Skip to main content

A Fòrmalization of Commonsense Reasoning Based on Fuzzy Logic

  • Conference paper
Book cover Wissensbasierte Systeme

Part of the book series: Informatik-Fachberichte ((2252,volume 112))

Abstract

The basic idea underlying the approach outlined in this paper is that commonsense knowledge may be regarded as a collection of dispositions, that is, propositions which are preponderantly, but not necessarily always, true. Technically, a disposition may be interpreted as a proposition with implicit fuzzy quantifiers, e.g., most, almost all, usually, often etc. For example, a disposition such as Swedes are blond may be interpreted as most Swedes are blond For purposes of inference from commonsense knowledge, the conversion of a disposition into a proposition with explicit fuzzy quantifiers sets the stage for an application of syllogistic reasoning in which the premises are allowed to be of the form Q A’s are B’s whereA and B are fuzzy predicates and Q is a fuzzy quantifier. In general, the conclusion yielded by such reasoning is a proposition which may be converted into a disposition through the suppression of fuzzy quantifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Related Publications

  1. J. Doyle, “A truth-maintenance system,” Artificial Intelligence 12, pp. 231–272, 1979.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Dubois and H. Prade, Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. New York: Academic Press, 1980.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J.A. Goguen, “The logic of inexact concepts,” Synthese 19, pp. 325–373, 1969.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Kaufmann and M.M. Gupta, Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic. New York: Van Nostrand, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E.H. Mamdani and B.R. Gaines, Fuzzy Reasoning and its Applications. London: Academic Press, 1981.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. J. McCarthy. “Circumscription: A non-monotonic inference rule,” Artificial Intelligence 13, pp. 27–40, 1980.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. D.V. McDermott and J. Doyle. “Non-monotonic logic. I.” Artificial Intelligence 13, pp. 41–72, 1980.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. D.V. McDermott. “Non-monotonic logic, II: nonmonotonic modal theories.” J. Assoc. Comp. Mach 29, pp. 33–57, 1982.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. R.C. Moore and J.R. Hobbs, (eds.), Formal Theories of the Commonsense World. Harwood. NJ:Ablex Publishing. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C.V. Negoita. Expert Systems and Fuzzy Systems. Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Nilsson. Probabilistic logic. SRI Tech. Note 321. Menlo Park. CA. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Reiter and G. Criscuolo, “Some representational issues in default reasoning,” Computers and Mathematics 9, pp. 15–28, 1983.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Sugeno, “Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals: a survey,” in Fuzzy Automata and Decision Processes. M.M. Gupta, G.N. Saridis and B.R. Gaines, (eds.), Amsterdam:North-Holland, pp. 89–102, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.R. Yager, “Quantified propositions in a linguistic logic,” in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar on Fuzzy Set Theory. E.P. Klement, (ed.), Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L.A. Zadeh, “A theory of approximate reasoning,” Electronics Research Laboratory Memorandum M77/58, University of California. Berkeley. 1977. Also in: Machine Intelligence 9. J.E. Hayes. D. Michie and LI. Kulich. (eds.). New York: Wiley. pp. 149–194. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L.A. Zadeh, “A theory of approximate reasoning,” Electronics Research Laboratory Memorandum M77/58, University of California. Berkeley. 1977. Also in: Machine Intelligence 9. J.E. Hayes. D. Michie and LI. Kulich. (eds.). New York: Wiley. pp. 149–194. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L.A Zadeh. “Test-score semantics for natural languages and meaning-representation via PRUF,” Tech. Note 247, AI Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, 1981. Also in Empirical Semantics. B.B. Rieger, (ed.), Bochum:Brockmeyer, pp. 281–349, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L.A. Zadeh, “The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11, pp. 199–227, 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. L.A Zadeh, “A theory of commonsense knowledge,” in Issues of Vagueness. H.J. S. Skala Termini and E. Trillas, (eds.), pp. 257–296, Dordrecht.-Reidel, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L.A. Zadeh, “Syllogistic reasoning in fuzzy logic and its application to usuality and reasoning with dispositions,” to appear in the IEEE Trans, on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Zemankova-Leech and A. Kandel, Fuzzy Relational Data Bases - A Key to Expert Systems. Cologne: Verlag TUV Rheinland, 1994

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zadeh, L.A. (1985). A Fòrmalization of Commonsense Reasoning Based on Fuzzy Logic. In: Brauer, W., Radig, B. (eds) Wissensbasierte Systeme. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol 112. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70840-4_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70840-4_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-15999-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70840-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics