A Third Line of Argument in Thermodynamics

  • C. Truesdell
Conference paper

Abstract

We all know the power of arguments resting on cycles. Again and again in the papers we have heard, cycles or approximations to them have delivered the goods. We know also the power of classical ideas and the value of classical thermodynamics as an example of what is wanted and what can be got. Every speaker has called upon classical arguments and classical results, not only as an important special instance that must be included in any modern theory but also as a source of inspiration. But classical thermodynamics, while it may be developed by exploiting the properties of cycles, need not be. David Owen and Manuel Ricou have reminded us that thermodynamics can be founded also upon ideas about a class of processes that need not even include non-trivial cycles.

Keywords

Entropy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

List of Sources

  1. 1.
    C. Truesdell, “Improved estimates of the efficiency of irreversible heat engines”, Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (4) 108 (1976): 305–323.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Truesdell, “Proof that my work estimate implies the Clausius-Planck inequality”, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Rendiconti della Classe di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali (8) 68 (1980):191–199.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chi-Sing Man, “Thermodynamics based on a work inequality” y Ph. D. Thesis, accepted by the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Truesdell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations