Advertisement

Role of T Cells in the Unusual Cutaneous Responses to Leishmania in BALB/c Mice

  • F. Y. Liew
  • J. G. Howard
Part of the Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology book series (CT MICROBIOLOGY, volume 122)

Abstract

Understanding of the major influence of host immunogenetics on leishmaniasis has been greatly advanced by the use of inbred mouse strains which are susceptible to leishmanial species pathogenic to man. Most inbred mice are relatively resistant to cutaneous leishmaniasis and develop limited self-healing or non-progressive lesions. In contrast, BALB/c mice are extremely susceptible to Leishmania major which produces uniformly fatal disseminating visceral disease even with minimal infecting doses. Evidence will be summarised showing that the idiosyncratic response of BALB/c mice to cutaneous leishmaniasis is determined by a series of interactions between various subsets of specific T cells, the balance of which determines the outcome of infection.

Keywords

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Major Infection Cell Surface Phenotype Sublethal Irradiation Leishmania Tropica 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asherson GL, Zembala M (1975) Inhibitory T cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 72:55–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackwell JM, Ulczak OM (1984) Immunoregulation of genetically controlled acquired responses toLeishmania dcnovani infection in mice: demonstration and characterization of suppressor T cells in noncure mice. Infect Immun 44:97–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Crocker PR, Blackwell JM, Bradley DJ (1984) Expression of the natural resistance gene Lsh in resident liver macrophages. Infect Immun 43: 1033–1040PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dhaliwal JS, Liew FY, Cox FEG (1985, to be published) Specific suppressor T cells for delayed-type hypersensitivity in susceptible mice immunised against cutaneous leishmaniasis. Infect ImmunGoogle Scholar
  5. Gorczynski RM, MacRae S (1981) Analysis of subpopulations of glass- adherent mouse skin cells controlling resistance/susceptibility to infection withLeishmania tropica and correlation with the development of independent proliferative signals to Lyt-1.2+/Lyt-2.1+ T lymphocytes. Cell Immunol 67:74–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hill JO, North RJ, Collins FM (1983) Advantages of measuring changes in the number of viable parasites in murine models of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis. Infect Immun 39:1087–1094PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Howard JG (1985, to be published) Host immunity to leishmaniasis. In: Chang K-P, Bray RS (eds) Leishmaniasis, Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. Howard JG, Hale C, Liew FY (1980a) Immunological regulation of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis. III. Nature and significance of specific suppression of cell-mediated immunity in mice highly susceptible toLeishmania tropica. J Exp Med 152:594–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Howard JG, Hale C, Liew FY (1980b) Genetically determined susceptibility toLeishmania tropica infection is expressed by haematopoietic donor cells in mouse radiation chimaeras. Nature 288:161–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howard JG, Hale C, Liew FY (1981) Immunological regulation of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis. IV. Prophylactic effect of sublethal irradiation as a result of abrogation of suppressor T cell generation in mice genetically susceptible to Leishmania tropica. J Exp Med 153:557–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Howard JG, Nickiin S, Hale C, Liew FY (1982) Prophylactic immunization against experimental leishmaniasis. I. Protection induced in mice genetically vulnerable to fatalLeishmania tropica infection. J Immunol 129:2206–2212PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Howard JG, Liew FY, Hale C, Nickiin S (1984) Prophylactic immunization against experimental leishmaniasis. II. Further characterization of the protective immunity against fatalLeishmania tropica infection induced by irradiated promastigotes. J Immunol 132:450–455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Liew FY (1982) Regulation of delayed-type hypersensitivity to pathogens and alloantigens. Immunol Today 3:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liew FY, Hale C, Howard JG (1982) Immunologic regulation of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis. V. Characterization of effector and specific suppressor T cells. J Immunol 128:1917–1922PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Liew FY, Howard JG, Hale C (1984) Prophylactic immunization against experimental leishmaniasis. III. Protection against fatalLeishmania tropica infection induced by irradiated promastigotes involves Lyt- 1+2 T cells which do not mediate cutaneous DTH. J Immunol 132:456–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mitchell GF, Curtis JM, Handman E, McKenzie IFC (1980) Cutaneous leishmaniasis in mice: disease patterns in reconstituted nude mice of several genotypes infected with Leishmania tropica. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 58:521–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Preston PM, Dumonde DC (1976) Experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis. V. Protective immunity in subclinical and self-healing infection in the mouse. Clin Exp Immunol 23:126–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Titus RG, Lima GC, Engers HD, Louis JA (1984) Exacerbation of murine cutaneous leishmaniasis by adoptive transfer of parasite-specific helper T cell populations capable of mediatingLeishmania major-pecific delayed-type hypersensitivity. J Immunol 133:1594–1600PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Y. Liew
  • J. G. Howard

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations