Advertisement

The Characterization of Fractal Measures as Interwoven Sets of Singularities: Global Universality at the Transition to Chaos

  • I. Procaccia
Part of the Springer Series in Synergetics book series (SSSYN, volume 32)

Abstract

The most dramatic event in the development of the modern theory of the onset of chaos in dynamical systems has been the discovery of universality [1]. Especially well known are the universal numbers α and δ, which in the context of period doubling pertain to the universal scaling properties of the 2 cycle near its critical point, and the rate of accumulation of pitchfork bifurcations in parameter space respectively [1], This type of universality is however local, being limited to behavior in the vicinity of an isolated point either in phase space or in parameter space. In this paper I wish to review some recent progress in elucidating the globally universal properties of dynamical systems at the onset of chaos. This progress has been achieved in collaboration with M.H. JENSEN, A. LIBCHABER, L.P. KADANOFF, T.C. HALSEY, B. SHRAIMAN and J. STAVANS [2-4]. In “global universality” we mean that an orbit in phase space has metric universality as a whole set or that a whole range of parameter space can be shown to have universal properties [5]. Examples that have been worked out recently include the 2 cycle of period doubling, the orbit on a 2-torus with golden-mean winding number at the onset of chaos and the complementary set to the mode-locking tongues in the 2-frequency route to chaos. The approach used is however quite general, as will become apparent below.

Keywords

Partition Function Rayleigh Number Universal Property Universality Class Fractal Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M.J. Feigenbaum: J. Stat. Phys. 19, 25 (1978)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T.C. Halsey, P. Meakin and I. Procaccia: Phys. Rev. Lett., submittedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T.C. Halsey, M.H. Jensen, L.P. Kadanoff, I. Procaccia and B. Shraiman, Phys. Rev. A, submittedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.H. Jensen, A. Libchaber, L.P. Kadanoff, I. Procaccia and J. Stavans, Phys. Rev. Lett., submittedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    See also the paper by J.D. Farmer in this volumeGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The fact that fractal measures should be characterized by a spectrum of numbers rather than by one fractal dimension seems to have been stressed firstly by B.B. MANDELBROT. See for example J. Fluid Mech. 62, 331 (1979); Stat. Phys. 13i, Ann. Israel Phys. Soc. 225 (1977). In the context of turbulence this realization has led MANDELBROT to the often quoted inequalities between the intermittency exponent and the codimension of turbulence.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.J. Shenker, Physica 5D, 405 (1982)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.G.E. Hentschel and I. Procaccia, Physica 8D, 435 (1983)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, Phys. Lett. 50, 346 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Phvsics 9D, 189 (1983)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    I. Procaccia, Physics Scripta T59, 40 (1985)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    P. Grassberger, J. Stat. Phys. 26, 173 (1981)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    M.H. Jensen, P. Bak and T. Bohr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1637 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Phys. Rev. A30, 1960 (1984)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 13.
    P. Cvitanovic, M.H. Jensen, L.P. Kadanoff and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 343 (1985)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 14.
    See for example P. Cvitanovic, B. Shraiman and B. Sodeberg, Nordita preprint (1985); M.J. Feigenbaum, Cornell preprint (1985)Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    M.J. Feigenbaum, L.P. Kadanoff and S.J. Shenker, Physica 5D, 370 (1982)MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 16.
    S. Ostlund, D. Rand, J.P. Sethna and E.D. Siggia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 132 (1982)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 17.
    J. Stavans, F. Heslot and A. Libchaber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 596 (1985)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Procaccia
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical PhysicsThe Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations