Isolation and Characterization of 5′-Nucleotidase from Avian Muscle Sources and its Interaction with Filamentous Actin
5′-Nucleotidase has been known for a long time to be an ectoenzyme concentrated in the plasma membrane of many eukaryotic cells. DePierre and Karnovsky (1974) first demonstrated its nature as an ectoenzyme and since then a vast amount of literature has been compiled concerning its enzymatic properties and presumed functional significance. In spite of efforts in many laboratories it has been impossible to assign a definitive function to this enzyme. It has been found, however, that adenosine, the product formed by its enzymatic action on 5′-AMP, can act as a local modulator of cellular functions in a number of different tissues, such as the vascular and central nervous systems (for a review see Arch and Newsholme 1978).
KeywordsAdenosine Polypeptide Polyacrylamide Catalase Hepes
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dieckhoff J, Heidemann M, Mannherz HG (1984) The isolation of 5′-nucleotidase from avian sources and its interaction with polymeric actin. J Submicrosc Cytol 16: 33 - 34Google Scholar
- Eadie CS (1942) The inhibition of cholesterase by physostigmine and prostigmine. J Biol Chem 146: 85 - 93Google Scholar
- Jarrett L, Smith RM (1974) The stimulation of adipocyte plasma membrane magnesium ion- stimulated adenosine triphosphatase by insulin and concanavalin A. J Biol Chem 249: 5195 - 5199Google Scholar
- Hoffstee BHJ (1952) Specificity of esterases I. Identification of two pancreatic aliesterases. B Biol Chem 199: 357 - 364Google Scholar
- Lengsfeld AM, Low I, Wieland T, Danker P, Hasselbach W(1974) Interaction of phalloidin with actin. Proc Natl. Acad Sci USA 71: 2803 - 2807Google Scholar
- Mannherz HG, Rohr G (1978) 5′-Nucleotidase reverses the inhibitory action of actin on pancreatic deoxyribnuclease I. FEBS Lett 95: 284 - 289Google Scholar
- Zachowski A, Evans HW, Paraf A (1981) Immunological evidence that plasma-membrane 5′- nucleotidase is a transmembrane protein. Biochim Biophys Acta 664: 121 - 126Google Scholar