Lolas
  • Erhard Mergenthaler
  • Michael von Rad

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations