Advertisement

Comparative TEM, FIM and SANS Study of the Cu-2 at.% Co Decomposition

  • H. P. Degischer
  • J. Piller
  • W. Wagner
  • H. Wollenberger
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 10)

Abstract

Conventional Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Field Ion Microscopy (FIM) and Small-Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) are frequently applied methods for investigations of precipitation processes in alloys. They are in principle well suited for such investigations; however, in view of an increasing interest in distinct early decomposition stages, a classification of the methods with respect to resolution limit, accuracy and reliability in decomposition studies is urgently desired [1,2]. For this purpose, the three methods were applied together to investigate the alloy Cu-2 at.% Co. The system CuCo is known to form spherical precipitates of the Co-rich α-phase dispersed in a matrix of almost Dure Cu [3]. The present combined study was just published in details elsewhere [4]. Here, we briefly review the results, focusing on different procedures of SANS evaluations using the complementary informations obtained by FIM and TEM. We show how the investigations can thus be extended to such early stages which could not be evaluated quantitatively up to now, if only one of the methods is applied.

Keywords

Conventional Transmission Electron Microscopy SANS Data Precipitate Radius SANS Measurement SANS Curve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Decomposition of Alloys: The Early Stages, Proc. 2nd Acta-Scripta Conf., Sonnenberg, Eds. P. Haasen, V. Gerold, R. Wagner, M.F. Ashby, Pergamon Press, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.M. Pound: Met. Trans. 16A, 487 (1985)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Nembach and M. Martin: Acta Metall. 28, 1069 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Wagner, J. Piller, H.P. Degischer and H. Wollenberger: Z. Metallkunde 76 no. 10 (1985)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.F. Ashby and L.M. Brown: Phil. Mag. 8, 1083 and 1649 (1963)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Fratzl, J.L. Lebowitz, J. Marro and M.H. Kalos: Acta Metall. 31, 1849 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I.M. Lifshitz and V.V. Slyozov, Phys. Chem. Solids 19, 35 (1961)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Wendt and P. Haasen, Scripta Metall, 19, 1053 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. P. Degischer
    • 1
  • J. Piller
    • 1
  • W. Wagner
    • 1
  • H. Wollenberger
    • 1
  1. 1.Hahn-Meitner-Institut für Kernforschung BerlinBerlin 39Germany

Personalised recommendations