Abstract
Within the last 5 years efforts at validating personality questionnaires via the multitrait-multimethod strategy (MTMM) originally proposed by Campbell and Fiske (1959; Jackson & Paunonon, 1980) have been redoubled. This interest is of course spurred on by the realization that what is actually being measured in any personality instrument is not solely the trait itself but rather the trait confounded with the method used. Rezmovic and Rezmovic (1981) succinctly summarize this state of affairs by saying that “each measure is a trait-method unit in which observed variance is a combined function of variance due to the construct being measured and the method used to measure that construct” (Rezmovic & Rezmovic, 1981, p. 61). In any attempt to introduce new personality questionnaires it has become standard practice to include some form of multitrait-multimethod analysis. While this practice is straightforward in itself, many different statistical approaches have been suggested for this purpose (Jackson, 1975; Hubert & Baker, 1978). In fact, the variety of different analyses has justified a general review and critique of approaches (Schmitt, Coyle, & Saari, 1977). Of the many proposals suggested for MTMM, the approach via confirmatory factor analysis seems to be the most straightforward and promising in this context (Schmitt, 1978; Rezmovic & Rezmovic, 1980, 1981).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56 ,81–105.
Fiske, D.W. (1973). Can a personality construct be validated empirically? Psychological Bul letin, 80 ,89–92.
Fiske, D.W. (1976). Can a personality construct have a singular validational pattern? Rejoinder to Huba and Hamilton. Psychological Bulletin, 83 ,877–879.
Hubert, L.J., & Baker, F.B. (1978). Analyzing the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Multivari ate Behavioral Research, 13 ,163–179.
Jackson, D.N. (1975). Multimethod factor analysis: A reformulation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10 ,253–276.
Jackson, D.N., & Paunonon, S.V. (1980). Personality structure and assessment. Annual Re view of Psychology, 31 ,503–551.
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods (Research Rep. 81–8). Uppsala: University of Uppsala.
Rezmovic, EX., & Rezmovic, V. (1980). Empirical validation of psychological constructs: A secondary analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 87 ,66–71.
Rezmovic, EX., & Rezmovic, V. (1981). A confirmatory factor analysis approach to construct validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41 ,61–72.
Schmitt, N. (1978). Path analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2 ,157–173.
Schmitt, N., Coyle, B.W., & Saari, B.B. (1977). A review and critique of analyses of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12 ,447–478.
Stumpf, H., Angleitner, A., Wieck, T., Jackson, D.N., Beloch-Till, H. (1985). Deutsche “Personality Research Form” (PRF). Göttingen, Hogrefe.
Tucker, L.R. (1958). An inter-battery method of factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23 ,111–136.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rudinger, G., Dommel, N. (1986). An Example of Convergent and Discriminant Validation of Personality Questionnaires. In: Angleitner, A., Wiggins, J.S. (eds) Personality Assessment via Questionnaires. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70751-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70751-3_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70753-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70751-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive