Immobilised Plant Cell Culture Systems

  • K. Lindsey
  • M. M. Yeoman
Part of the Proceedings in Life Sciences book series (LIFE SCIENCES)


In the last 5 years in particular there has been a rejuvenated interest in the use of cultured plant cells for the study of secondary metabolism. More specifically, this interest has become apparent as a burgeoning of reports describing the immobilisation of plant cells in a variety of putatively inert matrices, and it is primarily this area with which we will deal in this article. Although, as we will see, immobilisation itself may in some cases act to enhance the biochemical productivity of cell cultures, we believe that it is merely one part of a sequence of “manipulations” which, in concert, will result in the in vitro production of high yields of specific secondary metabolites.


Calcium Alginate Plant Cell Culture Tropane Alkaloid Capsicum Frutescens Immobilise Cell Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alfermann AW, Schuller I, Reinhard E (1980) Biotransformation of cardiac glycosides by immobilised cells of Digitalis lanata. Planta Med 40:218–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brodelius P, Nilsson K (1980) Entrapment of plant cells in different matrices. FEBS Lett 122: 312–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brodelius P, Deus B, Mosbach K, Zenk MH (1979) Immobilised plant cells for the production and transformation of natural products. FEBS Lett 103:93–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Felix HR, Mosbach K (1982) Enhanced stability of enzymes in permeabilised and immobilised cells. Biotechnol Lett 4:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Felix HR, Brodelius P, Mosbach K (1981) Enzyme activities of the primary and secondary metabolism of simultaneously permeabilised and immobilised plant cells. Anal Biochem 116:462–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Furuya T, Yoshikawa T, Taira M (1984) Biotransformation of codeinone to codeine by immobilised cells of Papaver somniferum. Phytochemistry 23:999–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jirku V, Macek T, Vanek T, Krumphanzl V, Kubanek V (1981) Continuous production of steroid glycoalkaloids by immobilised plant cells. Biotechnol Lett 3:447–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones A, Veliky IA (1981) Examination of parameters affecting the 5-β-hydroxylation of digitox-igenin by immobilised cells of Daucus carota. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 13:84–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Knobloch KH, Beutnagel G, Berlin J (1981) Influence of accumulated phosphate on culture growth and formation of cinnamoyl putrescines in medium-induced cell suspension cultures of Nicotiana tabacum. Planta 153:582–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lambe CA, Rosevear A (1982) Production of chemical compounds from viable cells. UK Patent No. GB2 096 169AGoogle Scholar
  11. Lindsey K, Yeoman MM (1983a) The relationship between growth rate, differentiation and alkaloid accumulation in cell cultures. J Exp Bot 34:1055–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lindsey K, Yeoman MM (1983b) Novel experimental systems for studying the production of secondary plant metabolites by plant tissue cultures. In: Mantell SH, Smith H (eds) Plant biotechnology. Soc Exp Biol Semin Ser, vol 18. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 39–66Google Scholar
  13. Lindsey K, Yeoman MM (1984a) Dynamics of plant cell cultures. In: Vasil IK (ed) Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants. II. Academic Press, London New York, in pressGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindsey K, Yeoman MM (1984b) The synthetic potential of immobilised cells of Capsicum frutes-cens Mill. cv. annuum. Planta 162:495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindsey K, Yeoman MM (1984c) Techniques for the immobilisation of plant cells. In: Mosbach K (ed) Immobilised enzymes and cells. Methods in enzymology. Academic Press, London New York, in pressGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindsey K, Yeoman MM (1984d) The viability and biosynthetic activity of cells of Capsicum fru-tescens Mill. cv. annuum immobilised in reticulate polyurethane. J Exp Bot 35:1684–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindsey K, Yeoman MM (1985) Immobilised plant cells. In: Yeoman MM (ed) Plant cell culture technology, botanical monograph series. Blackwell, Oxford, in pressGoogle Scholar
  18. Lindsey K, Yeoman MM, Black GM, Mavituna F (1983) A novel method for the immobilisation and culture of plant cells. FEBS Lett 155:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mantell SH, Smith H (1983) Cultural factors that influence secondary metabolite accumulation in plant cell and tissue cultures. In: Mantell SH, Smith H (eds) Plant Biotechnology. Soc Exp Biol Semin Ser, vol 18. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 75–108Google Scholar
  20. Morris P, Fowler MW (1981) A new method for the production of fine plant cell suspension cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 1:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ogino T, Hiraoka N, Tabata M (1978) Selection of high nicotine-producing cell lines of tobacco callus by single cell cloning. Phytochemistry 17:1907–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Phillips R, Henshaw GG (1977) The regulation of synthesis of phenolics in stationary phase cell cultures of Acer pseudoplatanus L. J Exp Bot 28:785–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prenosil JE, Pedersen H (1983) Immobilised plant cell reactors. Enzyme Microb Technol 5:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schenk RU, Hildebrandt AC (1972) Medium and techniques for induction and growth of mono-cotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cell cultures. Can J Bot 50:199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shuler ML (1981) Production of secondary metabolites from plant tissue culture — problems and prospects. Ann NY Acad Sci 369:65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wichers HJ, Malingre TM, Huizing HJ (1983) The effect of some environmental factors on the production of L-DOPA by alginate-entrapped cells of Mucuna pruriens. Planta 158:482–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Widholm JM (1972) The use of fluorescein diacetate and phenosafranine for determining viability of cultured plant cells. Stain Technol 47:189–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Yeoman MM, Miedzybrodzka MB, Lindsey K, McLauchlan WR (1980) The synthetic potential of cultured plant cells. In: Sala F, Parisi B, Cella R, Cifferi O (eds) Plant cell cultures: results and perspectives. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 327–343Google Scholar
  29. Yeoman MM, Lindsey K, Miedzybrodzka MB, McLauchlan WR (1982) Accumulation of secondary products as a facet of differentiation in plant cell and tissue cultures. In: Yeoman MM, Truman DES (eds) Differentiation in vitro. Br Soc Cell Biol Symp, vol IV. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 65–82Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Lindsey
  • M. M. Yeoman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations