Advertisement

Principles of Controlled Clinical Studies in Psychogeriatrics

  • J. Wertheimer

Abstract

Therapeutic action in psychogeriatrics and geriatrics should take into account the multiple aspects of the total situation of the old people. The parameters of a person who is both old and sick are biological as well as psychological and social. Such a broadened awareness of a case confronting us offers a correspondingly widened potential field of action, in which the therapist is free to manoeuvre with flexibility and imagination, as he brings together social initiatives, the psychotherapeutic relationship and treatment with drugs. Medical prescriptions are, thus, made in relatively broad context; the pharmacological contribution in one case may be the predominant element, and in another it may serve more as an adjunct to other therapeutic measures. In an overall approach to the geriatric patient, a drug is one of the elements in re-adaptation, which may be defined as the aggregate of the medical, psychological and social measures employed to restore or maintain optimal autonomy. This fundamental concept should be recalled before we enter more specifically into the subject before us. The substances we study in psychogeriatric clinical pharmacology will never eliminate the need for the pluridimensional approach. Furthermore, a controlled test would constitute a serious violation of ethics should it entail the suspension of other therapeutic measures, even temporarily, in order to evaluate, separately, the efficacy of a drug.

Keywords

Social Initiative Senile Dementia Endogenous Depression Cholinergic Hypothesis Therapeutic Team 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Borkan GA, Nords AH (1980) Assessment of biological age using a profile of physical parameters. J Gerontol 35 (2): 177–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis P (1981) Theoretical treatment possibilities for dementia of the Alzheimer type: the cholinergic hypothesis. In: Crook T, Gershon S (eds) Strategies for the development of an effective treatment for senile dementia, pp 19–32Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eisdorfer C (1968) Arousal and performance: experiments in verbal learning and a tentative theory. In: Talland GA (ed) Human aging and behavior. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guidelines for the evaluation of drugs in the elderly neuropsychiatrie patient (demented and non-demented) I (1981) Pharmacopsychiatry 14: 150–154Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guidelines for the evaluation of drugs in the elderly neuropsychiatrie patient (demented and non-demented) II (1981) Pharmacopsychiatria 14: 190–199Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gurski E (1981) Evaluation of geriatric patients with special reference to clinical trials of so-called nootropic drugs. Pharmacopsychiatria 14: 51–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heimann H (1980) Über die Relevanz klinischer Meßparameter im Hinblick auf den Nutzen von Geriatrika. Symposion AGNP: gerontopsychiatrie. Arzneimittel forsch/Drag Res 30 (II, 8): 1189–1191Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Israel L (1981) Application of psychometric techniques to the study of treatment affecting brain functioning. In: Proc. Int. Drugs Studies in CVD and PVD SIR. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 89–94Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Israel L, Kozarevic D, Sartorius N (1984) Evaluations en gérontologie, vol 1. Manuel de références des moyens d’investigation et de mesure des fonctions mentales. Karger, BaselGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanowski S (1977) Erfüllen die sogenannten Geriatrika die Kriterien einer begründeten Arz-neitherapie? Verh Dtsch Ges Inn Med 83: 972–982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leber P (1983) Establishing the efficacy of drugs with psychogeriatric indications. In: Crook T, Ferris S, Bartus R (eds) Assessment in geriatric psychopharmacology. Ed. by M. Powley. pp 1–12Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Loew DM (1983) L’évaluation clinique en psychopharmacologie gériatrique. Le point de vue de l’industrie pharmaceutique. Presse Méd 12: 3141–3146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacDonald ET, MacDonald JB (1982) Drug treatment in the elderly. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moos RH, Lemke S (1979) Multiphasic environmental assessment procedure: preliminary manual. Social Ecology Laboratory, Veteran’s Administration Medical Center and Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Müller C, Wertheimer J (1981) Abrégé de psychogériatrie. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pocock S J (1979) Some additional comments on the statistical aspects of the clinical trials of single drugs reported in session III of this seminar. In: Tognoni G, Garattini S (eds) Drug treatment and prevention in cerebrovascular disorders. Elsevier/Biomedical, Amsterdam, pp 341–343Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Renzi E (1979) A neuropsychological approach to mental examination of cerebrovascular patients. In: Tognoni G, Garattini S (èds) Drug treatment and prevention in cerebrovascular disorders. Elsevier/Biomedical, Amsterdam, pp 315–326Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rossor MN, Svendsen C, Hunt SP, Mountjoy CO, Roth M, Iversen LL (1982) The substantia innominata in Alzheimer’s disease: an histochemical and biochemical study of cholinergic marker enzymes. Neurosci Lett 28: 217–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roth Sir M (1984) Senile dementia and related disorders. In: Wertheimer J, Marois M (eds) Senile dementia: outlook for the future. Liss, New York, pp 493–515Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schaie KW (1979) Psychometric assessment of intellectual competence in the elderly. In: Müller C, Wertheimer J (eds) Gerontopsychiatrie 7. Janssen Pharmaceutica, pp 205–216Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stanley B, Stanley M (1982) Testing competency in psychiatric patients. IRB 4: 1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vestal RF (1982) Pharmacology and aging. J Am Gerontol Soc 30: 191–200Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weintraub M (1984) Ethical concerns and guidelines in research in geriatric pharmacology and therapeutics: individualization, not codification. J Am Gerontol Soc 1: 44–48Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wertheimer J (1984) Pathogenèse des altérations du fonctionnement intellectuel en gériatrie. Rev Méd Suisse Romande 104: 273–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yesavage JA, Tinklenberg JR, Hollister L, Berger PA (1979) Vasodilators in senile dementias. A review of the literature. Arch Gen Psychiatry 36: 220–223PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Wertheimer
    • 1
  1. 1.Hôpital PsychogériatriquePrillySwitzerland

Personalised recommendations