Advertisement

The Conceptual Role of Intelligence in Human Sociobiology

  • Paul Thompson
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 17)

Abstract

In this paper I discuss some of the logical and methodological features of evolutionary explanations of intelligence-based human behavior. Hence, the main thrust of the paper will be theoretical attempting to set out the conceptual role and importance of theories of cognition and neurobiology in applying evolutionary theory to the explanation of human behavior. My main thesis is that evolutionary explanations of human behavior involve complex causal chains the links of which are justified by reference to numerous quite distinct theoretical frameworks. Among these theoretical frameworks are theories of cognitive psychology and neurobiology that connect cognition to behavior, and theories of cultural transmission of information and behavior patterns. My central goal is to provide a theoretical framework for understanding the need for, and the logic and methodology underlying, such causal chains.

Keywords

Human Behavior Evolutionary Theory Causal Chain Semantic Conception Theoretical Term 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen E, et al., (1976) Sociobiology: another biological determinism. Bioscience 26: 182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beatty J (1980) Optimal-design models and the stategy of model building in evolutionary biology. Phil of Sci 47:532–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beatty J (1981) What’s wrong with the received view of evolutionary theory? In Asquith, PD and Giere, RN (eds.) PSA 1980. vol 2, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 397–426Google Scholar
  4. Braithwaite RB (1953) Scientific Explanation Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Burian R (1978) A methodological critique of sociobiology. In Caplan AL (ed) The Sociobiology Debate Harper & Row, New York, pp. 376–395Google Scholar
  6. Caplan AL (1978) The Sociobiological Debate Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Carnap R (1936) Testability and meaning 1. Phil of Sci 3: 420–468Google Scholar
  8. Carnap R (1937) Testability and meaning 2. Phil of Sci 4:1–40Google Scholar
  9. Gould SJ ( 1976 ) Biological potential vs biological determinism. Nat Hist Mag MayGoogle Scholar
  10. Gould SJ (1978) Sociobiology: the art of storytelling. New Scientist 80: 530–533Google Scholar
  11. Hempel CG (1965) Aspects of scientific explanation The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Hempel CG (1967) Philosophy of natural science. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  13. Hull D (1974) Philosophy of biological science. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewontin R (1974) The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia University Press, ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewontin R (1977) Sociobiology: a caricature of darwinism. In Suppe F, Asquith PD (eds) PSA 1976, vol. 2. Philosophy of Science Association, East LansingGoogle Scholar
  16. Lloyd E (1984) A semantic approach to the structure of population genetics. Phil of Sci 51: 242–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lumsden C, Wilson EO (1981) Genes, mind and culture. Harvard University Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  18. Lumsden C, Wilson EO (1983) Promethean fire. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Montague A (ed) (1980) Sociobiology examined. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Plotkin HC, Odling-Smee FJ (1981) A multiple-level model of evolution and its implications for sociobiology. Behav Brain Sci 4: 225–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Putnam H (1962) What theories are not. In Nagel E, et al. (eds) Logic, methodology and philosophy of science. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 240–251Google Scholar
  22. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (1978) A dual inheritance model of the human evolutionary process: I basic postulates and a simple model. J of Soc Bio Struct 1: 127–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Richerson PJ, Boyd R (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenberg A (1985) The structure of biological science. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruse M (1973) The philosophy of biology. Hutchinson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruse M ( 1986 ) Taking Darwin seriously. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruse M, Wilson EO (1986) Ethics as applied science. PhilosophyGoogle Scholar
  28. Sahlins MD (1976) The uses and abuses of biology. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  29. Sneed J (1971) The logical structure of mathematical physics. D. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sober E (1981) Holism, individualism, and the units of selection. In Asquith PD, Giere RN (eds) PSA 1980, vol 2. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 93–121Google Scholar
  31. Stegmuller W (1976) The structure and dynamics of theories. Springer Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Suppe F (1972) What’s wrong with the received view on the structure of scientific theories? Phil of Sci. 39: 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Suppe F (1976) The structure of scientific theories. University of Illinois Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  34. Suppe F (1977) Theoretical laws. In Prezlecki M, et al., (eds) Formal methods in the methodology of the empirical sciences. Ossolineum, Wroclaw, pp. 247–267Google Scholar
  35. Suppes P (1957) Introduction to logic. Van Nostrand, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  36. Suppes P (1967) What is a scientific theory? In Morgenbesser S (ed) Philosophy of science today. Basic Books, New York, pp. 55–67Google Scholar
  37. Thompson P (1983) The structure of evolutionary theory: a semantic approach. Stud in Hist and Phil of Sci 14: 215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson P (1985) Sociobiological explanation and the testability of sociobiological theory. In Fetzer JH (ed) Sociobiology and epistemology. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thompson P (1986) The interaction of theories and the semantic account of evolutionary theory. Philosophica 37:73–86Google Scholar
  40. Thompson P (1987) A defence of the semantic conception of theories Bio and Phil 2: 26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. van Fraassen BC (1970) On the extension of Beth’s semantics of physical theories. Phil of Sci 37: 325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Fraassen BC (1974) A formal approach to the philosophy of science. In Colodney RE (ed) Paradigms and Paradoxes. Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 303–366Google Scholar
  43. van Fraassen BC (1980) The scientific image. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations