Abstract
Although the notion of muscarinic receptor heterogeneity originated from studies on agonist binding (Birdsall et al. 1978), the most compelling evidence for the classification of muscarinic receptors into subtypes was obtained from studies of selective antagonists, of which pirenzepine is the prototype (Hammer et al. 1980). Originally, biochemical characterization of muscarinic receptors was performed in discrete brain areas and later extented to peripheral tissues abundantly endowed with these receptors. Conversely, the majority of pharmacological investigations centered on the interaction of agonists and antagonists with peripheral muscarinic receptors, particularly those involved in gastrointestinal secretion and motility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atweh S, Simon JR, Kuhar MJ (1975) Utilization of sodium-dependent high affinity choline uptake in vitro as a measure of the activity of cholinergic neurones in vivo. Life Sci 17: 1535–1544.
Birdsall NJM, Burgen ASV, Hulme EC (1978) The binding of agonists to brain muscarinic receptors. Mol Pharmacol 14: 723–736.
Briggs CA, Cooper JR (1981) A synaptosomal preparation from the guinea pig ileum myenteric plexus. J Neurochem 36: 1097–1108.
Fox JET, Daniel EE, MacDonald TJ, Jury J, Robotham KH (1983) Evidence for a muscarinic inhibitory brake activated by peptides in the canine small intestine. In: Roman C (ed) Gastrointestinal motility. MTP Press, Lancaster, pp 327–333.
Halim S, Kilbinger H, Wessler I (1982) Pirenzepine does not discriminate between pre-and post-synaptic muscarine receptors in the guinea-pig small intestine. Scand J Gastroenterol 17 [Suppl 72]: 87–93.
Hammer R, Berrie CP, Birdsall NJM, Burgen ASV, Hulme EC (1980) Pirenzepine distinguishes between different subclasses of muscarinic receptors. Nature (Lond) 283: 90–92.
Hammer R, Giachetti A (1982) Muscarinic receptor subtypes: M1 and M2 biochemical and functional characterization. Life Sci 31: 2991–2998.
Heinzel G (1982) In: Bozler G, van Rossum SM (eds) Pharmacokinetics during drug development: data analysis and evaluation techniques. Fischer, New York, pp
Mc Caman RE, Hunt JM (1965) Microdetermination of choline acetylase in nervous tissue. J Neurochem 12: 253–259.
North A, Slack BE, Surprenant A (1985) Muscarinic M1 and M2 receptors mediate depolarization and presynaptic inhibition in guinea pig enteric nervous system. J Physiol (Lond) in press.
Pagani F, Schiavone A, Monferini E, Hammer R, Giachetti A (1984) Distinct muscarinic receptor subtypes (M1 and M2) controlling acid secretion in rodents. Trends Pharmacol Sci 5 (Suppl, Subtypes of Muscarinic Receptors) pp 66–68.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Giachetti, A., Monferini, E., Schiavone, A., Micheletti, R., Hammer, R., Ladinsky, H. (1985). Functional and Biochemical Evidence for Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes in the Gastrointestinal Tract. In: Lux, G., Daniel, E.E. (eds) Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes in the GI Tract. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70668-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70668-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70670-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70668-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive