Advertisement

Stomate-Dependent and Stomate-Independent Uptake of NOX, and Effects on Photosynthesis, Respiration and Transpiration of Potted Plants

Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 16)

Abstract

Cultivars of the most commonly grown potted plants in Danish commercial greenhouses were exposed to CO2, NO, NO2 gases, alone or in combination. Gas uptake and effects on net photosynthesis, dark respiration and transpiration were measured before, during and after the exposures. Carbon dioxide stimulated net photosynthesis (41%) and subsequent dark respiration (24%), while transpiration was reduced (10%). The NO exposure of 1 μL.L−1 NO reduced photosynthesis (20%) and transpiration (18% at high (CO2), but did not affect respiration. NO2 rarely had significant effects. All the effects of the gases on photosynthesis and transpiration were reversible and had independent mechanisms, while effects on respiration were non-reversible in clean air.

NO2 uptake by the eight cultivars was related to transpiration, i.e., open stomates, while NO uptake was not dependent on stomatal opening. NO was taken up at a constant rate throughout the light period, while NO2 uptake decreased towards the end of the day, as did transpiration. Uptake of NO2 in the dark was reduced as much as transpiration.

At the same concentration, NO was four times more inhibitory to photosynthesis than NO2. Relative to uptake, NO was 22 times more toxic than NO2. 60 must therefore have a potent mechanism of toxicity, different from that of NO2.

The higher NO-dose, which reduced transpiration because the stomata closed, reduced photosynthesis less than a lower NO-dose. Since total NO uptake was not dependent on stomatal aperture, but stomatal closure reduced the NO-effect on photosynthesis, it could be suggested that stomata regulate the effective NO uptake (i.e. the small fraction affecting photosynthesis).

The difference in the sensitivity of the cultivars to NO and NO2 did not correlate with the uptake of either pollutant gas.

Short-term effects (four days) of CO2 + NO on photosynthesis were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with previously observed long-term effects (four to five months) on the dry weight ofthe same cultivars in similar treatments.

Keywords

Dark Respiration Stomatal Opening Stomatal Aperture Hedera Helix Assimilation Chamber 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Admuson RG, Weinstein LH (1981) Joint action of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide on foliar injury and stomatal behavior in soybean. J Environ Qual 10 (2): 204–206Google Scholar
  2. Carlson RW (1983) Interaction between SO2 and NO2 and their effects on photosynthetic properties of soybean Glycine max. Environ Pollut (A) 32: 11–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elkiey T, Ormrod DP (1981a) Sorption of O3, SO2, NO2 or their mixture by nine Poa pratensis cultivars of differing pollutant sensitivities. Atmos Environ 15 (9): 1739–1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elkiey T, Ormrod DP (1981b) Absorption of ozone, sulphur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide by Petunia plants. Environ Exper Bot 21:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freer-Smith PH (1985) The influence of SO2 and NO2 on the growth, development and gas exchange of Betula pendula Roth. New Phytol 99: 417–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Johansson C (1984) Field measurements of emission of nitric oxide from fertilized an unfertilized forest soils in Sweden. J Atmos Chem 1: 429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lane PI, Bell JNB (1984a) The effects of simulated urban air pollution on grass yield: Part I - Description and simulation of ambient pollution. Environ Pollut (B) 8: 245–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lane PI, Bell JNB (1984b) The effects of simulated urban air pollution on grass yield: Part 2 - Performance of Lolium perenne, Phleum pratense and Dactylis glomerate fumigated with SO2, NO2 and/or NO. Environ Pollut (A) 35: 97–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Law RM, Mansfield TA (1982) Oxides of nitrogen and the greenhouse atmosphere. In: Unsworth MH, Ormrod DP (eds) Effects of gaseous air pollution in agriculture and horticulture. Butterworth, London, p 93–112Google Scholar
  10. Mansfield TA. Freer-Smith PH (1981) Effects of urban air pollution on plant growth. Biol Rev 56: 343–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin A, Barber FR (1984) Acid gases and acid in rain monitored for over 5 years in rural east-central England. Atmos Environ 18(9): 1715–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mortensen LM (1984) The effect of nitrogen oxides (NOX during CO2 enrichment on some greenhouse plants. Acta Horti 162: 285–287Google Scholar
  13. Murray AJS (1984) Light affects the deposition of NO2 to the Flacca mutant of tomato without affecting the rate of transpiration. New Phyto 98: 447–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Natori T, Totsuka T (1984) Effects of mixed gas on transpiration rate of several woody plants. 2. Synergistic effects of mixed gas on transpiration rate of Euonymus japonica. Research Reports from the National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan, 65Google Scholar
  15. Reinert RA, Shriner DS and Rawlings JO (1982) Responses of radish to all combinations of three concentrations of nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide, and ozone. J Environ Qual 11(1): 52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Saxe H, Christensen OV (1985) Effects of carbon dioxide with and without nitric oxide pollution on growth, morphogenesis and production time of pot plants. Environ Pollut (A) 38: 159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences, McGraw-Hill, London, p 202–213Google Scholar
  18. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1976) Statistical methods, 6th edn, New York, Iowa State University PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Wellburn AR (1982) Effects of SO2 and NO2 on metabolic function. In: Unsworth MH, Ormrod DP (eds) Effects of gaseous air pollution in agriculture and horticulture. Butterworth, London, p 169–187Google Scholar
  20. Whitmore ME (1985) Relationship between dose of SO2 and NO2 mixtures and growth of Poa pratensis. New Phytol 99: 545–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Saxe
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Plant Physiology and AnatomyRoyal Veterinary and Agricultural UniversityFrederiksberg CDenmark

Personalised recommendations