High T-Dependence of Local Order in Magnetic FeM Alloys from Neutron Diffuse Scattering

  • V. Pierron-Bohnes
  • M. C. Cadeville
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 10)


We present in this paper the first “in situ” at high temperature investigation of the atomic short-range order (SRO) T-dependence in magnetic alloys by neutron diffuse scattering (NDS). Up to now analogous experimental studies were done on quenched samples by either NMR in dilute alloys [1–3] or NDS in concentrated ones [2, 4, 5]. NDS was generally done at room or at 4 K temperature in alloys annealed and quenched. In the large samples necessary for neutron experiments, the equilibrium state at the annealing temperature T can be frozen in by a quench only for low values of T . At such temperatures, the annealing time necessary to attain equilibrium makes it impossible to vary T on a large range. This limitation can be overcome by doing “in situ” at temperature measurements. NDS is then the most suitable technique because it allows one to separate the elastic contribution in contrast to X-rays. In this work, we focus on the high-temperature aspects of these NDS measurements: metallurgy and Debye-Waller factors; the paramagnetic contribution evaluation will be detailed elsewhere. We show that in spite of all these difficulties and in spite of the increased noise due to the oven and the smoothing of SRO at high temperature, it is possible to perform such measurements and so to obtain SRO parameters at temperatures as high as 1500 K.


Neutron Beam Paramagnetic Contribution Pair Interaction Energy Metallurgical Aspect Ferromagnetic Contribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V. Pierron-Bohnes, M.C. Cadeville, F. Gautier: J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 13 1689 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 1a.
    V. Pierron-Bohnes, M.C. Cadeville, F. Gautier: “Phase Transformation in Solids”, Symp. Maleme, Creete, 1983, p. 401, ed. by Tsakalakos (North-Holland).Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    I. Mirebeau, Cadeville M.C, Parette G., Campbell I.A.: J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 12, 25 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    V. Pierron-Bohnes, I. Mirebeau, E. Balanzat, M.C. Cadeville: J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 14, 197 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    V. Pierron-Bohnes, M.C. Cadeville, G. Parette: J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 15, 1441 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    I. Mirebeau, M. Hennion, G. Parette: Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 687 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    I. Mirebeau:, Third Cycle Thesis, Orsay (1982).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    P.J. Brown, J. Deportes, D. Givord, K.R.A. Ziebeck: Proc. of Workshop on 3d Metallic Magnetism, Grenoble (August 1983).Google Scholar
  9. 7a.
    G. Shirane, O. Steinwell, Y.J. Uemura, J. Wicksted: J. Appl. Phys. 55 (6) 1887 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 8.
    S. Radelaar: J. Chem. Solids 27, 1375 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 9.
    K. Gschwend, H. Sato, R. Kikuchi: J. Chem. Phys. 69, 5006 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 10.
    S.G. Fishman, D. Gupta, D.S. Lieberman; Phys. Rev. B 2, 1451 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 10a.
    G. Henry, G. Barreau, G. Cizeron; C.R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. Ser. C, 280, (16) 1007 (10) (1975).Google Scholar
  14. 11.
    F. Gautier, A. Bieber: private communication.Google Scholar
  15. 12.
    V. Pierron-Bohnes, M.C. Cadeville, A. Bieber, F. Gautier: ICM’85, San Francisco, to be published in J. Mag. Mag. Mat.Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    P.C. Clapp, S.C Moss: Phys. Rev. 171, 535 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Pierron-Bohnes
    • 1
  • M. C. Cadeville
    • 1
  1. 1.L.M.S.E.S. (UA CNRS no 306)Université Louis PasteurStrasbourg CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations