Skip to main content

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASIG,volume 11))

Abstract

As with any massive program, fruit fly programs have had their difficulties. The major problems which have resulted in failure appear to arise from four major sources: 1) adoption of the “cannot fail syndrome”, 2) goal displacement, 3) incomplete consequence analysis, and 4) failure to question. Each represents an organizational mindset. Failures in fruit fly progrms are organizational not individual in nature. The “cannot fail syndrome” represents the belief that if a process is done correctly it cannot fail; therefore, why bother to monitor success, merely monitor the process. Goal displacement occurs when the execution of a program becomes more important than the original goal of the program. Incomplete consequence analysis is the incomplete identification of those functions in which failure carries unacceptable consequences. Failure to question is the blind following of historical precedents either as executed in previous program or as found “in the literature”. Examples of each type of failure are given in the text.

The likehood of failure can be reduced by external reviews of project policies and procedures and by an effective, reciprocal information flow between project workers and management at all levels — not just along the chain of command, but across project organizational units, also.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Andrew, C.O., Cato, J. C., and Prochaska, F. J., 1977. Potential eonomic impact of a fruit fly infestation on the U.S. Citrus Industry. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 90: 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. C., Stone, W. 6., Plummer, C. C. and McPhail, M. 1944. A review of studies on the Mexican fruit fly and related species. USDA Misc. Pub. 531. 155 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beroza, M., Green, N. , Certler, S. I., Steiner, L. F. and Miyashita, D. H., 1961. New attractants for the Mediterranean fruit fly. Agric. Food & Chem. 9:361–365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D., Carey, J., Cunningham, R., Dowell, R., and Rice, R., 1985. Oriental Fruit Fly Program Critique. CDF A unpub. Rpt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchil1-Stanland, C. USDA APHIS. Guatemala Personal Communication

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchil1-Stanland, C., Stanland, R., Wong, T. T. I, Tanaka, N., Mclnnis, D. O., and Dowell, R. In press. Size as a factor in the mating propensity of the Mediterranean fruit fly. Ceratitis capitata (Weidemann), (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the laboratory. J. Econ. Entomol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. A. Program Supervisor, CDFA, Sacramento, CA. Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, R. T., Routhier, W., Harris, E. J., Cunningham, G., Tanaka, N., Oshinata, K., Johnston, L., Edwards, W., Rosander, R., and Vettel, W. G., 1976. Insect Eradication by Sterile Male Release: A Case Study, the Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Los Angeles. CDFA pub. 50 PP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. V., 1983. Environmental assessment of the Mexican Fruit fly and its eradication in California 1983–1984 Program. CDFA pub. 95 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. V., 1984. Environmental assessment of the Mexican Fruit fly and its eradication in California. CDFA pub. 29 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. V., 1985a. Environmental assessment of the Mexican Fruit fly and its eradication in California. CDFA pub. 96 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. V. 1985b. Surveillance and control of exotic insect pests in California. Bull. Soc. Vector Ecol. 10: 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. V. 1985b. Surveillance and control of exotic insect pests in California. Bull. Soc. Vector Ecol. 10: 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flitters, N. E., and Messenger, D. S., 1958. Effect of temperature and humidity on development and distribution of Hawaiian and Mexican fruit flies. J. Rio Grande Valley Hort. Soc. 12: 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A. J., Bingham, R. R., Beavers, M. M., and Clark, R. A., 1985. Insect Trapping Guide. CDFA pub. 78 pp. (Revised).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gjullin, C. M., 1931. Probable distribution of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata Weid) in the United States. Ecology 12: 248–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, P. A. and Dowell, R. V., 1984. Environmental assessment of the Caribbean fruit fly and its eradication in California — 1984 Program. CDFA pub. 78 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. J., Nakagawa, S., and Urago, T., 1971. Sticky traps for detection and survey of three tephritids. J. Econ. Entomol. 64: 62–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, G. H. S., 1978. Effect of combining methyl eugenol and cuelure on the capture of male tephritid fruit flies. J. Aust. Ent. Soc. 17: 189–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, F. and Bercerril, O. H., 1967. Sodium borate inhibits decomposition of two protein hydrolysates attractive to the Mexican fruit fly. J. Econ. Entomol. 60: 137–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, F. and Bercerril, O. H., 1967. Sodium borate inhibits decomposition of two protein hydrolysates attractive to the Mexican fruit fly. J. Econ. Entomol. 60: 137–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, F., Spishakoff, L. M., and Becerril, O. H., 1967. Pelletized lures for trapping the Mexican fruit fly. J. Econ. Entomol. 61: 316–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, S., Suda, D., Urago, T., and Harris, E. J., 1975. Gallon plastic tub: a substitute for the McPhail trap. J. Econ. Entomol. 68: 405–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odoemelam, O. O., and Dowell, R. V., 1984. Environmental assessment of the Oriental fruit fly and its eradication in California. CDFA pub. 511 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmiller, C., 1982. Medfly Eradication Project: Chronology of Events. CDFA pub. 130 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poucher, C. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Winter Haven, Fl. Personal Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhode, R. H., and Sanchez, M., 1982. Field evaluation of McPhail and gallon plastic tub traps against Mexican fruit fly. Southwestern Entomol. 7: 98–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, J., 1983. The medfly in California: Organization of the eradication program and public policy. Hort. Science 18: 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, L. F. 1957. Low-cost plastic fruit fly trap. J. Econ. Entomol. 50: 508–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, L. F., Miyashita, D. H., and Christenson, L. D., 1957. Angelica oils as Mediterranean fruit fly lures. J. Econ. Entomol. 50: 505.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. H., 1983. Response of Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae) to Ocimum sanctum (Linn.) extracts and different attractants in Penang, Malaysia in Fruit Flies of Economic Importance, A.A. Balkema pub. R. Cavalloro (ed).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dowell, R.V., Wange, L.K. (1986). Process Analysis and Failure Avoidance in Fruit Fly Programs. In: Mangel, M., Carey, J.R., Plant, R.E. (eds) Pest Control: Operations and Systems Analysis in Fruit Fly Management. NATO ASI Series, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70883-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70883-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70885-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70883-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics